...
Show More
I would definitely not recommend this. In fact, I almost gave up halfway through. However, it is interesting for historical reasons. The Greek odes served as a precursor to the odes of the Renaissance and the modern hymns found in churches. Many musical terminologies, such as rhapsody, chorus, and orchestra, originated from the Greek parlance of theatre, poetry, and music. Pindar is reputed to be a most famous lyric poet, although this may not be evident from the English translation. These odes were composed to celebrate Olympic victories, and what I find most interesting are as follows: 1. The Greeks' obsession with ancestry - The victors were often lauded, and then Pindar would proceed to praise the heroes and the gods from which the heroes originated (such as Heracles from Thebes and so on). This is astonishing because these mythical heroes were referred to as if they were only a couple of generations back. 2. Winners were celebrated like heroes, with almost god-like attributes - In the classical world, it appears that there were multiple degrees of godhood. If you were a great politician or an Olympic winner, you were almost celebrated in the same way as people celebrated Heracles or Theseus. All this, despite the famous Greek injunction against hubris (e.g. Phaeton, Niobe, Pentheus). 3. The songs are too long to be considered a song in the modern sense. They are probably closer to recitatives in opera, sometimes interspersed with detailed mythology. This is strange if you think about it. Who would bother to listen to the detailed genealogy and old stories of one's ancestors when writing an ode to celebrate someone? Maybe this is where we differ so much from the ancient world.