Reading "Step on a Crack" was truly a rather strange experience. I can only account for this by supposing that the two distinct settings, namely: a) Mike Bennett's domestic circumstances and b) the hostage-taking were evidently written separately by the co-authors. That's the sole reason I can fathom my conflicting emotions regarding this book.
Mike Bennett is on the verge of losing his beloved young wife to cancer, yet he remains strong for his brood of 10 (adopted) children, whose ages range from 13 to 3 years old. Naturally, the children are adorable and perfect (how ideal!). Still, the home scenes were enjoyable, and I felt genuine emotions there.
As for the hostage-taking, I believed that was the genuine weak point of the story. There was a considerable amount of senseless violence committed by the kidnappers, and on top of that, they made the cops appear incompetent and clueless. It seemed unrealistic.
This book failed to provide the depth I had anticipated. Moreover, the resolution of the case and obtaining answers to the "why" were swiftly glossed over in just one page. It left me feeling dissatisfied.
Would I be interested in reading more in this series? Certainly. I admit being completely smitten with Mike and the 10 kids, but I hope that the mystery and police work improve significantly.