I realized then the profound truth about all love: that it is an absolute, all-encompassing force that demands everything or forfeits all. The other emotions, such as compassion and tenderness, exist merely on the periphery, belonging to the constructs of society and habit.
My gratitude for M.J. Nicholls remains prominent in this celebration. It wasn't he who directly steered me towards this massive work. Honestly, I'm unable to gather any of MJN's inferences in the direction of Durrell. It was more Nicholls' spirit, that praiseworthy expansion on what we discuss when we review books on GR. Nietzsche initiated this process, loudly proclaiming that there are no facts, only interpretations. This leads us shining into the vortex of Durrell's 4D (apologies to Sherman and Peabody) tetralogy, with one name, one face, and one book for each dimension in that peculiar quantum way.
We commence at the End. The End, mind you, only of an Affair. There is something unctuous and queasy about this, much like Greene's masterpiece. Bendrix and Darley are well-suited for each other, but before one can Blitz the Casbah, the threads diverge and the emphasis progresses at a different angle, involving other souls. Some are deceased, while others are despairing. There is a dank, musky odor of incest here. This theme finds a strange counterpoint throughout.
The novel Balthazar takes the premise of Justine - foreigners misbehaving in the ancient city - and extrapolates it with an unknown resonance. A History worthy of Foucault is emerging midway through the second novel. Darley/Durrell is establishing a "great interlinear", a hypertext with contradicting testimony interspersed within his own account.
Montolive is my favorite among the set and a likely pinnacle of Durrell's ambition. The title character is a diplomat whose own troubled passion reverberates through the relationships of all the other characters, even as War looms on the horizon. The poems of Cavafy haunt the crackling descriptions of the feverish Egypt of the 1930s. This is a lost city buried beneath Islamic nationalism and a modern legacy of defeat and corruption.
The Quartet struggles to a halt in Clea, by far the weakest novel of the series. The necessary struggles of Darley and Clea felt so contrived that I have difficulty even thinking calmly about it now. What remains calm, however, are my memories of the book as an object. I purchased a hardcovered boxed set of the Quartet 20 years ago and attempted several times to find my footing in its opening pages. This was to no avail. Last fall, while limping around on a sore knee in Berlin, I went with my wife to an English Language second-hand bookshop just off of Karl Marx Allee. It is more pathetic than romantic to see an American limping abroad with his hands full of pretentious novels. Thus, I am guilty.