There is always a bit of distrust when a work published in 1992 is only translated more than 25 years later. This distrust is even more legitimate when it comes to one of the most bankable authors of a publishing house, the author of many bestsellers: JONATHAN FRANZEN. Second alert, I had heard not very positive reviews that pointed out one of the most common mistakes among young authors – Franzen was a young author at the time even if it's hard to imagine – the fact of putting too many things in his novels, in other words, of making them too much or trying to do too much with them.
There is a specific odor, an ancient, humid and melancholy odor, that emanates from Boston after sunset, when the temperature is cool and there is no wind. Convection picks it up from the ecologically disturbed waters of the Mystic and the Charles, as well as from the lakes. The abandoned mills and the sleeping steel mills of Waltham diffuse it. It is the breath exhaled by its old tunnels, the spirit that rises from the piles of glass dulled by pollution and the ballast of old railroad tracks, from all those silent places where the iron rusts, where the rotten concrete crumbles like an inorganic Roquefort, and where the petroleum distillates return to the earth. In a city where there is not a single plot of land that has not been transformed, it has become a primordial odor, the odor of nature that has replaced nature.
But nothing could be done, I must really be a fan of Franzen – rereading my rhapsodic article dedicated to Freedom it seems quite obvious. I must admit that I'm rubbing my hands at the prospect of reading his flagship novel _The Corrections_ and that I recently bought the rather mediocrely received Purity. Even if I agree a bit on the possible superfluity of dealing with two big social issues in a novel, this vast field gives the author the opportunity to juggle between the two – even if I understand that it is legitimate to think that all this is a bit back to basics. The characters are certainly quite deliberately original, but they are still for me far from the stereotypical characters that can be found in lower-end novels.
All the sadness of the 1970s was gathered in Jurene's drawer, all those years during which Renée had not been happy and had not had what she wanted, afflicted as she was with pimples and friends she was ashamed of, those years whose pie-crust collars, platform soles, flared pants and overly long hair (don't the mentally ill neglect to have their hair cut?) now seemed to her the symbolic and literal panoply of misfortune.
The alternation of different focal points between the destiny of the characters and the ecological concerns – as I was saying there is also a question of another social issue that I do not reveal so as not to disclose – offers a very pleasant variety and in fact indispensable to hold on such a length (~700 pages). I must certainly not be objective, but I really enjoyed this reading which was not affected by the small flaws mentioned at the beginning of the article. To be honest, I may have slowed down a little on the last hundred pages, but nothing to make a big deal out of it.
One of Franzen's better books offers a captivating exploration. It delves into how earthquakes are intertwined with corporate culpability. We see a family inheritance that tears a family apart, and a complex relationship between a brilliant seismologist and a balding man who struggles to find inner peace and harmony with his family.
There are moments that grip the reader like a thrilling suspense story. Louis Holland and Renee Seitchek uncover a corporate conspiracy that might be accountable for the seismic activity in the northeast United States. Additionally, there's an engaging subplot involving abortion and a young minister. He engages in a debate about the pros and cons of his stance with a willful woman, and this subplot concludes with a proverbial, seismic shocker.
However, there are times when Franzen's writing gets a bit too verbose and bloated. Still, it's perhaps better to err on the side of having too much rather than too little. Earthquake destruction is vividly描绘 throughout the story, and so are the bruised hearts of the characters, adding depth and emotional resonance to the narrative.
Franzen's postmodern, or almost postmodern work is quite an interesting read. The story presents various themes that are common in his other works. Louis has issues with both his mother and sister, who are manipulative and similar in nature. Due to an unexpected inheritance, they bring out the worst in each other. Meanwhile, Louis finds himself chasing after problematic women like Laurel and Renée. Laurel is a spoiled brat, while Renée is a wounded woman who lashes out in response to provocations only she perceives. There are also earthquakes, an anti-abortion preacher, and a multinational company that pollutes and causes disasters. The novel has a rather good-natured ending with the restoration of relationships and hope for a better future. It's clear that this was written before the crisis and the unnamed event that shook America and affected civil rights. However, it is undoubtedly Franzen's most postmodern novel yet.
One of the notable quotes from the book is: "A person could find themselves loving enemies and beggars and ridiculous parents, people it had been so easy to keep at a distance and towards whom, if in a moment of weakness one let oneself go and loved them, one then acquired an eternal responsibility." This quote highlights the complex nature of human relationships and the unexpected bonds that can form.