Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought

... Show More
Book by Chomsky, Noam

152 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,1966

About the author

... Show More
Avram Noam Chomsky is an American professor and public intellectual known for his work in linguistics, political activism, and social criticism. Sometimes called "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He is a laureate professor of linguistics at the University of Arizona and an institute professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics. In addition to his work in linguistics, since the 1960s Chomsky has been an influential voice on the American left as a consistent critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, and corporate influence on political institutions and the media.
Born to Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants in Philadelphia, Chomsky developed an early interest in anarchism from alternative bookstores in New York City. He studied at the University of Pennsylvania. During his postgraduate work in the Harvard Society of Fellows, Chomsky developed the theory of transformational grammar for which he earned his doctorate in 1955. That year he began teaching at MIT, and in 1957 emerged as a significant figure in linguistics with his landmark work Syntactic Structures, which played a major role in remodeling the study of language. From 1958 to 1959 Chomsky was a National Science Foundation fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. He created or co-created the universal grammar theory, the generative grammar theory, the Chomsky hierarchy, and the minimalist program. Chomsky also played a pivotal role in the decline of linguistic behaviorism, and was particularly critical of the work of B.F. Skinner.
An outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which he saw as an act of American imperialism, in 1967 Chomsky rose to national attention for his anti-war essay "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Becoming associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism and placed on President Richard M. Nixon's list of political opponents. While expanding his work in linguistics over subsequent decades, he also became involved in the linguistics wars. In collaboration with Edward S. Herman, Chomsky later articulated the propaganda model of media criticism in Manufacturing Consent, and worked to expose the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. His defense of unconditional freedom of speech, including that of Holocaust denial, generated significant controversy in the Faurisson affair of the 1980s. Chomsky's commentary on the Cambodian genocide and the Bosnian genocide also generated controversy. Since retiring from active teaching at MIT, he has continued his vocal political activism, including opposing the 2003 invasion of Iraq and supporting the Occupy movement. An anti-Zionist, Chomsky considers Israel's treatment of Palestinians to be worse than South African–style apartheid, and criticizes U.S. support for Israel.
Chomsky is widely recognized as having helped to spark the cognitive revolution in the human sciences, contributing to the development of a new cognitivistic framework for the study of language and the mind. Chomsky remains a leading critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, U.S. involvement and Israel's role in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and mass media. Chomsky and his ideas are highly influential in the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movements. Since 2017, he has been Agnese Helms Haury Chair in the Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizona.

Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 21 votes)
5 stars
7(33%)
4 stars
9(43%)
3 stars
5(24%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
21 reviews All reviews
July 15,2025
... Show More
In a glance,

In the Western world, Descartes is known as the founder of a new philosophy. In fact, the term "new philosophy" is applied to philosophy from Descartes onwards. A new era begins from the age of Descartes, and we can witness its influence in various fields of science.

Although some linguists believe that all the important linguistic studies before the 19th century, which are no longer within the scope of linguistics today, can be summarized in a few sentences, Noam Chomsky does not accept this theory. In his book "Cartesian Linguistics", he wants to return to the past, pay attention to the studies of the 17th and 18th centuries and the early 19th century, and make the minds aware of new discoveries. Therefore, he uses the term "Cartesian Linguistics", which seems strange, to cover languages. He says: "I do not try to describe Cartesian Linguistics as this science itself wants, but I try to direct my attention to the ideas and arrangements that appeared in a completely independent way in new works." Therefore, it is not difficult for those who are familiar with Chomsky's grammar to understand and comprehend these issues. But the main question raised about Cartesian Linguistics is whether the issues related to language that are found in Descartes' works are based on his mind or have roots in earlier works. And if not, why do we study Cartesian Linguistics and even Descartes does not pay attention to language in his important works such as "Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason" and "Meditations". Can we speak with a common interpretation of Cartesian Linguistics?

Chomsky, with his knowledge of these facts and the worthiness of knowing such questions, deals with this problem in a small-volume book. This book is divided into four main parts, namely:

The creative aspect of language use

The structure of the mind and the structure of language

Description and explanation in linguistics

The acquisition and use of language

Finally, a summary of Chomsky's statements is presented. The author of this book aims to show that the new theories of linguistics are mentioned in previous studies.
July 15,2025
... Show More
Descartes' philosophy has had a profound impact on modern-day linguistics.

His ideas about the nature of knowledge and the mind have provided a framework for understanding how language works.

In modern linguistics, Cartesian philosophy is often used to explore the relationship between language and thought.

For example, some linguists believe that language is a tool for expressing pre-existing thoughts, while others argue that language actually shapes our thoughts.

Descartes' emphasis on the importance of clear and distinct ideas also has implications for linguistics.

Linguists strive to develop clear and precise theories about language in order to better understand its structure and function.

This essay provides a concise and interesting overview of Cartesian philosophy as it applies to modern-day linguistics.

It is recommended for anyone with a slight background in either subject who wants to learn more about this fascinating area of study.
July 15,2025
... Show More
I remember reading everything Noam Chomsky ever wrote. It was quite a daunting task, but by doing so, I became pretty adept in linguistics, cognitive science, psychology, and so on.

Well, I never knew I would have to properly learn French to do it. After all, I had a grandfather and grandmother in Paris, both tenured Professors of French Studies. Yes, I knew the language by the age of 8, but not to a technical philosophical extent.

Thus, this book actually forced me to learn to read technical French (and German if I recall) as the entire book was in French. The English translations are important as now people can see how good of an intellectual historian Noam really is and the importance of this book. However, it still loses the je ne sais quoi of the French language, which is a beautiful language.

Chomsky basically takes a strong look at the Cartesians, who are the philosophers who followed in the philosophical paradigm shift of Rene Descartes. At this time, as Chomsky points out, there was not much separation between Philosophy and Science. The beginnings of specialization begin here. Chomsky's scholarship is quite outstanding whatever field he is writing in, and here he really hammers home the notion that it is Cartesian Rationalism that was coming to similar conclusions (at least at the general philosophic level) that language is something that separates man from automata. This is much of what this small book by Chomsky is about, but I won't spoil the rest. I disagree with the description that this book was somehow controversial. Obscure perhaps, and not widely read perhaps, but it is certainly clear and convincing. In the pursuit of knowledge, it is a good thing to know there are people who laid the foundation well before you arrived on the scene. Descartes is someone whose shoulders we must stand on so that we can continue the great work.
July 15,2025
... Show More
I arrived at the translation by Gabriel and Joan Ferrater (which is always good). It is interesting, but I hope to be able to expand it.

I don't quite understand what contributions it makes beyond the state of the question.

Perhaps with further exploration and analysis, we can uncover the hidden depths and unique perspectives that this translation holds.

It could potentially offer new insights into the subject matter, or present a different way of looking at the existing knowledge.

By delving deeper into the text, we might be able to identify the specific aspects that make this translation stand out and add value to the overall discussion.

This could involve examining the language used, the interpretations provided, or the connections made with other related works.

Only through a more comprehensive and in-depth study can we fully appreciate the significance and potential of this translation.
July 15,2025
... Show More
Generative grammar, in general, and rationalistic philosophy of mind, in particular, possess a long-reaching and profound tradition.

Chomsky, a prominent figure in this field, unveils this tradition by reviewing modernist authors who are utterly unknown to many, such as the Oxford Platonists.

His exploration provides valuable insights into the historical and intellectual roots of these concepts.

McGilvray offers an excellent introduction to this topic, which helps readers to better understand the significance and complexity of generative grammar and rationalistic philosophy of mind.

However, it should be noted that there are too many notes in the text, which may sometimes disrupt the flow of reading.

Despite this minor drawback, the overall work is a valuable contribution to the field and值得一读 for those interested in language, mind, and philosophy.
July 15,2025
... Show More
It turns out that Noam Chomsky did not invent the following ideas.

First, human language is generative, meaning one can construct indefinitely many novel utterances from a finite set of morphemes. Second, language is acquired unconsciously, and speakers know things about language that they weren't explicitly taught and aren't really aware of. Third, languages are unified by an underlying "universal grammar". Fourth, language operates at two levels: deep structure (logical form) and surface structure (phonetic form).

In fact, these notions are hundreds of years old. Chomsky traces the articulation of these ideas in the philosophy of language. For example, who knew that the Port-Royal Grammar and Logic of the 1660's describes a prototype theory of universal grammar? It's interesting trivia and intellectual history.

However, there are some gripes. Annoyingly, my 1966 edition provides long passages of French and German with no translation. Moreover, Chomsky frequently references and criticizes the attitudes of modern linguistics (circa 1950's) without clearly describing the ideas he's backhanding. This can make it difficult for the reader to fully understand his arguments.
July 15,2025
... Show More
Although I have discovered that some of Chomsky's theories and assumptions are seriously flawed, there is no denying that this is an impressive and distinctive work of thought.

It has propelled the field of linguistics to advance by leaps and bounds.

However, some might argue that it has also set the field of linguistics back a few light years simultaneously.

Chomsky's work has had a profound impact on the study of language, inspiring countless scholars to explore and question the nature of language.

Despite its flaws, it remains an important and influential piece of work that continues to shape the field of linguistics today.

July 15,2025
... Show More
Noam Chomsky has a truly distinctive style when it comes to revealing his approaches towards logical fallacies and their emotional reflection.

This remarkable book represents Chomsky's in-depth interpretation of Descartes’s philosophy and approach to language. As Descartes expounded, the Cartesian linguists held the view that language is a rather simple process that serves to reflect the identity of the person and is not necessarily primarily for communication purposes.

Chomsky, on the other hand, has an extremely profound ideology regarding language. He delves into the complexity that a language can possess by sharing various aspects such as sound, vocabulary, syntax, and more. Chomsky employs a rational manner in dealing with language, wherein he discusses the Port-royal grammar to analyze the philosophy of language. Additionally, he also lucidly explains the foundation of the UG (universal grammar).

Overall, this is a very interesting book that offers valuable insights into understanding the philosophy of language, spanning from Descartes to Chomsky. It provides readers with a comprehensive perspective on the evolution and nuances of language philosophy over time.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.