Book is similar to the documentary film about the crimes of the United States

In the last century, and also similar to WikiLeaks in revealing secret matters.

Uncle Sam wants to create (a living field) for him as Chomsky discussed in many of his previous books, and within this living field, those who attempt to be independent and autonomous will receive a severe and merciless punishment by decision.

However, relying on it to explain all of America's new stances that are economically prosperous and militarily complex against the militants around the world will not be entirely correct.

The current United States is not the power that Chomsky intended in his books.

This book seems to offer a unique perspective on the United States, comparing it to both a documentary film about its crimes and WikiLeaks in terms of uncovering secrets. It delves into the idea of a "living field" that Uncle Sam aims to create, where independence and autonomy are met with harsh consequences. But it also cautions against using this concept to fully explain all of America's actions. The current state of the United States may not align with what Chomsky had in mind in his works. Overall, this book provides an interesting and thought-provoking analysis of the United States and its role in the world.

The fountain of knowledge reveals that America used to manipulate the European countries in the past, just as it is manipulating the Arab countries now.

"The US policy in the Third World: We oppose democracy if its results are beyond our control, and the problem with real democracies is that they are vulnerable to falling freely into the area where governments are supposed to respond to the interests of their peoples rather than the interests of American investors."

Generally, the American international relations system is that while the United States offers lip service to democracy, its true commitment is to "private capitalist projects." And when the rights of American investors are threatened, democracy has to leave and it doesn't matter if dictatorships that torture and kill take its place!

It is clear that the United States has a long history of using its power and influence to advance its own interests, often at the expense of other countries and their people. This behavior not only undermines the principles of democracy and human rights but also leads to instability and conflict in many parts of the world. It is time for the international community to hold the United States accountable for its actions and work towards a more just and equitable world order.

**Book Resembling the Documentary Film about US Crimes**

In the last century, the book also resembles WikiLeaks in revealing secret matters.

The book begins by presenting the main goals of the United States after World War II. The most important one is the vast sphere, which includes half of the Western Hemisphere, Western Europe, the Far East, former British colonies, and energy sources in the Middle East - which are like no others - that were turning to us, and the rest of the Third World, if possible, the rest of the world.

Another important goal for America is combating the region - the union.

The United States has about 50% of the world's wealth, and this gap must be maintained.

To achieve this, certain measures are necessary. For example, it is not right for the poorest country in the world to declare a revolution... because that is like a rotten apple that spoils its surroundings. Revolutions are suppressed locally, and if not, there is no obstacle to military intervention, blockade, and economic sanctions on some countries that deviate from the path.

These goals were actually started to be achieved. There were the McCarthy era witch hunts in the United States, the Vietnam War, and other wars. And with all this, the American media says nothing because it is a one-way street... and anyone who criticizes American policy leaves and does not return. (Perhaps this silencing of voices has decreased over the years, as scandals and leaks have followed some American presidents).

Regarding the Second Gulf War: America opposed any diplomatic solution to the Gulf War, and by rejecting it, America achieved its main goals in the Gulf. It seized the oil sources in the Middle East and reaped its huge profits to improve its economy and that of its ally, Britain. After that, there was a burden on America, which was to maintain the situation in the entire region, including Saddam Hussein against any popular, Shiite, or Kurdish uprisings. But it did not succeed in that.

Imposing the American system on the Third World exceeds its economic ability, so Japan and Europe must contribute to the costs of maintaining that system that serves their interests. Generally, using force to control the Third World is the last resort. There is the International Monetary Fund, which is much cheaper, followed by American intelligence and naval operations, but there must always be an allusion to a strong grip with a practical statement from time to time.

The Arabs helped the United States a lot... especially in combating the Soviet Union. Despite sending mujahideen, an agreement was reached to lower oil prices in preparation for eliminating the Soviet Union. Similarly, the United States supported the first Russian president after the breakup of the Soviet Union, Boris Yeltsin, under whose rule Russia completely collapsed.

And in all this, the American people are very ignorant. Some polls show that when America invaded Haiti, a percentage of the people do not know what Haiti is, despite what Washington says about it being a threat to the United States!

This is almost the American approach and line that has not changed to this day.

Some excerpts from the book that I liked:

*When a government succeeds in achieving exploitation and makes the islands live in blatant wealth in the midst of a sea of abject poverty, then it is necessary to find a way to deceive the people and divert their attention. There are few ways, and most of them are traditional, working on scaring the people from a terrible enemy who is about to pounce on us, while reassuring our vigilant leaders who are doing everything in their power to save us.*

Chomsky describes the attempt to change the American people and media:

*But all that can be changed, and this requires a cultural, social, and institutional change and a change from a formal democratic system to a real democracy that goes beyond the periodic elections that bring those who serve the interests of the rich and business.*

*Any system of government, even if it is a fascist dictatorship, depends on the pressure of its people.* I say: The nationalities know.

- Western experts believe that it is impossible to transform the underlying economic structure without changing the political superstructure.

- There will be no freedom of speech if one side monopolizes the media or educational field, or if one side suppresses the presentation of its facts and point of view.

- Literary genius cannot be revealed if there is no freedom of opinion.

- Existing laws are not sufficient to remove the belief of the white man in his superiority and superiority over other races.

*Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamed asks: If local products do not have a chance of success in the small local markets, do they have any chance of competing in the large global markets? Doesn't that mean eliminating local industries?*

A very beautiful book by Tocqueville.

I can affirm that many people's words regarding me are not logical. It is not reasonable that the more democratic a nation becomes, the less interested it is in politics or at least the more its trust in the government decreases, and thus the easier it is to laugh at it.

Tocqueville's work offers valuable insights into the complex relationship between democracy and various aspects of society.

It challenges the common assumption that as democracy progresses, people become less engaged in political affairs.

Perhaps, instead, it is a matter of how democracy is implemented and the quality of governance.

A well-functioning democratic system should inspire trust and encourage active participation.

It is important to analyze and understand these dynamics to ensure the healthy development of democratic societies.

Tocqueville's ideas continue to be relevant today and can serve as a guide for further exploration and improvement.

The American politics that arouses them and is worthy of their contemplation has stumped them. They try to reach a stage of perception that is accompanied by a deep understanding of American politics.

Her positions are diverse anyway! Whenever the advocate of democracy calls for freedom of opinion and expression, she is the first to be silenced in many countries around her. And when America calls for freedom and democracy, it realizes that each of them has a meaning detached by it other than that written in the constitutions on which we were raised!

She thought, asked, was amazed, and reached the peak of astonishment at that politics, but because of the wonder and the world is ruled by money, media, and power!

Thus, he narrated and innovated in the wonderful formulation of politics. We are immersed in the sequence of Tomasik, taking a lot of disasters, mixed crimes, and American division in the standards!

The pages of the book lead you and between the lines in another world, where the American politics disappears from reality a little, trying to understand the truth of the American people.

I think the book is much less than what it promises.

Perhaps even in the way it is presented, which is not suitable for Noam Chomsky's style.

That means in the usual there is a "theory" followed by analysis and its historical examples.

The book randomly presents entire sections of the story about the experiences of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua... Perhaps it is useful for those who have never read about these experiences before.

Perhaps the real benefit that came out of the book is the answer to the question: Why was Japan left to rise again? And how was control over it enforced...?

And the answer was that after its destruction, either it was left to rebuild itself and fall under the long arm of the regional powers, or it itself became an additional power for the United States in the region, and the US controlled it by controlling the oil that is pumped into Japan. Just power balances in the region.

In general, I find the book very weak, "scientifically". Perhaps it is just a general history. Perhaps all of that is because it was assembled from lectures (lectures for Chomsky) and not written by himself. Because otherwise, there would be organization and proof of the theory with history....

Reading this book is a must for everyone who wants to know how the world was run in the second half of the 20th century.

The 20th century was a period of significant change and transformation, and the second half of the century was no exception.

This book provides a detailed and comprehensive account of the events, trends, and developments that shaped the world during this time.

From the end of World War II to the dawn of the new millennium, readers will gain insights into the political, economic, social, and cultural forces that influenced global affairs.

Whether you are a history buff, a student of international relations, or simply someone who is interested in understanding the world we live in, this book is an essential read.

It offers a unique perspective on a crucial period in human history and will help you to better appreciate the challenges and opportunities that we face today.

**Title: An Analysis of "Noam Chomsky's Writings"**

After a beautiful introductory loan from Professor Mohamed Hussein Heikal to the author "Noam Chomsky", the famous American thinker and linguist with known humanist positions, the author begins to present the idea of the book. It is based on refuting the claims of the American administration in supporting democracy and human rights in the world. These accusations quickly fade away when some countries attempt full independence from American control, challenging its hegemony and exiting what is called the "common space" of American interests. The alliance of capital, politics, and the media readily accepts sacrificing the lofty ideals it proclaims and even goes beyond that to ridicule the capabilities, dignity, and lives of millions in order to maintain the interests of the implementing upper classes within the United States. The ordinary American citizen remains in a state of subjugation and exploitation by the huge media propaganda that portrays these violations - if they reach that - as a just act carried out by the vigilant American administration to protect its security from the threats of others. The author "Noam Chomsky" provides a large number of examples of the truth of American politics in the world in the first part of the book. The translator added a second important part that talks about the truth of American society and its democratic mechanism. The book is about a hundred pages long but is very important for understanding some political aspects that the Western media - or those who praise it - do not show in their true form.

This book presents Chomsky in a more accessible light.

The publisher's claim on the back that political books need not be dull holds true here. The need for brevity has compelled Chomsky to strip his ideas to the essentials. His sarcasm and irony cut deep, and his details are far more concise than in his longer works.

However, I don't recommend this as an introduction to Chomsky's political writing. The brevity can easily lead to incredulity turning into dismissive skepticism. What he writes is so at odds with the official historical myths we accept as truth that after several debunking claims, it's easy to think he's just a left-wing extremist with an overactive imagination. Yes, references are appended, but the lack of footnoting specific ones creates a credibility gap.

Ironically, and affirming Chomsky's observation that concision is America's most effective form of censorship, the book's brevity also makes it highly quotable.

For example, "Free trade is fine for economics departments and newspaper editorials, but nobody in the corporate world or the government takes the doctrines too seriously. The parts of the US economy that are able to compete internationally are primarily the state subsidized ones: capital intensive agriculture (agribusiness as it is called), high tech industry, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, etc (p.13)."

Another quotable passage is: "Broader studies by economist Edward Herman reveal a close correlation worldwide between torture and US aid, and also provide the explanation: both correlate independently with improving the climate for business operations. In comparison with that guiding moral principle, such matters as torture and butchery pale into insignificance (p.29)."

This book is filled with such gems. But they only have descriptive power if you've read enough of Chomsky to know that terms like "butchery" and "torture" are not exaggerations when applied to American foreign policy. Instead, they're an ironic understatement of the scale of American brutality, often approaching genocidal proportions.

It's a fun read, but it offers nothing new to those familiar with Chomsky except sound bites. And it's likely to be seen by newcomers as confirmation that he's a kook, reducing him to an eloquent conspiratorialist on the fringes.

I've included some citations from the book in my blog. If you're curious, go to What Uncle Sam Really Wants — citations.

The brilliant professor Noam Chomsky and his renowned followers have long been critical of American foreign policy and Israel's extremist policies. In this book, he reveals the "not-so-hidden" secrets of America's policy and its hegemony over Latin America and some regions in the Middle East through force, arms, bribery, and corruption.

Professor Noam explains the false democracy of the United States and how it has intervened in Haiti, Panama, Nicaragua, Iraq, and other countries whenever a people tried to improve their living conditions. He also describes how the American public opinion is manipulated. Additionally, he discloses the ranks that America paid to drug dealers and arms merchants to rule their countries with an iron fist.

Those who read this book will understand what is happening in the Arab Spring and what happened in the countries after the overthrow of their leaders. America doesn't care who rules as long as the ruler respects its interests. Otherwise, under any pretext and name, it will destroy the country and set it back years.

This book is very dangerous, and I recommend it to everyone.

The situation is very depressing indeed.

It makes one feel a sense of heaviness and disappointment. However, I guess that's precisely why they say ignorance is bliss.

If we were completely unaware of certain harsh realities or difficult circumstances, perhaps we wouldn't experience such intense emotions of depression.

But then again, being ignorant also means missing out on the opportunity to understand and potentially make positive changes.

It's a complex and somewhat paradoxical concept.

On one hand, we might long for the simplicity and lack of worry that comes with ignorance.

On the other hand, we know that true growth and progress often come from facing the facts and dealing with the challenges head-on.

So, while the current state of affairs may be depressing, it also serves as a reminder that we need to find a balance between being informed and protecting our mental well-being.

Maybe there is a way to navigate through the difficult times while still maintaining a glimmer of hope and a sense of inner peace.

What does Mr. Sam want? There are books that no library should be without, especially for those who strive to understand the many political puzzles that surround us.

This book reveals a very important part of the United States' policy, especially its foreign policy, and how it deals with those who step out of line and the world order.

It also shows how the American media deals with the allies of the United States who cover up their crimes and how they distort the image of those who oppose the United States or show any signs of patriotism and loyalty to their people.

The first edition of this book was published in 1998. But when we look at the steps that Chomsky outlined in his book and that the United States follows to get rid of every ruler who tries to break away from American dependence or implement some kind of social, economic, and political reform,

we find that these steps have been implemented with their full force since the January 25, 2011 revolution. These steps are as follows: The United States has always worked to establish relations with the military in foreign countries as a means to overthrow governments that step out of line.

Of course, the military begins by creating an economic disaster, usually following the instructions of American advisors, and far from that, they hand over the problems to the civilians.

The debts and economic chaos created by the military create the ground for the conditions and rules of the International Monetary Fund, unless there are national political forces with popular support that try to intervene. In this case, the military returns to restore stability.

The repeated story begins with the United States imposing an economic embargo to destroy the local economy, and of course, the heaviest burden falls on the poor. Then the people hate the ruler and wish for his departure. The stage is then set for a military coup.

As I was reading this book, which describes and explains what happened in Egypt as if it were published recently, I am certain that this book will change the beliefs of many people and increase the certainty of others.