This book is a remarkable collaborative work jointly created by Gilbert Achcar and Noam Chomsky.

It is presented in the form of a series of moderated discussions between these two prominent leftist intellectuals. Throughout the book, they explore a wide range of topics pertaining to American foreign policy in the Middle East.

However, reading this book requires some effort as they frequently mention relatively esoteric organizations and leaders without providing much introduction. This is understandable given that they are two experts delving deep into their shared field.

Overall, it is a decent book that offers valuable insights. Nevertheless, readers should be cautious and pay close attention while reading as there are a few logical fallacies hidden within their discussions. In particular, I noticed that Chomsky sometimes employs straw man arguments to support his opinions. This serves as a reminder for readers to approach the content with a critical eye and evaluate the arguments presented objectively.

Despite these minor flaws, the book remains a worthwhile read for those interested in understanding the complex relationship between American foreign policy and the Middle East.

A very erudite scholar emerged, delving deep into the affairs of the Middle East. His research uncovered the complex web of historical, political, and cultural aspects that have shaped this region. As he delved further, he couldn't help but be amazed by the extent of imperialism's influence. The actions and policies of powerful nations had left an indelible mark on the Middle East, affecting its people, economies, and social structures. The scholar's work shed light on the long-lasting consequences of imperialism,引发了人们对该地区历史和现状的深入思考。His findings served as a reminder of the importance of understanding the past in order to build a more just and peaceful future for the Middle East and the world.

Noam Chomsky and Gilbert Achcar's "Perilous Power: The Middle East and U.S. Foreign Policy; Dialogues on Terror, Democracy, War, and Justice, Expanded Edition" is a remarkable work.

It offers a wealth of information for those eager to understand the complex political landscape of the Middle East. The book stems from a three-day conversation in January 2006 between the two scholars, moderated by Stephen Shalom. The final text was carefully edited and filled with numerous footnotes. The edition I read includes an epilogue written six months later and a postscript two years later.

The topics covered are extensive, ranging from terrorism and fundamentalism to U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the situations in various countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and more.

The dialogue between Chomsky and Achcar is truly eye-opening. They argue that the U.S. aims to control the world economy by controlling the oil supply. This motivation leads to actions that undermine democracy, such as interfering in elections and toppling leaders.

My favorite section was on fundamentalism. They explain how the U.S. supported Islamic fundamentalists to create instability and prevent the rise of powerful secular nationalists in the Middle East.

The book also delves into U.S. fundamentalism, suggesting that it is being used by the wealthy to shift the focus of voters from important issues to religious crusades.

Overall, the book is highly readable, but it can get quite in-depth. A glossary, map, timeline, and appendix would have been helpful. Nevertheless, considering the current situation, I highly recommend this book to everyone.

The events discussed in this book by Noam Chomsky and Gilbert Achcar are somewhat outdated. However, you can learn here about the governance of the US as a superpower and how it uses its power to influence the events in the world, particularly in the Middle East.

It is difficult to read this because it is thick and there are many names that are not familiar to me. But there are a few that I recognize because of the world news I have read. But in summary, this book shows how bad the US really is and how they are the real terrorists and not the Arabs they call terrorists.

One thing that stuck with me is what Chomsky said: The United States supports democracy if and only if it conforms to US strategic and economic objectives.

The US always talks about defending democracy, but in reality, it is one of the most undemocratic countries in the world. We don't really feel this in the Philippines because we are an ally of the US, but if we go against their will and if there is oil here, surely the US's treatment of us will change.

Basically, the US's interference in the Middle East, its alliance with Saudi Arabia and Israel, can be traced to one thing only: oil.

Oil is the main driver of industry in the US or anywhere. And if you are a strong country, of course, you need a consistent source of oil, and that is the countries in the Middle East.

So when they wage war or support a country, it always has something to do with oil. But what they will say in the media is a) to promote democracy or b) to combat terrorism, but that's just an echo. It's really all about oil.

The discussion by Chomsky and Achcar about the Israel-Palestine conflict was also an eye-opener for me. The US is also shitty here for supporting Israel. Just as Hitler killed the Jews in WWII, that's basically what the Israeli Jews are doing to the Palestinians in Lebanon, Gaza, etc. They are massacring the non-Jews and stealing their land and livelihood. The Jews in Israel are also very cruel, in fairness. They use anti-Semitism to their advantage and to justify their killing of the Palestinians.

And of course, they are supported by the US. Because the role and location of Israel are important for the US to maintain its hegemony and control in the Middle East, especially to fight the power of those they consider enemies there, like Iraq, Iran, Syria, Egypt, etc. And if you really think about it, the reason there are so many "terrorists" is because they are just defending themselves against the foreign Americans, who, according to Chomsky, are the real terrorists.

Take note, Chomsky is American.

When it comes to the Middle East issue, Achcar is very good at explaining. He really studied and knows all the events by heart. When it comes to US policies and cruelty, Chomsky is the expert. They are both very good. I learned a lot even though I am not affected by the events in the Middle East.

This book provides an excellent perspective on the moral clarity and intellectual integrity that Noam Chomsky has dedicated his life to advocating.

Although Chomsky typically concentrates on international politics, I have always found it interesting when he discusses domestic issues, as demonstrated in the passage I highlighted regarding the rise of religious fervor in America.

He points out that the fundamentalist mobilization has taken place during a distinct period in American economic history. For approximately twenty-five years, real wages for the majority have either stagnated or declined, and real median family incomes for the majority are steady or perhaps even decreasing. This has never occurred before. There were events like the Great Depression, but never twenty-five years of stagnation for the majority without a serious economic disruption. Working hours have increased significantly, social benefits have decreased, and indebtedness has grown enormously.

To a large extent, the way this has been addressed is by mobilizing the Christian fundamentalist sectors, which have always existed, and transforming them into an active political force. During the same period, the discourse, focus, and so on have been shifted to the issues that concern the fundamentalists but are of only marginal importance to those who own and run the society.

In fact, if you look at the attitudes of CEOs, they are what are considered liberal. They are not very different from college professors. And as long as they are in charge of the social and economic policies, they are fine with the population being obsessed with "evolution theory" and gay rights. For example, after the last election in 2004, the business press was describing the "euphoria" in boardrooms, not because they were against gay marriage. Some were, some weren't, and many of them or their children are gay anyway. What they knew was that it was a free run for business.

Chomsky also mentions that there was a real shift with the administration of Jimmy Carter. Before Carter, nobody really cared much whether the president was religious. Did anyone care whether Lyndon Johnson went to church every Sunday? But Carter, who was probably sincere, somehow taught party managers that if you put on a pious face and talk about how you're lusting in your heart, feel guilty, and saw Jesus, that's a way of appealing to a large voting bloc. Since Carter, every presidential candidate has pretended to have a religious experience. Even Bill Clinton, who is probably about as religious as Chomsky, made sure to be seen every week singing in the Baptist church.

So far so good. However, what follows is a truly scary eye opener.

As you read this, keep in mind that you will never be able to un-know this information.

It has the potential to change your perspective and make you question many things you thought you knew.

The details presented here are not for the faint of heart.

They may shock you, make you feel uncomfortable, or even leave you with a sense of unease.

But it is important to face the truth, no matter how difficult it may be.

By doing so, we can gain a better understanding of the world around us and make more informed decisions.

So, take a deep breath and prepare yourself for what lies ahead.

Once you start reading, there is no turning back.

In order to understand the real US foreign policy, this book must be read by everyone interested in politics.

The fact that the mainstream of our view of the world is formed in the way that the media indoctrinates us actually shows how little and differently we really understand the world.

To understand that US politics is actually carried out within the framework of US strategic goals, it is necessary to read this book.

In order to achieve US strategic goals, it seems reasonable to overthrow democratically elected regimes if necessary, support terrorism if necessary, or even use nuclear weapons if necessary.

You will see that the US, which has a radical foreign policy and implements the slogan of "the ends justify the means", is the most pragmatic and ugliest global actor.

This is a very nice and practical book that gives clear answers without being overly complicated. It doesn't use narration for the purpose of artificial addition. It is also designed as a confrontation and a discussion between Gilad and Naomi. So it is a good and easy-to-use book.

Regarding the content, the issue of the right of return of Palestinian refugees, the discussion didn't give a position, and the reader feels that Naomi is hesitant to present or support decisions other than her own. As for the other topics, the facts presented are convincing and practical for the reader. Having Gilad and Naomi in one book is an achievement so that they can be read together.

The last and best book I did read in 2014 was truly a remarkable piece of literature.

It took me on an unforgettable journey, filled with vivid characters and a captivating plot.

The author's writing style was engaging and immersive, making it difficult for me to put the book down.

I found myself completely invested in the story, experiencing a range of emotions along the way.

This book not only entertained me but also made me think deeply about various aspects of life.

It was a thought-provoking and inspiring read that left a lasting impression on me.

I would highly recommend this book to anyone looking for a great read that will both entertain and enlighten.

It is truly a gem that I will cherish and remember for a long time to come.

The original article is not provided, so I can't rewrite and expand it specifically. However, I can give you a general example of how to expand an article.

Let's say the original article is: "The cat is sitting on the mat. It looks cute."

Expanded version:

The small and fluffy cat is sitting peacefully on the soft mat. Its big round eyes are looking around curiously, and its little nose is twitching. It has a short and smooth fur that shines in the sunlight. The cat's posture is very relaxed, and it seems to be enjoying the comfortable moment. It really looks extremely cute, making anyone who sees it can't help but smile.

You can provide the original article, and I will help you rewrite and expand it according to your requirements.

I relied on this for my dissertation way back in the day.

It was such an important resource at that time, helping me to gather valuable information and build a solid foundation for my research.

However, as the years have passed, very little of it remains in my memory.

I find myself wondering if it has aged well.

Has the content become outdated? Are the ideas still relevant in today's context?

These questions linger in my mind, making me curious to revisit this old source and see how it fares.

Perhaps it will surprise me and still hold some hidden gems of knowledge.

Or maybe it will serve as a reminder of how much things have changed and how our understanding has evolved over time.

Only by taking a closer look will I be able to find out.

A Lucid Piercing Analysis of Middle Eastern Issues and US/Israeli Policy in the Region

The Middle East has long been a complex and volatile region, with a web of political, economic, and social issues. The policies of the United States and Israel in the region have had a significant impact on the situation. This analysis aims to provide a clear and in-depth understanding of these issues.

The US has often been accused of interfering in the internal affairs of Middle Eastern countries, supporting certain regimes while opposing others. Its military presence in the region has also been a source of controversy. Israel, on the other hand, has been involved in numerous conflicts with its Arab neighbors, particularly over the issue of Palestine.

Understanding the motives and actions of the US and Israel in the Middle East is crucial for anyone interested in the region. InshaAllah, a more comprehensive review will be forthcoming, delving deeper into the historical, political, and cultural factors that have shaped the current situation.