Perilous Power: The Middle East & US Foreign Policy

... Show More
s/t: Dialogues on Terror, Democracy, War & Justice
The volatile Middle East is the site of vast resources, profound passions, frequent crises, and long-standing conflicts, as well as a major source of international tensions and a key site of direct U.S. intervention.

Two of the most astute analysts of this part of the world are Noam Chomsky, the preeminent critic of U.S. foreign policy, and Gilbert Achcar, a leading specialist of the Middle East who lived in that region for many years. In their new book, Chomsky and Achcar bring a keen understanding of the internal dynamics of the Middle East and of the role of the United States, taking up all the key questions of interest to concerned citizens, including such topics as terrorism, fundamentalism, conspiracies, oil, democracy, self-determination, anti-Semitism, and anti-Arab racism, as well as the war in Afghanistan, the invasion and occupation of Iraq, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the sources of U.S. foreign policy. This book provides the best readable introduction for all who wish to understand the complex issues related to the Middle East from a perspective dedicated to peace and justice.

242 pages, Hardcover

First published September 1,2006

About the author

... Show More
Avram Noam Chomsky is an American professor and public intellectual known for his work in linguistics, political activism, and social criticism. Sometimes called "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He is a laureate professor of linguistics at the University of Arizona and an institute professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics. In addition to his work in linguistics, since the 1960s Chomsky has been an influential voice on the American left as a consistent critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, and corporate influence on political institutions and the media.
Born to Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants in Philadelphia, Chomsky developed an early interest in anarchism from alternative bookstores in New York City. He studied at the University of Pennsylvania. During his postgraduate work in the Harvard Society of Fellows, Chomsky developed the theory of transformational grammar for which he earned his doctorate in 1955. That year he began teaching at MIT, and in 1957 emerged as a significant figure in linguistics with his landmark work Syntactic Structures, which played a major role in remodeling the study of language. From 1958 to 1959 Chomsky was a National Science Foundation fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. He created or co-created the universal grammar theory, the generative grammar theory, the Chomsky hierarchy, and the minimalist program. Chomsky also played a pivotal role in the decline of linguistic behaviorism, and was particularly critical of the work of B.F. Skinner.
An outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which he saw as an act of American imperialism, in 1967 Chomsky rose to national attention for his anti-war essay "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Becoming associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism and placed on President Richard M. Nixon's list of political opponents. While expanding his work in linguistics over subsequent decades, he also became involved in the linguistics wars. In collaboration with Edward S. Herman, Chomsky later articulated the propaganda model of media criticism in Manufacturing Consent, and worked to expose the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. His defense of unconditional freedom of speech, including that of Holocaust denial, generated significant controversy in the Faurisson affair of the 1980s. Chomsky's commentary on the Cambodian genocide and the Bosnian genocide also generated controversy. Since retiring from active teaching at MIT, he has continued his vocal political activism, including opposing the 2003 invasion of Iraq and supporting the Occupy movement. An anti-Zionist, Chomsky considers Israel's treatment of Palestinians to be worse than South African–style apartheid, and criticizes U.S. support for Israel.
Chomsky is widely recognized as having helped to spark the cognitive revolution in the human sciences, contributing to the development of a new cognitivistic framework for the study of language and the mind. Chomsky remains a leading critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, U.S. involvement and Israel's role in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and mass media. Chomsky and his ideas are highly influential in the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movements. Since 2017, he has been Agnese Helms Haury Chair in the Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizona.

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 40 votes)
5 stars
13(33%)
4 stars
14(35%)
3 stars
13(33%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
40 reviews All reviews
July 15,2025
... Show More
This book is a remarkable collaborative work jointly created by Gilbert Achcar and Noam Chomsky.

It is presented in the form of a series of moderated discussions between these two prominent leftist intellectuals. Throughout the book, they explore a wide range of topics pertaining to American foreign policy in the Middle East.

However, reading this book requires some effort as they frequently mention relatively esoteric organizations and leaders without providing much introduction. This is understandable given that they are two experts delving deep into their shared field.

Overall, it is a decent book that offers valuable insights. Nevertheless, readers should be cautious and pay close attention while reading as there are a few logical fallacies hidden within their discussions. In particular, I noticed that Chomsky sometimes employs straw man arguments to support his opinions. This serves as a reminder for readers to approach the content with a critical eye and evaluate the arguments presented objectively.

Despite these minor flaws, the book remains a worthwhile read for those interested in understanding the complex relationship between American foreign policy and the Middle East.
July 15,2025
... Show More

A very erudite scholar emerged, delving deep into the affairs of the Middle East. His research uncovered the complex web of historical, political, and cultural aspects that have shaped this region. As he delved further, he couldn't help but be amazed by the extent of imperialism's influence. The actions and policies of powerful nations had left an indelible mark on the Middle East, affecting its people, economies, and social structures. The scholar's work shed light on the long-lasting consequences of imperialism,引发了人们对该地区历史和现状的深入思考。His findings served as a reminder of the importance of understanding the past in order to build a more just and peaceful future for the Middle East and the world.

July 15,2025
... Show More
Noam Chomsky and Gilbert Achcar's "Perilous Power: The Middle East and U.S. Foreign Policy; Dialogues on Terror, Democracy, War, and Justice, Expanded Edition" is a remarkable work.

It offers a wealth of information for those eager to understand the complex political landscape of the Middle East. The book stems from a three-day conversation in January 2006 between the two scholars, moderated by Stephen Shalom. The final text was carefully edited and filled with numerous footnotes. The edition I read includes an epilogue written six months later and a postscript two years later.

The topics covered are extensive, ranging from terrorism and fundamentalism to U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the situations in various countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and more.

The dialogue between Chomsky and Achcar is truly eye-opening. They argue that the U.S. aims to control the world economy by controlling the oil supply. This motivation leads to actions that undermine democracy, such as interfering in elections and toppling leaders.

My favorite section was on fundamentalism. They explain how the U.S. supported Islamic fundamentalists to create instability and prevent the rise of powerful secular nationalists in the Middle East.

The book also delves into U.S. fundamentalism, suggesting that it is being used by the wealthy to shift the focus of voters from important issues to religious crusades.

Overall, the book is highly readable, but it can get quite in-depth. A glossary, map, timeline, and appendix would have been helpful. Nevertheless, considering the current situation, I highly recommend this book to everyone.

July 15,2025
... Show More
The events discussed in this book by Noam Chomsky and Gilbert Achcar are somewhat outdated. However, you can learn here about the governance of the US as a superpower and how it uses its power to influence the events in the world, particularly in the Middle East.

It is difficult to read this because it is thick and there are many names that are not familiar to me. But there are a few that I recognize because of the world news I have read. But in summary, this book shows how bad the US really is and how they are the real terrorists and not the Arabs they call terrorists.

One thing that stuck with me is what Chomsky said: The United States supports democracy if and only if it conforms to US strategic and economic objectives.

The US always talks about defending democracy, but in reality, it is one of the most undemocratic countries in the world. We don't really feel this in the Philippines because we are an ally of the US, but if we go against their will and if there is oil here, surely the US's treatment of us will change.

Basically, the US's interference in the Middle East, its alliance with Saudi Arabia and Israel, can be traced to one thing only: oil.

Oil is the main driver of industry in the US or anywhere. And if you are a strong country, of course, you need a consistent source of oil, and that is the countries in the Middle East.

So when they wage war or support a country, it always has something to do with oil. But what they will say in the media is a) to promote democracy or b) to combat terrorism, but that's just an echo. It's really all about oil.

The discussion by Chomsky and Achcar about the Israel-Palestine conflict was also an eye-opener for me. The US is also shitty here for supporting Israel. Just as Hitler killed the Jews in WWII, that's basically what the Israeli Jews are doing to the Palestinians in Lebanon, Gaza, etc. They are massacring the non-Jews and stealing their land and livelihood. The Jews in Israel are also very cruel, in fairness. They use anti-Semitism to their advantage and to justify their killing of the Palestinians.

And of course, they are supported by the US. Because the role and location of Israel are important for the US to maintain its hegemony and control in the Middle East, especially to fight the power of those they consider enemies there, like Iraq, Iran, Syria, Egypt, etc. And if you really think about it, the reason there are so many "terrorists" is because they are just defending themselves against the foreign Americans, who, according to Chomsky, are the real terrorists.

Take note, Chomsky is American.

When it comes to the Middle East issue, Achcar is very good at explaining. He really studied and knows all the events by heart. When it comes to US policies and cruelty, Chomsky is the expert. They are both very good. I learned a lot even though I am not affected by the events in the Middle East.
July 15,2025
... Show More
This book provides an excellent perspective on the moral clarity and intellectual integrity that Noam Chomsky has dedicated his life to advocating.

Although Chomsky typically concentrates on international politics, I have always found it interesting when he discusses domestic issues, as demonstrated in the passage I highlighted regarding the rise of religious fervor in America.

He points out that the fundamentalist mobilization has taken place during a distinct period in American economic history. For approximately twenty-five years, real wages for the majority have either stagnated or declined, and real median family incomes for the majority are steady or perhaps even decreasing. This has never occurred before. There were events like the Great Depression, but never twenty-five years of stagnation for the majority without a serious economic disruption. Working hours have increased significantly, social benefits have decreased, and indebtedness has grown enormously.

To a large extent, the way this has been addressed is by mobilizing the Christian fundamentalist sectors, which have always existed, and transforming them into an active political force. During the same period, the discourse, focus, and so on have been shifted to the issues that concern the fundamentalists but are of only marginal importance to those who own and run the society.

In fact, if you look at the attitudes of CEOs, they are what are considered liberal. They are not very different from college professors. And as long as they are in charge of the social and economic policies, they are fine with the population being obsessed with "evolution theory" and gay rights. For example, after the last election in 2004, the business press was describing the "euphoria" in boardrooms, not because they were against gay marriage. Some were, some weren't, and many of them or their children are gay anyway. What they knew was that it was a free run for business.

Chomsky also mentions that there was a real shift with the administration of Jimmy Carter. Before Carter, nobody really cared much whether the president was religious. Did anyone care whether Lyndon Johnson went to church every Sunday? But Carter, who was probably sincere, somehow taught party managers that if you put on a pious face and talk about how you're lusting in your heart, feel guilty, and saw Jesus, that's a way of appealing to a large voting bloc. Since Carter, every presidential candidate has pretended to have a religious experience. Even Bill Clinton, who is probably about as religious as Chomsky, made sure to be seen every week singing in the Baptist church.
July 15,2025
... Show More
So far so good. However, what follows is a truly scary eye opener.

As you read this, keep in mind that you will never be able to un-know this information.

It has the potential to change your perspective and make you question many things you thought you knew.

The details presented here are not for the faint of heart.

They may shock you, make you feel uncomfortable, or even leave you with a sense of unease.

But it is important to face the truth, no matter how difficult it may be.

By doing so, we can gain a better understanding of the world around us and make more informed decisions.

So, take a deep breath and prepare yourself for what lies ahead.

Once you start reading, there is no turning back.

July 15,2025
... Show More
In order to understand the real US foreign policy, this book must be read by everyone interested in politics.

The fact that the mainstream of our view of the world is formed in the way that the media indoctrinates us actually shows how little and differently we really understand the world.

To understand that US politics is actually carried out within the framework of US strategic goals, it is necessary to read this book.

In order to achieve US strategic goals, it seems reasonable to overthrow democratically elected regimes if necessary, support terrorism if necessary, or even use nuclear weapons if necessary.

You will see that the US, which has a radical foreign policy and implements the slogan of "the ends justify the means", is the most pragmatic and ugliest global actor.
July 15,2025
... Show More
This is a very nice and practical book that gives clear answers without being overly complicated. It doesn't use narration for the purpose of artificial addition. It is also designed as a confrontation and a discussion between Gilad and Naomi. So it is a good and easy-to-use book.

Regarding the content, the issue of the right of return of Palestinian refugees, the discussion didn't give a position, and the reader feels that Naomi is hesitant to present or support decisions other than her own. As for the other topics, the facts presented are convincing and practical for the reader. Having Gilad and Naomi in one book is an achievement so that they can be read together.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.