Language and Mind

... Show More
This is the third edition of Chomsky's outstanding collection of essays on language and mind, first published in 2006. The first six chapters, originally published in the 1960s, made a groundbreaking contribution to linguistic theory. This edition complements them with an additional chapter and a new preface, bringing Chomsky's influential approach into the twenty-first century. Chapters 1-6 present Chomsky's early work on the nature and acquisition of language as a genetically endowed, biological system (Universal Grammar), through the rules and principles of which we acquire an internalized knowledge (I-language). Over the past fifty years, this framework has sparked an explosion of inquiry into a wide range of languages, and has yielded some major theoretical questions. The final chapter revisits the key issues, reviewing the 'biolinguistic' approach that has guided Chomsky's work from its origins to the present day, and raising some novel and exciting challenges for the study of language and mind.

206 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,1968

About the author

... Show More
Avram Noam Chomsky is an American professor and public intellectual known for his work in linguistics, political activism, and social criticism. Sometimes called "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He is a laureate professor of linguistics at the University of Arizona and an institute professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics. In addition to his work in linguistics, since the 1960s Chomsky has been an influential voice on the American left as a consistent critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, and corporate influence on political institutions and the media.
Born to Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants in Philadelphia, Chomsky developed an early interest in anarchism from alternative bookstores in New York City. He studied at the University of Pennsylvania. During his postgraduate work in the Harvard Society of Fellows, Chomsky developed the theory of transformational grammar for which he earned his doctorate in 1955. That year he began teaching at MIT, and in 1957 emerged as a significant figure in linguistics with his landmark work Syntactic Structures, which played a major role in remodeling the study of language. From 1958 to 1959 Chomsky was a National Science Foundation fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. He created or co-created the universal grammar theory, the generative grammar theory, the Chomsky hierarchy, and the minimalist program. Chomsky also played a pivotal role in the decline of linguistic behaviorism, and was particularly critical of the work of B.F. Skinner.
An outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which he saw as an act of American imperialism, in 1967 Chomsky rose to national attention for his anti-war essay "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Becoming associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism and placed on President Richard M. Nixon's list of political opponents. While expanding his work in linguistics over subsequent decades, he also became involved in the linguistics wars. In collaboration with Edward S. Herman, Chomsky later articulated the propaganda model of media criticism in Manufacturing Consent, and worked to expose the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. His defense of unconditional freedom of speech, including that of Holocaust denial, generated significant controversy in the Faurisson affair of the 1980s. Chomsky's commentary on the Cambodian genocide and the Bosnian genocide also generated controversy. Since retiring from active teaching at MIT, he has continued his vocal political activism, including opposing the 2003 invasion of Iraq and supporting the Occupy movement. An anti-Zionist, Chomsky considers Israel's treatment of Palestinians to be worse than South African–style apartheid, and criticizes U.S. support for Israel.
Chomsky is widely recognized as having helped to spark the cognitive revolution in the human sciences, contributing to the development of a new cognitivistic framework for the study of language and the mind. Chomsky remains a leading critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, U.S. involvement and Israel's role in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and mass media. Chomsky and his ideas are highly influential in the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movements. Since 2017, he has been Agnese Helms Haury Chair in the Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizona.

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 87 votes)
5 stars
29(33%)
4 stars
25(29%)
3 stars
33(38%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
87 reviews All reviews
July 15,2025
... Show More

Those who know me are well aware of how I truly feel about Chomsky. His ideas and theories have had a profound impact on my intellectual journey. However, as my master's degree is almost coming to an end, there is a sense of both excitement and a tinge of melancholy. The years of intense study and exploration have been filled with challenges and growth. I have delved deep into various academic disciplines, constantly striving to expand my knowledge and understanding. But now, with the finish line in sight, I find myself reflecting on all that I have accomplished and all that lies ahead. The future holds both opportunities and uncertainties, but I am ready to embrace whatever comes my way. Hey ho, here's to the next chapter of my life!

July 15,2025
... Show More
**Title: The Mysterious Nature of Language and Human Intelligence**

Darwin's rhetorical question about why thought should be considered more wonderful than gravity highlights the complexity of human intelligence. Normal human intelligence can acquire knowledge through internal resources, using sense data to construct a cognitive system based on independent concepts and principles. It can also generate new thoughts and express them in novel ways, transcending training and experience.


Descartes correctly observed that language is a species-specific human possession. Even at low or pathological levels of intelligence, humans have a command of language that apes cannot attain, despite the latter's problem-solving abilities in other respects.


A person's knowledge of language is often seen as a set of stored patterns, overlearned through repetition and training, with innovation being at most a matter of analogy. However, we are still far from understanding what enables humans to speak in an innovative, free, appropriate, and coherent way.


In fact, sentence formation is not strictly a matter of langue but rather belongs to parole, outside the scope of linguistics proper. It is a process of free creation, constrained only by the rules governing word forms and sound patterns.


Accordingly, knowledge of language develops slowly through repetition and training, its complexity resulting from the proliferation of simple elements rather than deeper principles of mental organization. The person who has acquired knowledge of a language has internalized a system of rules relating sound and meaning.


Linguistics, thus characterized, is a subfield of psychology dealing with these aspects of the mind. Knowledge of a language involves the ability to assign deep and surface structures to an infinite range of sentences, relate them appropriately, and assign semantic and phonetic interpretations.


It is clear that the surface structure of language can be misleading and uninformative, and our knowledge of language involves more abstract properties not directly indicated in the surface structure.


We live in the age of "behavioral science," yet anyone studying human nature and capacities must come to terms with the fact that all normal humans acquire language, while even the most intelligent ape cannot acquire its rudiments. This was emphasized in Cartesian philosophy, leading to the rationalist view that language develops from within in a predetermined way when the appropriate environmental conditions exist.


The study of language is both fascinating and frustrating. Despite progress, we still struggle to understand the core problem of human language: the ability to understand and produce new expressions that are novel, independent of stimulus configurations, and understandable by others who share this mysterious ability.


Finally, it is a fact that there is no human language in which it is possible to specify the longest meaningful sentence, and the grammar of a language must allow for infinite use of finite means, as Hume and Darwin remarked.

July 15,2025
... Show More
Noam Chomsky's approach to linguistics is truly unique. What sets it apart is that it delves deep into the very first roots of language formations within its initial structure, something that all languages in the world have in common.

Language is seen as a genetically endowed biological system, much like what the biologist Richard Dawkins described in his book "The Selfish Gene" through the concept of the transmission of the cultural and linguistic aspect via what he termed "memes", which are analogous to "genes". This is considered in terms of phonemic, semantic, and grammatical foundations.

Noam, who perceived language as a mental faculty in the human brain that developed through biological processes originally influenced by human adaptations to the environment, his research remains the cornerstone for contemporary linguistic studies and research that seek to uncover the relationship between language in its cultural manifestation and the brain as a physical entity. His work has had a profound impact on the field of linguistics and continues to shape our understanding of language and its connection to the human mind and body.
July 15,2025
... Show More

Hæfilega tyrfið fyrir einhvern sem hefur enga fyrirframþekkingu á málvísindum. It can be quite a challenge for someone who has no prior knowledge of linguistics. However, I am up for finding an entrance to Chomsky.


Noam Chomsky is a renowned figure in the field of linguistics. His theories and ideas have had a significant impact on the way we understand language. To approach his work, one needs to have an open mind and a willingness to learn.


Perhaps starting with some of his basic concepts and gradually delving deeper into his more complex theories would be a good way to begin. Reading his books and papers, attending lectures and discussions, and engaging with other scholars in the field can all help in gaining a better understanding of Chomsky's work.


Although it may seem daunting at first, with perseverance and dedication, one can surely find their way into the fascinating world of Chomsky's linguistics.

July 15,2025
... Show More
The book truly does an astonishing job. It takes just a few needles and exerts its utmost effort in hauling around huge hay stacks. Moreover, as texts from approximately 50 years ago nearly fill the entire book, the needles are already somewhat rusty and a little dull.


Six of the essays, those so-called 'golden' oldies, are merely a collection of rather simple ideas (albeit perhaps not so self-evident in the linguistics of that era), inundated with a deluge of scarcely structured, uninformative, and philosophical meanderings. Many of the ideas put forth were good and have been beneficial for linguistics, while some were rubbish. (The notion that historical phonetic changes are somehow assumed by the speaker when choosing the phonological content of a morpheme for a specific task is a particularly preposterous one.)


The last essay, the more recent one, is fine and interesting, but disappointingly short. By far, it is not substantial enough to salvage the rest of the book.


I am awarding three stars because I recognize the impact of the ideas presented. However, the reading experience was far from pleasant. I have no idea why anyone would read this except for historical interest, especially considering there are better-written and more up-to-date books on the subject.
July 15,2025
... Show More
This work is extremely technical in nature.

It seems more like a compilation of various papers and lectures rather than a traditional, fully-fledged book.

One noticeable aspect is that at times, several paragraphs are rehashed verbatim between different chapters.

This repetition can make the reading experience a bit monotonous and may give the impression that the author didn't put in enough effort to present a more original and diverse content.

However, it should be noted that the technical details provided within the work are likely to be of great value to those with a specific interest in the subject matter.

Nevertheless, to truly enhance its quality and appeal, some improvements in terms of organization and avoiding unnecessary repetition could be made.

Overall, while it has its merits in terms of technical information, it falls short in certain aspects that could have made it a more engaging and impactful read.

July 15,2025
... Show More
This was an outstanding introduction to Chomsky and his theories.

It proved to be extremely interesting for individuals who have an interest in both linguistics and the fundamental concepts of neuropsychology.

The text presented a comprehensive overview, delving into the various aspects of Chomsky's work.

It explored his ideas on language acquisition, universal grammar, and the relationship between language and the mind.

For those unfamiliar with these concepts, it provided a clear and accessible explanation.

The connection between linguistics and neuropsychology was also well-explained, highlighting the importance of understanding the brain's role in language processing.

Overall, it was a great read that offered valuable insights into an important area of study.

Whether you are a student of linguistics, neuropsychology, or simply someone with a general interest in these fields, this article is definitely worth reading.
July 15,2025
... Show More
I didn't read the book.

However, I came across two interesting links. The first one is http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/langua.... The second link is http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1643.

It seems that Chomsky uses the innate humanity of the human brain as an argument against Darwin. He believes there is a metaphysical distinction between humans and animals. This view challenges the traditional understanding of evolution.

Maybe by reading the book and exploring these links further, we can gain a better understanding of this debate and the complex relationship between language, mind, and evolution.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.