At the centre of practically every major debate over America's role in the world, one finds Noam Chomsky's ideas - sometimes attacked, sometimes studiously ignored, but always a powerful presence.
Drawing from his published and unpublished work, The Chomsky Reader reveals the awesome range of this ever-critical mind - from global questions of war and peace to the most intricate questions of human intelligence, IQ and creativity. It reveals the underlying radical coherency of his view of the world - from his enormously influential attacks on America's role in Vietnam to his perspective on Nicaragua and Central America Today. Chomsky's challenge to accepted wisdom about Israel and the Palestinians has caused a furore in America, as have his trenchant essays on the real nature of terrorism in our age. No one has dissected more graphically the character of the cold war consensus and the way it benefits the two superpowers, and argued more thoughtfully for a shared elitist ethos in liberalism and communism. No one has exposed more logically America's acclaimed freedoms as masking irresponsible power and unjustified privilege, or argued quite so insistently that the "free press" is part of a stultifying conformity that pervades all aspects of American intellectual life.
Avram Noam Chomsky is an American professor and public intellectual known for his work in linguistics, political activism, and social criticism. Sometimes called "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He is a laureate professor of linguistics at the University of Arizona and an institute professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics. In addition to his work in linguistics, since the 1960s Chomsky has been an influential voice on the American left as a consistent critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, and corporate influence on political institutions and the media. Born to Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants in Philadelphia, Chomsky developed an early interest in anarchism from alternative bookstores in New York City. He studied at the University of Pennsylvania. During his postgraduate work in the Harvard Society of Fellows, Chomsky developed the theory of transformational grammar for which he earned his doctorate in 1955. That year he began teaching at MIT, and in 1957 emerged as a significant figure in linguistics with his landmark work Syntactic Structures, which played a major role in remodeling the study of language. From 1958 to 1959 Chomsky was a National Science Foundation fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. He created or co-created the universal grammar theory, the generative grammar theory, the Chomsky hierarchy, and the minimalist program. Chomsky also played a pivotal role in the decline of linguistic behaviorism, and was particularly critical of the work of B.F. Skinner. An outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which he saw as an act of American imperialism, in 1967 Chomsky rose to national attention for his anti-war essay "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Becoming associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism and placed on President Richard M. Nixon's list of political opponents. While expanding his work in linguistics over subsequent decades, he also became involved in the linguistics wars. In collaboration with Edward S. Herman, Chomsky later articulated the propaganda model of media criticism in Manufacturing Consent, and worked to expose the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. His defense of unconditional freedom of speech, including that of Holocaust denial, generated significant controversy in the Faurisson affair of the 1980s. Chomsky's commentary on the Cambodian genocide and the Bosnian genocide also generated controversy. Since retiring from active teaching at MIT, he has continued his vocal political activism, including opposing the 2003 invasion of Iraq and supporting the Occupy movement. An anti-Zionist, Chomsky considers Israel's treatment of Palestinians to be worse than South African–style apartheid, and criticizes U.S. support for Israel. Chomsky is widely recognized as having helped to spark the cognitive revolution in the human sciences, contributing to the development of a new cognitivistic framework for the study of language and the mind. Chomsky remains a leading critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, U.S. involvement and Israel's role in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and mass media. Chomsky and his ideas are highly influential in the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movements. Since 2017, he has been Agnese Helms Haury Chair in the Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizona.
A great introduction to various aspects of Chomsky's ideas. It delves into different areas, and I found the sections on the Cold War and American intervention to be most enlightening and engaging. The detailed analysis in these parts provides valuable insights into historical events and their implications. However, at times, the dated nature of the essays (most written in the 70s to mid-80s) can be a hindrance. Some of the references and examples might seem a bit outdated in today's context. But on the whole, the teeth of his arguments and criticisms still have not lost their relevance or bite. Chomsky's ability to point out the incongruities between stated US policy/propaganda and the realities of our actions is truly remarkable. It makes one wonder 'are we the baddies?' This thought-provoking question challenges us to reevaluate our understanding of the US's role in the world. I highly recommend this to anyone who seeks a critical approach to understanding the way the US behaves both domestically and abroad. It offers a unique perspective that can help us gain a deeper understanding of complex issues.
I've often noticed Chomsky's name popping up in various discussions. So, I decided it was high time to truly understand why everyone seems so eager to mention him. After delving into this book, I now have that understanding. This book is essentially like "The Emperor's New Clothes" for adults. It shatters your illusions regarding American Foreign Policy, academia, the press, and more. At times, it can get a bit repetitive. This is because Chomsky applies the same fundamental logic to most of the situations presented within the book. Nevertheless, once you've read it, your perception of the world is likely to change. And this holds true even if you, like me, disagree with some of Chomsky's conclusions. What truly intrigues me is the fact that the views Chomsky expresses - anti-capitalist, critical of American myth-making, lamenting the closed circle of powerful businesspeople who turn the press and government into mere puppets, and so on - are typically the sort of things one hears from enraged protesters. You know the type - standing atop a truck, brandishing a megaphone, protesting without a specific focus because they're too busy proclaiming that everything is dreadful and we need to wake up and oppose "the man," or something along those lines. Chomsky takes this rather extreme stance and strips away the hysteria. He calmly and cogently advocates for the public to strive towards imposing checks on the power of big business and the institutions controlled by the business elite. Personally, I found the chapter on the Middle East to be the most disappointing part. It seems as if Chomsky began engaging in the kind of mental acrobatics that he (rightfully) accuses other writers of throughout the rest of the book, and it felt a bit off to me. However, he still has a valid point to make. Note: While there is a section on linguistics in this book, it is really a compilation of Chomsky's works and talks on other subjects. If you are primarily interested in Chomsky as a linguist, it would be advisable to pick up another of his books.
A friend wrote in the first page of their diary, "Stay critical. Stay radical." However, I would replace the second "Stay radical" with "Stay balanced". Chomsky, on the other hand, manages to do all three. He is known for his critical analysis of various issues, including foreign policy. His arguments are often radical in nature, challenging the status quo and the dominant narratives.
I would love to see a good critique or response to his foreign policy arguments. Such a critique could help to further our understanding of the complex issues involved and also provide a platform for a more informed and meaningful discussion. It could also help to identify the strengths and weaknesses of Chomsky's arguments and perhaps even lead to some new insights or perspectives.
In conclusion, while Chomsky's ideas may be controversial, they are also thought-provoking and worthy of serious consideration. A good critique or response to his foreign policy arguments could contribute to a more robust and democratic debate on these important issues.
Noam Chomsky is a highly influential figure whose perspectives often aim to challenge and even undermine the traditional or establishment historical thinking. This collection presents a diverse range of materials. It includes a truly brilliant essay that delves deep into the realm of intellectualism, offering profound insights and thought-provoking ideas. Additionally, there is a very good interview that provides further context and understanding of Chomsky's views and his intellectual journey. The collection also features some neat contemporary pieces that explore topics such as cold war thinking and other relevant issues. However, at times, the focus seems to shift more towards minutiae rather than the macrocosm. As a result, the reader may find themselves getting bogged down in the detailed analyses. Nevertheless, within this complex and sometimes overwhelming collection, there are some real pearls to be discovered. These are the moments of pure genius and profound understanding that make wading through the dirt worthwhile. Despite the challenges, the collection offers a valuable and engaging exploration of Chomsky's ideas and their significance in the context of historical and contemporary thought.
The original article:
This is a short article. It needs to be rewritten and expanded.
The rewritten and expanded article:
This is a rather concise article. It is in need of being rewritten and expanded to provide more detailed and comprehensive information. Perhaps we can add more examples, explanations, or descriptions to make it more engaging and informative. By doing so, the readers will be able to have a better understanding of the topic at hand. Moreover, we can also improve the overall structure and flow of the article to make it more logical and coherent. This will enhance the readability and usability of the article, making it more valuable for the readers. elibrary
Chomsky can be extremely irritating to read. Despite his renowned reputation for clear and persuasive logic and argumentation, he frequently simply asserts things without presenting any arguments or evidence. He often utters statements like "this is so obvious I need not dwell on it here" or "I have provided ample evidence for this elsewhere". This is understandable. He has been expounding many of the same ideas for such a long time, and being so often ignored or misinterpreted, it is likely frustrating to be constantly requested to repeat himself. Perhaps many of these things were indeed obvious and self-evident to informed audiences in the 60s and 70s in a manner that they are not today. Just as today, one could demolish an entire argument by simply stating, for example, "but Mitch McConnell said that", whereas a reader 50 years from now might not even recall who that is. Nevertheless, all of this makes the material sometimes difficult to read and follow. Still, in the brief period since I began reading this, I have lost count of how many times the content here has emerged in my own life. I have already had numerous occasions where I was pondering something or discussing some issue with someone and found myself thinking or saying, "Chomsky has been making this point since the 60s". If one can decipher what they are, the observations he makes, the connections he draws, and the overall way of thinking about and explaining the world remain highly relevant and useful today.
Something I dip into when I'm feeling contrary is a good book. Whenever I find myself in a contrary mood, I turn to the world of literature. It's like a magical escape that allows me to explore different perspectives and emotions. I can lose myself in the pages of a thrilling mystery, be inspired by the words of a great philosopher, or be charmed by the characters in a heartwarming romance. Reading helps me to calm my mind and gain a new perspective on my own feelings. It shows me that there are always different ways to look at things and that my contrary mood is just a passing phase. So, the next time you're feeling contrary, I encourage you to pick up a book and take a dip into its wonderful world. You might be surprised at how much it can help.