Please provide the article that needs to be rewritten and expanded so that I can help you.

A great introduction to various aspects of Chomsky's ideas.

It delves into different areas, and I found the sections on the Cold War and American intervention to be most enlightening and engaging. The detailed analysis in these parts provides valuable insights into historical events and their implications.

However, at times, the dated nature of the essays (most written in the 70s to mid-80s) can be a hindrance. Some of the references and examples might seem a bit outdated in today's context.

But on the whole, the teeth of his arguments and criticisms still have not lost their relevance or bite. Chomsky's ability to point out the incongruities between stated US policy/propaganda and the realities of our actions is truly remarkable.

It makes one wonder 'are we the baddies?' This thought-provoking question challenges us to reevaluate our understanding of the US's role in the world.

I highly recommend this to anyone who seeks a critical approach to understanding the way the US behaves both domestically and abroad. It offers a unique perspective that can help us gain a deeper understanding of complex issues.

I've often noticed Chomsky's name popping up in various discussions. So, I decided it was high time to truly understand why everyone seems so eager to mention him. After delving into this book, I now have that understanding.

This book is essentially like "The Emperor's New Clothes" for adults. It shatters your illusions regarding American Foreign Policy, academia, the press, and more. At times, it can get a bit repetitive. This is because Chomsky applies the same fundamental logic to most of the situations presented within the book. Nevertheless, once you've read it, your perception of the world is likely to change. And this holds true even if you, like me, disagree with some of Chomsky's conclusions.

What truly intrigues me is the fact that the views Chomsky expresses - anti-capitalist, critical of American myth-making, lamenting the closed circle of powerful businesspeople who turn the press and government into mere puppets, and so on - are typically the sort of things one hears from enraged protesters. You know the type - standing atop a truck, brandishing a megaphone, protesting without a specific focus because they're too busy proclaiming that everything is dreadful and we need to wake up and oppose "the man," or something along those lines. Chomsky takes this rather extreme stance and strips away the hysteria. He calmly and cogently advocates for the public to strive towards imposing checks on the power of big business and the institutions controlled by the business elite.

Personally, I found the chapter on the Middle East to be the most disappointing part. It seems as if Chomsky began engaging in the kind of mental acrobatics that he (rightfully) accuses other writers of throughout the rest of the book, and it felt a bit off to me. However, he still has a valid point to make.

Note: While there is a section on linguistics in this book, it is really a compilation of Chomsky's works and talks on other subjects. If you are primarily interested in Chomsky as a linguist, it would be advisable to pick up another of his books.

A friend wrote in the first page of their diary, "Stay critical. Stay radical." However, I would replace the second "Stay radical" with "Stay balanced". Chomsky, on the other hand, manages to do all three. He is known for his critical analysis of various issues, including foreign policy. His arguments are often radical in nature, challenging the status quo and the dominant narratives.

I would love to see a good critique or response to his foreign policy arguments. Such a critique could help to further our understanding of the complex issues involved and also provide a platform for a more informed and meaningful discussion. It could also help to identify the strengths and weaknesses of Chomsky's arguments and perhaps even lead to some new insights or perspectives.

In conclusion, while Chomsky's ideas may be controversial, they are also thought-provoking and worthy of serious consideration. A good critique or response to his foreign policy arguments could contribute to a more robust and democratic debate on these important issues.

Noam Chomsky is a highly influential figure whose perspectives often aim to challenge and even undermine the traditional or establishment historical thinking.

This collection presents a diverse range of materials. It includes a truly brilliant essay that delves deep into the realm of intellectualism, offering profound insights and thought-provoking ideas. Additionally, there is a very good interview that provides further context and understanding of Chomsky's views and his intellectual journey.

The collection also features some neat contemporary pieces that explore topics such as cold war thinking and other relevant issues. However, at times, the focus seems to shift more towards minutiae rather than the macrocosm. As a result, the reader may find themselves getting bogged down in the detailed analyses.

Nevertheless, within this complex and sometimes overwhelming collection, there are some real pearls to be discovered. These are the moments of pure genius and profound understanding that make wading through the dirt worthwhile. Despite the challenges, the collection offers a valuable and engaging exploration of Chomsky's ideas and their significance in the context of historical and contemporary thought.

The original article:
This is a short article. It needs to be rewritten and expanded.

The rewritten and expanded article:

This is a rather concise article.

It is in need of being rewritten and expanded to provide more detailed and comprehensive information.

Perhaps we can add more examples, explanations, or descriptions to make it more engaging and informative.

By doing so, the readers will be able to have a better understanding of the topic at hand.

Moreover, we can also improve the overall structure and flow of the article to make it more logical and coherent.

This will enhance the readability and usability of the article, making it more valuable for the readers.

elibrary

Chomsky can be extremely irritating to read. Despite his renowned reputation for clear and persuasive logic and argumentation, he frequently simply asserts things without presenting any arguments or evidence. He often utters statements like "this is so obvious I need not dwell on it here" or "I have provided ample evidence for this elsewhere".

This is understandable. He has been expounding many of the same ideas for such a long time, and being so often ignored or misinterpreted, it is likely frustrating to be constantly requested to repeat himself. Perhaps many of these things were indeed obvious and self-evident to informed audiences in the 60s and 70s in a manner that they are not today. Just as today, one could demolish an entire argument by simply stating, for example, "but Mitch McConnell said that", whereas a reader 50 years from now might not even recall who that is. Nevertheless, all of this makes the material sometimes difficult to read and follow.

Still, in the brief period since I began reading this, I have lost count of how many times the content here has emerged in my own life. I have already had numerous occasions where I was pondering something or discussing some issue with someone and found myself thinking or saying, "Chomsky has been making this point since the 60s". If one can decipher what they are, the observations he makes, the connections he draws, and the overall way of thinking about and explaining the world remain highly relevant and useful today.

Something I dip into when I'm feeling contrary is a good book.

Whenever I find myself in a contrary mood, I turn to the world of literature. It's like a magical escape that allows me to explore different perspectives and emotions.

I can lose myself in the pages of a thrilling mystery, be inspired by the words of a great philosopher, or be charmed by the characters in a heartwarming romance.

Reading helps me to calm my mind and gain a new perspective on my own feelings. It shows me that there are always different ways to look at things and that my contrary mood is just a passing phase.

So, the next time you're feeling contrary, I encourage you to pick up a book and take a dip into its wonderful world. You might be surprised at how much it can help.

I am truly enjoying this remarkable book.

It delves deeply into Noam Chomsky's ideals, exploring the various concepts and theories that have shaped his influential work.

Not only does it cover his intellectual pursuits but also provides valuable insights into his background.

By understanding the events and experiences that led to his development as a thinker, we can gain a more comprehensive appreciation of his ideas.

The book presents a detailed and engaging account of Chomsky's life and work, making it a fascinating read for anyone interested in linguistics, philosophy, or social theory.

It offers a unique opportunity to explore the mind of one of the most important and controversial figures of our time.

Overall, I highly recommend this book to anyone looking to expand their knowledge and understanding of Chomsky and his contributions to the field.

This is one of those essays that I keep returning to time and time again.

"The Responsibility of the Intellectuals" is just as important now as when it was originally written.

In today's complex and rapidly changing world, intellectuals play a crucial role. Their ideas and perspectives can shape public opinion, influence policy decisions, and drive social change.

However, with this power comes great responsibility. Intellectuals must use their knowledge and expertise to promote truth, justice, and the common good.

They must be willing to speak out against injustice and oppression, and to offer solutions to the pressing problems of our time.

Moreover, intellectuals must be open to different viewpoints and willing to engage in respectful dialogue with those who hold opposing views.

Only by doing so can they hope to arrive at a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the issues at hand.

In conclusion, "The Responsibility of the Intellectuals" remains a timely and relevant piece that reminds us of the important role that intellectuals play in society and the responsibilities that come with that role.

This is a truly remarkable piece that offers a great intellectual read for anyone with an interest in foreign global policy and/or the media and its mind control.

It delves deep into the complex world of international relations, exploring the various factors and forces at play. The author presents a thought-provoking analysis of how global policies are formulated and implemented, and the role that the media plays in shaping public perception.

Through detailed research and incisive commentary, the article uncovers the hidden mechanisms of mind control that the media may employ. It challenges readers to think critically about the information they consume and to question the motives behind it.

Whether you are a student of international relations, a journalist, or simply someone who is curious about the world around you, this article is sure to provide valuable insights and stimulate your intellectual curiosity.

I'm finding it extremely difficult to engage with any contemporary, non-fiction works. The potential subject matter seems so rich and fertile, yet most of what I've perused can only be characterized as mere variations of ranting, regardless of the socio-political stance. Do I sound cynical? Perhaps. But it's the truth as I see it.

Consequently, I've once again embarked on the remarkable (albeit somewhat disturbing) journey of "The Chomsky Reader." I am at a loss to adequately convey just how invigorating (and yes, still a bit disturbing) it is to read works that are so meticulously thought out and eloquently articulated. For the time being, I'm distancing myself from the Krugmans, Suskinds, and other contemporaries, choosing instead to immerse myself in the truly meaningful.

As has always been the case, when I'm in need of some fictional escape, I'll simply log on to the NYT or the WaPo. Fortunately, I don't often have a penchant for fiction. It's not that I don't appreciate it; it's just that my interests lie more in the realm of the real and the thought-provoking.