11 de septiembre

... Show More
En 11 de septiembre Noam Chomsky disecciona las causas de raíz de la catástrofe del 11 de septiembre, sus precedentes históricos, y las posibles consecuencias mientras el mundo se mueve hacia la realidad de después del 11 de septiembre.

144 pages, Paperback

First published November 1,2001

About the author

... Show More
Avram Noam Chomsky is an American professor and public intellectual known for his work in linguistics, political activism, and social criticism. Sometimes called "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He is a laureate professor of linguistics at the University of Arizona and an institute professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics. In addition to his work in linguistics, since the 1960s Chomsky has been an influential voice on the American left as a consistent critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, and corporate influence on political institutions and the media.
Born to Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants in Philadelphia, Chomsky developed an early interest in anarchism from alternative bookstores in New York City. He studied at the University of Pennsylvania. During his postgraduate work in the Harvard Society of Fellows, Chomsky developed the theory of transformational grammar for which he earned his doctorate in 1955. That year he began teaching at MIT, and in 1957 emerged as a significant figure in linguistics with his landmark work Syntactic Structures, which played a major role in remodeling the study of language. From 1958 to 1959 Chomsky was a National Science Foundation fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. He created or co-created the universal grammar theory, the generative grammar theory, the Chomsky hierarchy, and the minimalist program. Chomsky also played a pivotal role in the decline of linguistic behaviorism, and was particularly critical of the work of B.F. Skinner.
An outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which he saw as an act of American imperialism, in 1967 Chomsky rose to national attention for his anti-war essay "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Becoming associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism and placed on President Richard M. Nixon's list of political opponents. While expanding his work in linguistics over subsequent decades, he also became involved in the linguistics wars. In collaboration with Edward S. Herman, Chomsky later articulated the propaganda model of media criticism in Manufacturing Consent, and worked to expose the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. His defense of unconditional freedom of speech, including that of Holocaust denial, generated significant controversy in the Faurisson affair of the 1980s. Chomsky's commentary on the Cambodian genocide and the Bosnian genocide also generated controversy. Since retiring from active teaching at MIT, he has continued his vocal political activism, including opposing the 2003 invasion of Iraq and supporting the Occupy movement. An anti-Zionist, Chomsky considers Israel's treatment of Palestinians to be worse than South African–style apartheid, and criticizes U.S. support for Israel.
Chomsky is widely recognized as having helped to spark the cognitive revolution in the human sciences, contributing to the development of a new cognitivistic framework for the study of language and the mind. Chomsky remains a leading critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, U.S. involvement and Israel's role in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and mass media. Chomsky and his ideas are highly influential in the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movements. Since 2017, he has been Agnese Helms Haury Chair in the Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizona.

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
33(33%)
4 stars
30(30%)
3 stars
37(37%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews All reviews
July 15,2025
... Show More
I rate it 9/11.

This score indicates that I have a relatively high evaluation of something. It might be a movie, a book, a product, or an experience.

The number 9 out of 11 shows that there are aspects that I really like and appreciate. It could be the quality, the performance, the design, or the overall impact.

However, the score also implies that there are still some areas that could be improved or enhanced. Maybe there are some minor flaws or不足之处 that prevent it from getting a perfect score.

Overall, a 9/11 rating means that it is a very good thing, but there is still room for growth and development. It makes me look forward to seeing further improvements and refinements in the future.
July 15,2025
... Show More
I found this a truly stimulating read. It has managed to uncover a wealth of information that I was completely unaware of before.

It is truly impressive to see just how effective the western propaganda machines can be. They seem to have a knack for glossing over and spinning stories in such a way that they make themselves out to be the victims of terrorism. However, the reality is quite the opposite. In fact, they have been some of the worst offenders when it comes to some of the most heinous atrocities committed over the past sixty years or so.

There is always more to a story than meets the eye. We need to look beyond the surface and dig deeper to uncover the truth. This article has served as a reminder that we cannot always trust what we are told by the mainstream media. We must be vigilant and question everything in order to form our own informed opinions.
July 15,2025
... Show More
For a book that is admittedly kind of a rush job, consisting of a series of interviews done within a few weeks of the attacks, when we were still uncertain whether Bin Laden was responsible, it has held up rather well.

If you are familiar with Chomsky’s critiques of American foreign policy, there won't be much new here. This book is, instead, an attempt to popularize his basic views, contextualizing the 9/11 terrorist attack within the history of America’s own violent attacks on other nations.

Ironically, despite the serious tone and subject of this book, I often thought of a comical exchange between Chomsky and Sam Harris. Harris presents himself as a paragon of reason and tried to have a sober “exchange” of views with Chomsky, which quickly turned acrimonious as Chomsky wasn't in a friendly mood. However, this exchange does effectively pinpoint the ethical position that Chomsky is taking and that many people fail to understand.

The disagreement between them centers around the 1998 U.S. bombing of the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. Chomsky uses this as an example of American state terrorism and asks the reader what the response would be if the situation was reversed. Harris’s defense, which I believe is the standard argument in favor of U.S. intervention, is that our intentions were pure. We were just trying to stop terrorists from producing weapons.

Harris presents Chomsky with several thought experiments, making the point that intentions matter when making ethical judgments. But he overlooks the obvious point that there is a grey area between altruistic and hostile intentions, which, ethically speaking, is often hardly better than being actively hostile.

This describes the mentality behind the U.S. bombing of Al-Shifa. If we thought weapons were being produced in Brussels, we wouldn't have sent cruise missiles to blow up the building because the “collateral damage” would be unacceptable. But in the case of Sudan, a much poorer country, the decision was made quickly in favor of attack, showing an ethical stance of disregard.

A great deal of Chomsky’s critique of American foreign policy is an attempt to get us to consider all lives as equally valuable and all nations as equally sovereign, to stop applying a double standard. We are still far from this stance. If the 9/11 attack had originated in Ireland, what are the chances we would have invaded the entire country? As Chomsky points out, the U.K. didn't invade and bomb Boston even though many of its citizens funded the IRA.

We can see this uncaring attitude of American foreign policy in the August 29 bombing that killed 10 in Kabul this year, six of them children. Harris excuses “mistakes” like this by pointing to limitations in our intelligence and weapons technology. But being ethical means acting within the limitations of a situation and considering the possible negative consequences. No drone strike would have taken place in Brussels, but the possibility of killing innocent Afghanis is given little weight.

It is clear that we are dealing with a serious moral blindness that leads us to commit blunders and crimes. We seem to think everyone else will see past the accidental death and destruction and give us credit for our pure intentions. But what speaks louder: our beautiful words or the thousands of dead in our wake?
July 15,2025
... Show More
So ahh... it's an awkward read on the bus, let me tell you.

Regardless, it's an interesting look at the attack that changed the world in more ways than people admit.

Chomsky was pretty much bang on with his predictions and provides endless historical references and parallels to explain why he feared for what would happen.

The book doesn't get 5 stars because it is a bit repetitive, such is the nature of the book. It is a collection of interviews, after all.

However, it is still a good read for the Pol heads out there. It offers valuable insights into a significant event and the thoughts of a renowned intellectual.

The repetitive nature, while a drawback, also serves to emphasize certain points.

Overall, it's a worthwhile book that can expand one's understanding of the complex issues surrounding the attack and its aftermath.
July 15,2025
... Show More
Noam Chomsky is a renowned intellectual, and this latest work is yet another great read from him.

His analysis of the reaction by the US government and other world governments to the 9/11 attacks is extremely accurate and incisive.

If you have struggled to get through some of Chomsky's other more complex and dense books, then this one is a great choice for you.

Primarily, it is a reprint of a series of interviews, which makes it extremely accessible and easy to understand.

Chomsky's insights and perspectives on this important topic are sure to stimulate thought and discussion, and this book is a must-read for anyone interested in politics, international relations, and the events surrounding 9/11.

Whether you are a long-time fan of Chomsky or new to his work, this book is well worth your time and attention.
July 15,2025
... Show More

I'm truly impressed that Chomsky, right after 9/11, was able to recognize the numerous counter-currents in society. These counter-currents advocated for a more nuanced way to deal with the Taliban in order to combat Al-Qaeda. What's even more significant is that he immediately distinguished between the peaceful essence of the vast majority of Islam and the nature of the terrorists who carried out the attacks on us in its name.


I once had the great privilege of listening to Alan Story talk about non-violence. Alan, a South African minister, was conscripted into the South African army to assist in enforcing apartheid. Alan attempted to become a conscientious objector and was arrested by his government for this. One thing he said about foreign policy really struck me. He said, "When the only tool in your toolbox is a hammer, all your problems start looking like nails." He was referring to the Department of Defense's handling of post-9/11 foreign policy issues in Iraq. Our efforts to find less devastating means to resolve that conflict were shockingly weak. To win the battle against radicalism and religious extremism, we require more than just a hammer in our toolbox.

July 15,2025
... Show More
These interviews, when taken as a whole, give the distinct impression of being an apology for the terrorism perpetrated by non-US entities.

Chomsky appears to always manage to identify a prior cause for the assaults targeted at America. He seems to show very little concern for the intentions behind such acts and instead focuses on a consequentialist perspective of the American-Middle East conflicts.

While it is true that the Americans might have made mistakes in their foreign undertakings, the author's strange ability, or rather inclination, to find an explanation or even an excuse for anti-Western sentiment seems disrespectful and misdirected.

Moreover, his dismissal of any religious or anti-modern motives for terrorist acts seems deliberately insincere, thus suggesting a less than completely impartial view on the international affairs of the US.

It is important to approach such complex issues with a more comprehensive and objective analysis, taking into account all the relevant factors and not simply trying to justify or downplay certain actions.
July 15,2025
... Show More
I really love Noaam.

He has such a unique and plain way of talking about politics that it actually makes me want to read more and more.

For example, the book "9/11" is something I can highly recommend to any female or male who doesn't have much background knowledge about politics.

Through reading it, I was able to understand how grand the U.S. is.

And as a post-modernist, I also felt the easiness of the myth about democracy.

However, it seems that there is no easy solution to the complex political issues.

Overall, Noaam's works have really opened my eyes and made me think more deeply about politics and society.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.