The history of the book is a bit old. It seems to have been written around 2003-2004. However, it still explains America's attitude towards world politics very well with good examples. Especially its attitude in the Middle East policy and the Israel-Palestine conflict is enlightening. There are also criticisms towards Turkey in the book.

This book, although not the most recent publication, offers valuable insights into America's stance on various global issues. It provides a historical perspective that can help readers better understand the roots and development of these attitudes. The examples given in the book make the analysis more vivid and easier to understand.

In addition, the presence of criticisms towards Turkey in the book adds another dimension to the discussion. It allows for a more comprehensive examination of the relationship between the United States and Turkey, as well as the different positions and interests of both countries. Overall, this book can be a useful resource for those interested in international relations and American foreign policy.

As is the case with much of Chomsky’s writing on foreign policy, this book is not difficult to comprehend in the slightest.

Unlike some postmodern leftist critiques of neo-colonialism and American hegemony, the ideas here are not swathed in complicated philosophical frameworks and obscure language. This is not because Chomsky is incapable of engaging in this type of discourse. After all, his more philosophical work is among the most heavily cited in academic circles.

Rather, it is because the role the United States has played in world affairs over the past 100 years just isn’t that complicated. As tends to be the case with global hegemons, including the British Empire which preceded it, the United States maintains its status by wreaking havoc upon those who resist its domination.

In the state capitalist-imperialist mode of production characteristic of the 20th/21st century, this has taken the form of war upon nations that attempt independent economic development free from the economic influence of the United States and its fascist collaborators.

It is only the ideology of the ruling class, which at the time of publication involved Bush-era nonsense about “spreading democracy,” that gives US hegemony a benign appearance. Chomsky’s objective, therefore, is to obliterate that ideology with relentless empiricism.

By simply comparing the lies of ruling class ideology with the actual historical record, he effortlessly exposes the barbarity of US foreign policy as well as the complicity of the subservient US media in our crimes.

The central difference between the US and its hegemonic predecessors is not, as the ruling class would like us to believe, that the US is a beacon of freedom and democracy lighting the way for the rest of the world.

Rather, the difference is that unlike our predecessors, we now possess the capability to destroy life on earth. The intertwining of state power and industry so characteristic of our rule has resulted in both ecological catastrophe and the proliferation of nuclear weapons across the globe.

Both of these bring the potential to destroy us. The former persists thanks to corporate greed and the orientation of our economic system toward short-term profit, a reality also reflected in our government’s inability to pass any meaningful climate legislation that would impede the profit-making machine.

The latter, which nearly ended humanity 60 years ago, still persists thanks to the United States continuously and unilaterally (Israel is pretty much just our bitch at this point) blocking efforts at disarmament.

As Americans, opposition to US hegemony is not just a matter of anti-imperialism, it is a matter of life and death.

As usual, Chomsky brings the heat. I read this one in Spanish, so my understanding might not be perfect. However, I found it both insightful and frightening. It seems that we are headed down a dangerous road. The ideas presented by Chomsky are thought-provoking and make one question the current state of affairs. His analysis of various issues is often critical and challenges the status quo. It is important to take his words seriously and consider the implications. We need to be aware of the potential consequences of our actions and make informed decisions. Only then can we hope to avoid the dangerous path that lies ahead.

An eye-opening read indeed. America has managed to achieve world dominance by establishing repressive regimes, and the list is extensive. El Salvador, Iraq, Nicaragua, Haiti, Indonesia, The Philippines, and Equatorial Guinea are just a few examples. The motive of keeping the rich even wealthier has been accomplished with great success. So, the lesson here is that democracy is acceptable as long as it serves the interests of the rich and not the general population, and as long as one obeys the US.

The excuses of humanitarian or war on terror motives are simply laughable. The phrase "America knows best" is prevalent throughout the book. Examples and references of American crimes are listed, and they are truly breathtaking. The planning is brilliant, and the divide and conquer strategy has been effective since World War II. The UN is often ignored, and all popular or sensible proposals, such as the prohibition of the militarization of space or mediation before the Iraq war, are vetoed.

Chomsky's language can sometimes be sarcastic and emotive, but given the subject matter, it is understandable. I wouldn't be surprised if the UK's decision to leave Europe was the result of US manipulation. This has weakened Europe, isolated the UK, and will have a negative impact on it for generations to come.

Noam Chomsky is a renowned linguist and political activist. His works have often been highly critical of the United States government and its policies. It could be said that in a sense, he "punched Uncle Sam in the face on every page."

Chomsky's writings are filled with incisive analysis and scathing critiques. He has questioned the actions and motives of the US government in various arenas, such as foreign policy, military interventions, and domestic social issues.

His views have sparked intense debates and discussions, challenging the status quo and making people think deeply about the power and actions of the government.

While some may agree with his perspectives and see him as a voice of reason and justice, others may oppose his views and consider him too radical. Nevertheless, there is no denying the significant impact that Chomsky has had on the intellectual and political landscape.

His work continues to be studied and analyzed, and his ideas continue to shape the way people think about the role of government and society.

A critical examination of American foreign policy decisions reveals a complex web of issues. From our imperialist past to the present-day foreign interventionist policies, there has been a significant impact on the international perception of the US. These policies have given rise to an animosity towards the US globally and have led to the overarching belief that our government makes decisions with the aim of economically dominating other nations and subjugating them to our will, by any means necessary.

It is a harsh reality that our country appears to be under the influence of a select few with moneyed interests in the financial industry and the military-industrial complex. The vast majority of the people are often oblivious to the true meaning of "in our nation's interests" and the consequences that await those who do not conform. They may unknowingly bear the brunt of the actions taken in the name of US interests.

Domination seems to be the driving force behind many of these decisions, regardless of the potential long-term repercussions for future generations. This approach not only undermines international relations but also raises questions about the ethical and moral basis of our foreign policy. It is essential that we take a closer look at these issues and strive for a more balanced and just approach to foreign policy that respects the sovereignty and rights of other nations.

A very clear analysis on how the foreign policy of the United States has intervened in regions such as the Middle East and Latin America with the firm purpose of obtaining energy resources, strategic advantages, or some kind of benefit. It analyzes very well how the US has undermined democracies and supported dictatorships or fascist regimes, especially in Latin America. The US is the main terrorist state in the world.

The United States' actions in these regions have had far-reaching consequences. In the Middle East, its military interventions and support for certain governments have led to instability, conflict, and the displacement of millions of people. In Latin America, its interference has often been aimed at protecting its economic interests, even if it means backing authoritarian leaders. This has not only violated the rights and freedoms of the people in these regions but has also damaged the international order and undermined global peace and security.

It is essential that the international community recognizes the true nature of the US foreign policy and takes measures to hold the US accountable for its actions. This includes promoting dialogue and cooperation to resolve conflicts peacefully, strengthening international law and institutions, and supporting the development of democratic and just societies in all regions of the world.

Chomsky, use your words.

To be fair, I wasn't actually able to finish it (yet) but do intend to as it is a thesis demanding attention. However, I did get far enough to shake my judgmental fist.

How can entire paragraphs, let alone pages, of text be comprised entirely of a string of isolated quotes by other sources with no context? It was like a compilation essay by an inexperienced schmuck of an undergrad lacking any semblance of an original thought in his head or influence. This is not what one would expect from a renowned author, orator, and expert in the field.

It seems that the author has simply strung together quotes without adding any meaningful analysis or interpretation. This makes the text feel disjointed and缺乏连贯性.

To be continued....

Mucho ejemplo real, pero mezclando la necesidad con la opción.

Género. Ensayo.

Lo que nos cuenta. The book "Hegemony or Survival" (original publication: Hegemony or Survival. America's Quest for Global Dominance, 2003), with the subtitle "The Global Domination of the United States", is a review of the imperialist strategy of the United States of America. Through aggressive political and military actions, it first sought global primacy and now perhaps aims to slow down the decline of its power, which was indisputable years ago.

This book delves deep into the complex web of American foreign policies and their far-reaching consequences. It explores how the pursuit of hegemony has shaped the nation's actions on the international stage.

¿Quiere saber más de este libro, sin spoilers? Visite:

http://librosdeolethros.blogspot.com/...

If you are interested in understanding the dynamics of power and the role of the United States in the world, this book is a must-read. It offers valuable insights and perspectives that can help you form a more informed opinion.

More like a 3.8 but will round up cause I like and respect Chomsky.

This is an interesting book penned by a brilliant mind. However, it has a shortcoming, and the reason is the same as that of much of Chomsky's political writing: a lack of context.

Chomsky once again criticizes America for its past misdeeds and present flaws, of which there are numerous to emphasize. But he fails to mention the positive aspects of the country, which also abound.

His views have not changed in recent years. According to Chomsky in 2020, “Fifteen years ago, I wrote a book called Failed States... referring to states that are incapable of meeting the needs of citizens, in the most important case because of deep policy choices, and are a danger not only to their own citizens but the world. The prime example was the United States... I still stand by that judgment.”

A failed state? Really?

To be sure, there is plenty of room for improvement. But the idea that America is a failed state, which is Chomsky's central thesis, is far too extreme.

Indeed, this approach has little practical value, at least if the desire for accuracy exists. Focusing only on America's sins or judging it only against utopias that never existed is extremely misleading. The analysis must be placed in context by assessing America's strengths and weaknesses, not just the latter.

William Cooper, author of How America Works... And Why It Doesn't

This is a comprehensive and detailed refutation of the idea that upholding American hegemony is beneficial to security or morally just. It also, to a certain degree, challenges the democratic peace theory, which posits that democratic countries are less likely to engage in wars with each other, thereby supposedly contributing to greater world peace.

The book serves as a scathing condemnation of American foreign policy. It presents a disturbing picture that is both terrifying, as it discusses American "terrorist actions," and yet, paradoxically, also rather dull.

Despite its somewhat unappealing nature, I believe it is crucial to read this work. However, I wish you good luck in doing so, as it may not be an easy or enjoyable read.

Nonetheless, understanding the arguments presented within can provide valuable insights into the complex and often controversial world of international relations and American foreign policy.

An incredibly interesting initial argument is presented in this book. However, it gets pounded and dissected repeatedly using the same old historical case studies. As a result, I could hardly finish reading it. Chomsky's logic is indeed sound, and the historical evidence supports him. But this work would have been much better if it were presented as a conference paper or just one chapter. Instead, it offers a rambling, jumpy, and sometimes amateurish analysis.

Chomsky also seems to have a serious problem with organization. Sections that are supposed to describe a particular instance of America's neoimperialism in a certain part of the world keep jumping back and forth to other historical moments that may make the same argument. The repetition of the same conclusion (USA = hegemon) becomes tiresome and clearly requires some refinement.

Frankly, the whole book comes across as radical and alienating. Maybe it's a case of a genius gone wrong? Overall, I give it 2 stars.