I recently came across a very interesting book. The story within its pages took me on a thrilling journey. The characters were well-developed, each with their own unique personalities and motives. The plot was engaging and full of twists and turns that kept me on the edge of my seat from start to finish.
The author's writing style was also quite captivating. The descriptions were vivid, allowing me to easily picture the scenes and settings in my mind. It was as if I was actually a part of the story.
Overall, I would highly recommend this book to anyone looking for an exciting read. It's a book that will stay with you long after you've turned the last page. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Chi è pazzo? E chi può dirlo? This is a profound question that makes us stop and think. Madness is a complex concept that can be difficult to define. Is it someone who behaves irrationally, has delusions, or acts in a way that is considered abnormal by society? But who gets to decide what is normal and what is not?
Our perception of madness is often influenced by our cultural, social, and personal biases. What may seem crazy to one person might be perfectly understandable to another. Moreover, mental illness is not always easy to diagnose, and there are many different types and degrees of it.
We should be careful not to label people as crazy too quickly. Instead, we should try to understand their behavior and experiences, and offer them support and help if needed. After all, everyone has their own struggles and challenges, and we never know what might be going on in someone else's mind.
I am reading a Pirandello play for the first time, and I have lost count of how many times I have read Stoppard. However, I can understand the fascination that the latter has for the former. The way Stoppard blends mental states on stage, with his sly commentary that points out the stagecraft and just enough insight to see beyond the illusion held for the audience, is truly remarkable. It is almost like a soap opera, but dressed in medieval trappings.
Admittedly, I was in the same position as the newcomer Bertold, having studied the wrong Henry IV. But during the play, I got enough of a history lesson to know that it didn't really matter. The twist in the story revealed the lengths that some people will go to in order to avoid confronting their true selves. As the Archbishop from that other Henry proclaims: "With grant of our most just and right desires, And true obedience, of this madness cured, Stoop tamely to the foot of majesty." (2H4, IV.ii) But then, just before chaos erupts again, we are reminded of the fragile nature of our illusions and the difficulty of facing the truth.
Escaping from the past and its failures, isolating oneself, feigning madness as a way to flee from a painful reality of a friend's betrayal and a beloved's deceit. And after more than twenty years, the past comes back on its feet to face you, and your ghosts and fears emerge... The vengeance is realized, and continuing the madness becomes a means and a way to escape the punishment for the crime...
The hero lived, pretending to be the personality of King Henry IV. His friends and close ones insisted on treating his madness with shocks to revive and restore his memory... Only to discover that all these years he had been playing the role of the madman for them, and he reveals to them that more than twenty years ago, when they were on the Cranefield journey, he was wearing the clothes of King Henry, beside him was the woman he loved, and behind them was his friend and rival for her love, and they were riding horses... Because of the friend's envy of the hero's horse, which made the horse throw him and he lost consciousness. His fall was not an accidental incident but a plot to get rid of him... And in the end of the play, the hero kills his friend because of the daughter of their beloved...