The original article is not provided, so I can't rewrite and expand it specifically. However, I can give you a general example to show you how it might be done.

Let's assume the original article is: "The importance of exercise cannot be ignored. It helps keep our bodies healthy and strong."

Here is the rewritten and expanded version:

The significance of exercise truly cannot be overlooked. It plays a vital role in maintaining the well-being of our bodies. Regular exercise helps to strengthen our muscles, improve our cardiovascular system, and boost our overall energy levels. It also helps to reduce the risk of various diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. Moreover, exercise can have a positive impact on our mental health, reducing stress and anxiety and improving our mood. In conclusion, it is essential that we make exercise a regular part of our lives in order to enjoy a healthy and fulfilling life.

Please provide the original article so that I can rewrite and expand it according to your specific requirements.

As a philosopher, Wittgenstein isn't terribly systematic - which is rather shocking for an "analytic" thinker.

I would contend that he is an original, incorporating analytic (through thought experiments), continental (employing literary examples), pragmatic (using everyday life as a litmus test), and Nietzschean (with an aphoristic style and an attitude problem) elements.

In fact, I'm almost reluctant to call it philosophy at all. It's more like a magnificent, dense, and glittering puzzle box.

I'm certain that when I revisit it in the future, I'll extract something completely different from it - Wittgenstein appears to be less focused on presenting a systematic argument than on stimulating the reader's mind.

His work seems to be a complex tapestry of ideas that invites the reader to explore and engage, rather than simply accept a set of predefined concepts.

This unique approach makes his philosophy both challenging and rewarding, as it forces the reader to think deeply and question their own assumptions.

Wittgenstein's work is truly a masterpiece that continues to inspire and influence philosophers and thinkers today.

I read this due to Wittgenstein's significance in 20th century analytic philosophy, not out of enjoyment. The book is a difficult read. It consists of a series of notes that loosely follow larger sections of ideas. This isn't a bad style, and if executed properly, it can have a profound philosophical impact. Nietzsche was the undisputed master of this style, and Blaise Pascal could also do it well. Wittgenstein, however, doesn't quite achieve it.

But his ideas are important. I haven't read Tractatus Logicus Philosophicus, but I gather that he is rejecting that work. In this one, he is analyzing Augustine's statement that words describe objects. While that's true, words do much more.

Words act. The meaning of a word often lies in how it is used, as seen in the example of "5 red apples". Language games show that speaking language is part of an activity or form of life. The definition of a word is evident in its use. "Language is a medium of action."

Language games are all public and have rules established through repeated trials. They operate on tacit presuppositions.

Is this speech-act theory? It points in that direction, and I think this is Wittgenstein's greatest contribution.

There is an excursus on Being and Non-Being. The problem is that if everything we call being and non-being consists in the connections between elements, it doesn't make sense to speak of an element's being. Existence cannot be attributed to an element because if it didn't exist, one couldn't name it.

Can there be a Platonic form of a negative number? Do negatives have being? What about placing a negative sign in front of the infinity symbol? What is the Platonic universal for that?

-∞

In conclusion, it wasn't conceptually difficult to read, but it was hard to "get to the next page". For those of us who started with John Frame and Vern Poythress, a lot of Wittgenstein will be familiar. There were many valuable and perceptive insights, such as Moore's Paradox. However, I'm not sure if I would make this the mainstay of my philosophy studies.

LOUCO E SONHADOR

This phrase, "LOUCO E SONHADOR," which means "crazy and dreamer" in Portuguese, holds a certain charm and mystery. It represents those individuals who dare to think outside the box, to pursue their wildest dreams without fear of judgment or failure.

The crazy part implies a disregard for the norms and conventions that often hold people back. These are the ones who are not afraid to take risks, to make bold moves, and to step into the unknown. They have a passion that burns bright within them, driving them forward even in the face of adversity.

The dreamer aspect, on the other hand, speaks of their ability to envision a better future, to have big goals and aspirations. They are not content with the status quo but strive to create something new and extraordinary. Their dreams give them hope and motivation, fueling their journey towards success.

In a world that often values conformity and practicality, the LOUCO E SONHADOR stands out as a symbol of inspiration. They remind us that it is okay to be different, to follow our hearts, and to reach for the stars. So, let us all embrace our inner crazy and dreamer and pursue the lives we truly desire.

The third reading after reading my translation of Islam and after some discussions with the English version, if I said that I understood Wittgenstein, you would think I'm a liar :))

Bennoor's translation is better in some stages than my translation. I think it is not comparable to my translation at all. I benefited a lot from it.

And Bennoor's comments and his introduction are really very good things.

This guy truly drove me completely mad.

His actions and words have caused me so much pain that at times I feel like I could just tear his balls off.

However, there is this strange contradiction within me. I find myself deeply in love with his writing.

It's as if his words have a certain magic that draws me in and keeps me captivated.

But still, the pain he has inflicted lingers.

I have read this book countless times, and yet I still haven't fully grasped what he's trying to say.

I keep telling myself that I'll get it on the 998th reading, but who knows if that will actually happen.

For now, I'm just going to keep reading and hoping that one day, it will all make sense.

Until then, I'll continue to be torn between my love for his writing and my desire to make him pay for the pain he's caused.

I'm a lion, a majestic and powerful creature.

Roaming freely across the vast savannah, I am the king of the jungle.

My golden fur shines in the sunlight, and my roar can be heard for miles, intimidating all those who dare to cross my path.

I am a born predator, with sharp claws and teeth that allow me to hunt with precision and efficiency.

Whether it's a speedy antelope or a massive buffalo, nothing is beyond my reach.

I lead my pride with strength and courage, protecting them from any potential threats.

My presence commands respect and fear, and I am a symbol of power and dominance in the animal kingdom.

Despite my fearsome reputation, I also have a softer side.

I care deeply for my pride, especially the cubs, and will do everything in my power to ensure their safety and well-being.

I am a lion, and I am proud of who I am.

Poets have a remarkable ability to describe the most complex and intangible aspects of human experience. They can capture the essence of a moment, the depth of an emotion, or the beauty of a scene with just a few carefully chosen words. One such aspect that poets can describe is the smell of coffee.

The smell of coffee is a powerful and evocative scent that can bring back memories, create a mood, or simply provide a moment of comfort. It is a smell that is associated with wakefulness, productivity, and creativity. Poets can use their words to describe the rich, earthy aroma of coffee beans, the sharp, bitter smell of freshly brewed coffee, or the sweet, creamy scent of a latte.

In addition to describing the smell of coffee, poets can also explore the emotions and experiences that are associated with it. They can write about the sense of anticipation that comes with waiting for a cup of coffee in the morning, the sense of relaxation that comes with sipping a cup in the afternoon, or the sense of inspiration that comes with working in a coffee shop. Through their words, poets can help us to see and experience the world in a new and different way.

The philosophical work of Wittgenstein is usually divided into two periods, known as the early Wittgenstein and the later one.

His initial philosophy is equivalent to a single work: the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. In it, he addresses the question of the logical relationship between language and the world, which is central in his work, with the ambition of settling it once and for all.

His later philosophy, the language games, began to take shape in the early 1930s. It produced the Philosophical Investigations in 1944 and On Certainty in 1951.

Wittgenstein considered his last book, the Philosophical Investigations, as a synopsis. In fact, he found it extremely difficult to arrange it properly. During the last 20 years of his life, he tried again and again to produce a version of the book that satisfied him, but he never felt that he had achieved it and would not allow the book to be published during his lifetime.

As Wittgenstein points out in a preface, it consists of comments, statements, and thoughts that often seem to jump from one subject to another. He had wanted to weave it into a more fluid work but decided that giving it that direction would make it artificial. It mainly consists of mental experiments and word games. It is easier to read than the Tractatus and does not attempt the exactitude of the previous book. But in both books, what Wittgenstein leaves unsaid (on purpose) is almost more important than the text itself.

For those who are looking for a more leisurely reading, I think this text gets you out of your comfort zone, putting you in the whole decision of taking one of two paths, leaving it aside, or going after Wittgenstein and his sentences.

Hegel was constantly endeavoring to elucidate that things which appear distinct are in fact the same. On the contrary, I strive to impart that things which seem identical are actually different. If I were to have a motto, it would be 'I shall teach you differences'. ---Ludwig Wittgenstein

"I'd like to bring PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS with me to a desert island. Given sufficient time, I might be able to figure out why Wittgenstein is incorrect". ---Ken Follet, British novelist

PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS is the most contentious and divisive book of the twentieth century (for example, try presenting it in France). Similar to other masterpieces such as THE MAGIC MOUNTAIN and FINNEGAN'S WAKE, it remains largely unread despite its growing reputation. Wittgenstein's genius was such that he could elaborate one philosophy, "the picture book theory of language", and then reject it and substitute it with its opposite, "life as a series of language games". That takes courage! Instead of entangling you in the intricacies, I will call upon a metaphor frequently used by Ludwig to illustrate "language games" and why this thesis still disturbs so many people. Suppose I am observing a rain dance, a ritual common to many peoples worldwide. I could conclude that the purpose and significance of the dance are to cause rain. Not so fast, Wittgenstein says. You are confounding function with meaning and description with relevance. The dancers might be dancing out of ethnic pride, or perhaps due to culture lag ("our ancestors always performed this dance"), personal satisfaction, or meanings that we outside observers cannot comprehend. The point is that the rain dance, like all human activities, can be interpreted through different language games, ranging from religion to group solidarity. No one game is privileged over the others. This has destructive and revolutionary implications for everything from psychology to politics to me picking up a seashell on the beach. Wittgenstein thus put an end to philosophy as a search for answers like "what is justice?" or "is consciousness a physical act?" Such questions assume that one language game is dominant. In fact, it is the other way around: "Language speaks through us". After reading the PI, you will never read or see anything in the same way again, for there is no single way to explain anything.

Undoubtedly, Philosophy is more or less a matter of taste. You will agree with some philosophers and not with others. Objectively, however, it is difficult to disagree with Wittgenstein.

More accessible and without the mathematical language of his "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus", the "Philosophical Investigations" with simple examples shows how fluid - and therefore inappropriate - language is as a tool for Philosophy.

Wittgenstein's work challenges our traditional understanding of language and its role in philosophical inquiry. He argues that language is not a fixed and precise system, but rather a flexible and constantly evolving one.

This view has important implications for the way we do philosophy. It means that we cannot rely on language alone to express our ideas and arguments. We must also be aware of the limitations and ambiguities of language and be prepared to use other methods and tools to clarify and communicate our thoughts.

In conclusion, Wittgenstein's "Philosophical Investigations" is a significant work that has had a profound impact on the development of modern philosophy. It forces us to reexamine our assumptions about language and its relationship to philosophy and encourages us to think more deeply about the nature of philosophical inquiry.

You may think you know. But in reality, you don't know. I, for one, still don't truly understand, even though I have been reading this book for years.

However, everything changed for me. I've never thought the same since. This book has the remarkable ability to restructure your mind. It is incredibly powerful, almost to the point of being dangerous.

It's a real fucking effort to read and understand. Surprisingly, I probably learned more from not finishing this book than I did from completing any other. I must have used up multiple red pencils while annotating and trying to make sense of it.

If you dare, read it. But be prepared. It will challenge your preconceived notions and take you on a journey that you may not be fully prepared for.