There was once an arrogant man named Wittgenstein.

He was of the opinion that language could be reduced to mere logic, and with this thought in his mind, he fucked off to Norway.

Upon arriving there, he exclaimed with great confidence: "now philosophy is all mine!"

While reading in his hut, he reached a crossway in his thinking.

He then declared: "My theory was stupid but I will not resign!"

And so, his famous work 'Philosophical Investigations' came into play.

As he sipped his wine, he muttered: "It's all very complicated." Wittgenstein's journey in philosophy was filled with such moments of arrogance, self-doubt, and ultimately, great contributions to the field. His ideas continue to be studied and debated by philosophers around the world.

PI may be the most profound work in all of philosophy, or at least that which most resonates with me.

It delves into the very essence of existence, challenging our preconceived notions and making us question the fundamental nature of reality. The ideas presented in PI are not only intellectually stimulating but also have the power to transform our perspective on life.

Through its exploration of language, thought, and perception, PI invites us to look beyond the surface and discover the hidden depths within ourselves and the world around us. It forces us to grapple with complex concepts and forces us to think critically about our own beliefs and assumptions.

In a world where so much of our thinking is influenced by popular culture and mainstream media, PI offers a refreshing alternative. It encourages us to think for ourselves, to question authority, and to seek the truth for ourselves.

Overall, PI is a work of great significance and value, one that has the potential to change the way we think and live.

Undoubtedly, the main dilemma in PI is the Rule-following problem, as well as the possibility and quality of Communication between people. Wittgenstein's statement, ''you regard it much too much as a matter of course that one can communicate anything to anyone,'' in §363, highlights the complexity of this issue.

Communication is not as straightforward as we often assume. There are various factors that can affect the transmission and understanding of information. For example, different individuals may have different interpretations of the same words or concepts, based on their own experiences, cultural backgrounds, and personal biases.

The Rule-following problem further exacerbates this dilemma. Rules are meant to provide a framework for communication and behavior, but their application is often not clear-cut. There may be multiple ways to follow a rule, and different people may arrive at different interpretations.

To address these challenges, we need to be more aware of the limitations of communication and the importance of context. We should also strive to understand the perspectives of others and be open to different interpretations. By doing so, we can improve the quality of communication and reduce the likelihood of misunderstandings.