Cheever's sensory descriptions in this book are truly remarkable. They have the power to evoke a sense of nostalgia for things that one has never even experienced. For example, take this whale of a sentence:
"The attic was a fitting place for these papers, for this barny summit of the house--as big as a hayloft--with its trunks and oars and tillers and torn sails and broken furniture and crooked chimneys and hornets and wasps and obsolete lamps spread out at one's feet like the ruins of a vanished civilization and with an extraordinary spiciness in the air as if some eighteenth-century Wapshot, drinking Madeira and eating nuts on a sunny beach and thinking about the passing of the season, had tried to capture the heat and light in a flask or hamper and had released his treasure in the attic, for here was the smell of summer without its vitality; here seemed to be the lights and sounds of a summer preserved."
The book is likely worth reading just for passages like this. However, unfortunately, it doesn't have a whole lot else going for it. Half of its characters are crazy, specifically the female half. For some reason, Coverly, Moses, Leander, and the other men in the story mostly act logically and are relatable. On the other hand, the women are either crazy or fraudulent. The kids' mom, Sarah Wapshot, is like a proto-Avril Incandenza, turning Leander's beloved (but wrecked) boat into the country's "only floating gift shop." Aunt Honora Wapshot is admirable in some ways but so crazy that she'll eat a cookie covered in ants. Justina, another old aunt, is even crazier. She never leaves her house, keeps adding new rooms onto it with her fortune while ignoring the old rooms, resulting in things like the ceiling falling in a bedroom or the lights going out all the time. And all the conflict between Justina and everyone she knows turns Melissa, Moses' wife, into a nervous wreck. And so on.
So, even though all of this was fairly entertaining to read, the absurdity of the plot and characters ("Rabelaisian," as a blurb says) doesn't quite mesh with the quaint, realistic descriptions of St. Botolphs and the very conventional coming-of-age plots. Maybe it would be better to just read Cheever's short stories. I've only read a couple of those, but they might offer a more satisfying reading experience.