The Wapshot Chronicle

... Show More
Meet the Wapshots of St Botolphs. There is Captain Leander Wapshot, venerable sea-dog and would-be suicide; his licentious older son, Moses; and Moses's adoring and errant younger brother, Coverly. Tragic and funny, ribald and splendidly picaresque, and partly based on Cheever's adolescence in New England, The Wapshot Chronicle is a stirring family narrative in the finest traditions of Trollope, Dickens, and Henry James

352 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,1957

About the author

... Show More
John Cheever was an American novelist and short story writer, sometimes called "the Chekhov of the suburbs" or "the Ovid of Ossining." His fiction is mostly set in the Upper East Side of Manhattan, the suburbs of Westchester, New York, and old New England villages based on various South Shore towns around Quincy, Massachusetts, where he was born.

His main themes include the duality of human nature: sometimes dramatized as the disparity between a character's decorous social persona and inner corruption, and sometimes as a conflict between two characters (often brothers) who embody the salient aspects of both--light and dark, flesh and spirit. Many of his works also express a nostalgia for a vanishing way of life, characterized by abiding cultural traditions and a profound sense of community, as opposed to the alienating nomadism of modern suburbia.

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
30(30%)
4 stars
35(35%)
3 stars
35(35%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews All reviews
July 15,2025
... Show More
Some truly remarkable passages were present within this work.

However, when considering the story as a whole, it unfortunately came across as rather dull and entirely foreseeable.

The narrative seemed to follow a well-trodden path, lacking the element of surprise and excitement that would have engaged the reader on a deeper level.

Despite the occasional闪光点 in the form of those great passages, they were not sufficient to salvage the overall experience of reading the story.

It left the impression that the author had perhaps played it too safe, relying on familiar tropes and plot devices instead of taking risks and exploring new and innovative territory.

As a result, the story failed to leave a lasting impact and ultimately felt forgettable.
July 15,2025
... Show More
I was truly astonished by the numerous individuals who spoke so rapturously about this novel. I did like it to the extent that I managed to finish it. Cheever indeed showcases a remarkable talent for singling out those significant small details that play a crucial role in bringing a character to life. However, on the whole, I felt that the book was overly long considering the cast of characters who simply weren't all that captivating.


The book doesn't preoccupy itself with the grand themes of life. Instead, it focuses on average people fretting about their children, their jobs, and their relationships. They encounter minor tragedies and equally minor victories, and life just trudges on. There is sex in the story, but while it might have seemed bold and risqué when the book was published in the 1950s, it now appears rather tame. It is described so obliquely that at times I had to go back and reread to realize that sex was even taking place.


One aspect that I did appreciate was Cheever's skill in delving into his characters' emotions by vividly描绘 the setting they were in. He could flawlessly capture a summer afternoon in New England: the gentle breeze wafting off the water, the soft rustling of the wind in the trees, and the sudden nip in the air as the sun disappears behind a cloud. He utilized these physical impressions to accentuate what his characters were thinking and feeling.


Although not strictly autobiographical, the book draws heavily from Cheever's own youth in a small New England town during the first decades of the 20th century. In many instances, the reader gets the distinct impression that the author is describing events that he actually recalls happening. By the 1950s, America had transformed into a vastly different place compared to his youth, and one of the prevailing themes in the book is the sense of loss, that of a simpler, more refined life that has vanished and will never return.


The book features its fair share of eccentric characters, yet none of them are outlandish caricatures. The women hold sway over the men, often regarding them as mere distractions from more vital matters. For the men, there is a sense of being adrift, meandering through life without truly experiencing it. This might have held particular significance in the enforced conformity of the 1950s, but it still strikes a chord today. It comes as no surprise that the book's two sons embark on the most conformist of careers as they reach maturity, one on Wall Street and the other as a civil servant. Each grapples with his relationships with women and eventually attains a sense of equilibrium. And with that, the book doesn't so much conclude as it sort of fades away to a close.


There are certain captivating moments in this book, and at times Cheever is almost poetic in his descriptions of places and sensations. But overall, for me, none of the characters were truly compelling or even especially interesting.
July 15,2025
... Show More
I found this to be a strangely discontinuous book.

On my second reading, I didn't enjoy it as much as I did the first time.

Interestingly, it contains a send-up of someone who might be Isabella Stewart Gardner, which I had never noticed before.

There's nothing inherently wrong with that.

However, I can't help but wonder whether Cheever had much affection for his characters.

Leander and the two boys are the most memorable ones, yet they all experience such outrageous reversals of fortune.

As a result, the overall feeling that pervades the book is one of melancholy.

It's possible that, like Waugh, Cheever is sharply satirizing all these characters as a sort of tease.

But I don't think that's the case.

The book is marvelous for its insights into Cheever's own life, but as a novel, I simply didn't connect with it on a deeper level.

Perhaps it's the disjointed nature of the narrative or the somewhat tragic fates of the characters that made it difficult for me to fully engage.

Nonetheless, it remains a work that offers valuable glimpses into the mind of the author.
July 15,2025
... Show More

After reading The Wapshot Chronicle, my list of to-read books from The Modern Library Top 100 has dwindled to only 16. If I were to remove Ulysses and Pale Fire, that number would further decrease to 14.

I then turn my attention to The Guardian Top 100, where I still have approximately 30 - 40 books remaining. However, I don't expect to find writers like Juan Rulfo or Elsa Morante among them.

Returning to The Wapshot Chronicle, I must admit that this is a book that I truly relished.

The Wapshot Chronicle chronicles the convoluted journey of two brothers, Moses Wapshot and his younger sibling Coverely, as they mature from boys to young adults and ultimately into men.

I was drawn to these two characters and found myself imagining being in their diverse and at times exotic situations. We accompany them on their travels to Hawaii, New York, several Army bases, and the peculiar, dilapidated palace of Justina.

Despite the occurrence of all sorts of strange events and "deviations," I would argue that this is a classic book. At least, it is a "classic" from my perspective - one of those books that I adore. It is strange yet accessible, filled with intrigue and twisting storylines, but not hermetically sealed or "difficult" like Ulysses, which I fear I may not finish in this lifetime, perhaps in the next.

July 15,2025
... Show More
So, there are two distinct types of card games.

The first type is the one that adults typically engage in. In this kind of game, each hand has a significant impact on the subsequent hands. You keep a score, and there is an ultimate objective to achieve.

Then, there are the games that are usually played by kids. In these games, each hand is completely independent. There is no scoring system, and winning a particular hand doesn't give you any advantage.

This book is similar to the second type of card game. If you're not truly invested in the hand you're playing or the chapter you're reading, there's absolutely no reason to pay any attention at all. This is because the following chapter or hand is an entirely new beginning.

I'm aware that this is a rather silly analogy, but it accurately reflects how I felt while reading the book. Half of the time, I simply couldn't be bothered and would have preferred to be watching TV. However, during the other half of the time, I was really into it. Chapter 8 was truly amazing, but it had no connection to chapters 1 - 7 or most of the rest of the book. Characters would just disappear without a trace constantly. I find it难以置信 that it won the National Book Award. Having said that, it's kind of like watching one of those eccentric BBC shows, with its wacky characters, odd situations, and nice set pieces.

Overall, the book has its moments of interest, but it also has some significant flaws that prevent it from being a truly great read.
July 15,2025
... Show More
Meh. That is all the emotion this book evoked in me.

I once read that Cheever was strongly influenced by James Joyce, and it is blatantly obvious here. And I don't mean that in a positive sense.

Cheever is clearly not a novelist. He is a short story writer who attempted to transition to novels, but this work is merely a short story stretched to about 200 pages too long. I was bored countless times.

Nevertheless, he is a competent writer. The book has a good flow, and he has a certain way with words. Sadly, that doesn't translate well into a knack for plotting. The book mainly focuses on character development, which I don't usually have a problem with.

I didn't despise it, nor did I love it. Instead, I simply walked away feeling completely underwhelmed and unemotional.
July 15,2025
... Show More
COMENTÁRIO

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"Crónica de Wapshot"

John Cheever

Tradução de José Miguel Silva.

This is a portrayal of a specific and characteristic part of American society. It is the portrayal of the middle class in a small town in the state of Massachusetts. It is the portrayal of a family that is part of the timeless elites of the community in which it is inserted. It is the portrayal of a society in profound change and transformation.

In this first novel, John Cheever, a prominent short story writer, shows us a skill in the use of language and narrative construction. A skill punctuated by some forms of innovation, such as the use of the diaries of the father of the family, Leander.

The portrayal I speak of is that of the Wapshot brothers who, out of economic necessity, embark on the search for employment, ways of survival, and of course, loves. The second part of the book shows this search, with Cheever presenting to us - sometimes with irony and humor - the inability of the two brothers from the countryside and rural slowness to sing to the inhuman and accelerated rhythm of New York and Washington.

Thus, Cheever constructs a story that involves us as readers and spectators of American society in mutation and of the way in which the personal life story of these two brothers is a paradigm of that social change.

Cheever was a wonderful discovery, an author who has been on the shelves at home for a long time...
July 15,2025
... Show More
First off, this isn't really the kind of topic that would typically interest me for a book. Waspy New England families from a bygone era? Ugh, it just doesn't sound very exciting.

However, it doesn't matter when the prose is as lovely and vivid as it is in this case. Cheever has an amazing talent for making even the most ordinary and otherwise boring things sound beautiful.

From the seemingly random doings of a family in a New England port town, many of the problems and themes that are universal to families emerge. It's quite fascinating to see how he weaves these elements together.

But then, out of nowhere, you start to see through the characters' mundane workaday lives and understand what truly makes them tick. Cheever never really spells it out for us, and he doesn't give us direct access to their innermost contemplations. But by the end, the puzzle pieces start to fit together, and you begin to see why everyone is alternately miserable and satisfied.

Perhaps he's a bit misogynistic, which is kind of a bummer. But I'm afraid it's fairly typical of the 50's, of which this book is a product. Even though my girlfriend thinks the ending is terribly depressing, I find it to be heartbreakingly bittersweet. Sometimes, that's exactly what I want from a book. Something that can make my heart soar and sink at the same time, and I think that's precisely what Cheever accomplishes in this wonderful surprise of a book!
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.