'But you read it,' John Wolf said. 'Why'd you read it?'Indeed. John Irving has mastered the technique of all the great storytellers of the past - that of spinning an absorbing yarn that keeps his audience spellbound. It's just the experience. The interpretation can follow later. *** And there can be countless interpretations if one delves deep into this tale with the eyes of a literary critic. Love, lust, pain, pleasure, feminism, gender issues, parenting... so many elements blend and merge together in both politically correct and incorrect ways. The association of sex with physical impairment begins when Jenny has sex with a brain-impaired sergeant to conceive Garp - because she desires only a baby and wants nothing to do with men. The theme of mutilation persists with Garp's ear being bitten off by a dog, which he later retaliates by biting off the dog's ear; until about two-thirds of the way through, we are presented with a scene of such distressing gore that a less proficient writer would have lost the audience there. (Psychiatrists claim that the pain/pleasure centers of the brain are very close to each other, which is one of the reasons behind sadomasochism. In that sense, "The World According to Garp" reminds me of those posters of Hindu hell that were very common during my childhood - where the stark-naked "souls" were cut, sawed, and impaled in various ways. It was very frightening, but there was a certain element of sexual excitement to it.) Garp's life is a juxtaposition of improbable events, much like the stories he writes. There is an underlying sense of dread in both his fictional world and the real one - the feeling of a monster lurking just behind the next blind corner, licking its lips in anticipation. Both Garp and Irving refer to it as the "Under Toad" - a distortion of the word undertow, as coined by a child. Garp's younger son Walt, when warned of the undertow in a creek that can pull him under, imagines it to be a monstrous toad that lies in wait beneath the still waters. As Garp's life progresses, it becomes a continuous battle against this boogeyman.
'Lawd,' Jillsy said, as if she were sorry for John Wolf - that he was so hopelessly stupid. 'I sometimes wonder if you know the first thing about all these books you're makin',' she said; she shook her head. 'I sometimes wonder why
you're the one who's makin' the books and I'm the one who's cleanin' the bathrooms. Except I'd rather clean the bathrooms than read most of them,' Jillsy said. 'Lawd, Lawd.'
'If you hated it, why'd you read it, Jillsy? John Wolf asked her.
'Same reason I read anythin' for,' Jillsy said. 'To find out what happens.'
...in the world according to Garp, we are all terminal cases.Five stars, without a doubt.
"Mind you, it's awfully well written," Wolf had said. "But it's still, somehow, soap opera; it's too much, somehow." Garp had sighed. "Life," Garp had said, "is too much, somehow. Life is an X-rated soap opera, John," Garp had said.
Continuing on with my reviews of Books and Authors That I Loved But Haven't Read in a While and Need to Revisit, I come across a book that I simply can't recall when I first read it. I think my initial encounter might have been in the mid- to late-80s. However, this doesn't seem right as I would have been in middle school at that time, and the subject matter of the book is far too mature for a middle-schooler. Then again, I remember reading Stephen King's "It" for the first time in 7th or 8th grade.
Regardless, John Irving's "The World According to Garp" was a crucial book in my reading growth. Firstly, it introduced me to Irving, leading me to embark on a journey of desiring to read every single one of his works.
Written in 1978, "Garp" is an epic comedy-drama that chronicles the life of a young man named Garp, who is raised by a militant feminist mother (at least by 1978 standards). The story follows Garp's adventures and misadventures in his social and sexual development.
This book was significant for two main reasons. Firstly, it shaped my own feminist ideology. Secondly, it created a life-long pathological fear of blow jobs (those who have read this novel will understand precisely what I mean...). The 1982 film adaptation starring Robin Williams is a somewhat overlooked film gem. Although it was good, it was definitely not as good as the book. To be fair, though, few if any movies can surpass the original books.
27/08/2023 (****)
One of the strangest and most particular novels that I have ever read.
The book tells the unpredictable life of T.S. Garp, who will become a famous writer, and the very strange collection of relatives and acquaintances who have accompanied his life.
Said like this, it would seem a tragicomic, ironic, surreal work - in the style of Slaughterhouse-Five, so to speak.
However, the only adjective among those mentioned above that fits the novel like a glove is instead surreal; for the rest, it is a disorderly and chaotic, but at the same time well-written and moving, encounter on the violent, bigoted and (some would say) patriarchal America of the post-war years that, not very slowly, transforms into the tumultuous sixties of the sexual revolution.
Here, the novel is above all this: an analysis on sex and the ways in which individuals and society as a whole experience it, in its various meanings - in its mean and sordid libidinous baseness and of mere uncontrollable impulse as well as in its grandeur, of generous impulse towards the beloved partner and of fundamental building block of life and society.
Fundamental, but not preponderant. Almost all the narration of the figure of the adult (and adolescent) Garp focuses mainly there, as well as on the will to become a famous and admired writer. The whole works quite well, I would say up to three-quarters of the book, when Irving in my opinion loses a bit of his compass, and from Garp and his family the story expands touching on ever broader themes, absorbing them within the plot, in a mixture and abundance of themes that seemed excessive to me.
The book is pervaded by a remarkable black humor and a vein of cynicism that however do not marry well with the account of Garp's and his family's life, marked by such a number of dramatic events and conflicts that no normal person in this world would bear while maintaining intact the underlying irony that characterizes the book from the first to the last page. The characters are remarkable, but too unrealistic to be real. A similar speech can be made about the whole novel and its plot, which continuously oscillates in a blatant way between pure fiction and crude reality, confusing the reader.
The rest is mainly anxiety (of performance - in all senses), misunderstanding (especially between the sexes), disappointment, told well and in such a way as to make you feel sorry for the protagonists and their troubles.
Among the pros, the novel is very well written and - apart from episodes, descriptions and parts that are frankly useless and pleonastic - very enjoyable to read.
If you think of picking up something like Slaughterhouse-Five or like certain writings of Vonnegut, know that you are picking up the wrong book; but in any case you would be making a mistake for a good cause.
The book is worth reading and the protagonists, in their surreal way of being, will enter your heart.