...
Show More
The setting of this novel is truly captivating. Kars, a city in a remote corner of Turkey, once boasted a glorious past but now finds itself rather marginal and gloomy. Isolated from the world by a snow blizzard, it becomes the stage for some dramatic events over the course of a couple of days. This immediately reminded me of the city of Oran in Albert Camus' La Peste, and through the snow, also of the Davos in Thomas Mann's Magic Mountain. What's more, in Kars, we witness a famous Turkish poet, Ka, wandering around, rather spineless in the face of events. This makes the parallel with Franz Kafka's Das Schloss abundantly clear.
There is indeed some action in this work, including a military coup with numerous casualties. However, it is primarily a "talking" novel. Pamuk delves deep into the almost endless Turkish discussions regarding the country's own identity - European or not? - and the place of religion in society - Kemalism versus the rising Islamism. This requires a certain knowledge of Turkish affairs, to be sure, but it is presented in a highly interesting manner, especially in light of the islamophobia in the West after 9/11. The novel jumps from one discussion to another, with varying participants, which demands some stamina from the reader, but it is well worth the effort. Admirably, Pamuk offers no simplifications or caricatures, from either side. On the contrary, both atheists and islamists often express doubts about their beliefs or positions, both grappling with existential loneliness. The common thread throughout these disputations is the ambiguous attitude all the protagonists have towards Europe, or the West: a combination of attraction and repulsion. Needless to say, the characters in this novel are burdened with numerous inferiority complexes, making it a highly instructive read.
With "Snow", Pamuk not only presents a highly political novel but also reveals a clear postmodernist side. There is a reflection on what writing is and what meaning art can bring in the real world. After all, we see how Ka, in Kars, suddenly pulls 19 poems from his sleeve after years of creative drought. In this way, he can give a place to everything he experiences. Moreover, there is the story of Ka himself, his wanderings between Kemalists and Islamists, his relationship with the stunning Ipek, and the associated hope and suffering. Pretty soon in the novel, we learn that this story is being told by a friend of Ka, a fellow writer. But it is only at the end that we realize that this presumed objective narrator has filled in a large number of elements himself, especially regarding the inner life of Ka. This explains why the character of Ka makes such a volatile impression and regularly switches from one opinion to another.
So, it is truly remarkable how Pamuk manages to bring all these layers together. Nevertheless, I am not completely overwhelmed. The verbosity of the novel can sometimes be excessive, some scenes are absurdly theatrical, the endless wanderings of Ka really push the patience of the reader to the limit, and some elements have been developed rather weakly, such as Ka's puppy love for Ipek and the character of Ipek herself, as well as the other female figures. Overall, this is definitely a great novel, but it does have some flaws. I still enjoyed reading it, though. (3.5 stars)
There is indeed some action in this work, including a military coup with numerous casualties. However, it is primarily a "talking" novel. Pamuk delves deep into the almost endless Turkish discussions regarding the country's own identity - European or not? - and the place of religion in society - Kemalism versus the rising Islamism. This requires a certain knowledge of Turkish affairs, to be sure, but it is presented in a highly interesting manner, especially in light of the islamophobia in the West after 9/11. The novel jumps from one discussion to another, with varying participants, which demands some stamina from the reader, but it is well worth the effort. Admirably, Pamuk offers no simplifications or caricatures, from either side. On the contrary, both atheists and islamists often express doubts about their beliefs or positions, both grappling with existential loneliness. The common thread throughout these disputations is the ambiguous attitude all the protagonists have towards Europe, or the West: a combination of attraction and repulsion. Needless to say, the characters in this novel are burdened with numerous inferiority complexes, making it a highly instructive read.
With "Snow", Pamuk not only presents a highly political novel but also reveals a clear postmodernist side. There is a reflection on what writing is and what meaning art can bring in the real world. After all, we see how Ka, in Kars, suddenly pulls 19 poems from his sleeve after years of creative drought. In this way, he can give a place to everything he experiences. Moreover, there is the story of Ka himself, his wanderings between Kemalists and Islamists, his relationship with the stunning Ipek, and the associated hope and suffering. Pretty soon in the novel, we learn that this story is being told by a friend of Ka, a fellow writer. But it is only at the end that we realize that this presumed objective narrator has filled in a large number of elements himself, especially regarding the inner life of Ka. This explains why the character of Ka makes such a volatile impression and regularly switches from one opinion to another.
So, it is truly remarkable how Pamuk manages to bring all these layers together. Nevertheless, I am not completely overwhelmed. The verbosity of the novel can sometimes be excessive, some scenes are absurdly theatrical, the endless wanderings of Ka really push the patience of the reader to the limit, and some elements have been developed rather weakly, such as Ka's puppy love for Ipek and the character of Ipek herself, as well as the other female figures. Overall, this is definitely a great novel, but it does have some flaws. I still enjoyed reading it, though. (3.5 stars)