912 pages, Paperback
First published January 1,2003
Okay, this is Review 1/2. I still have to chew my way through "Rabbit at Rest", but given the following, I'm likely going to come back to it much later in 2019.
"Rabbit is Rich" was surprisingly filthy. It was so dirty that I felt strange reading it in the house around my family. The plot was non-existent. The characters, aside from Rabbit, were undeveloped. And the gravitational pull of Rabbit on several other characters was inexplicable. Maybe more of this was fleshed out in the earlier two books. (I vaguely remember reading one of them in college.) But for a stand-alone Pulitzer winner, this was a massive disappointment. Maybe white [upper] middle class ennui was more revelatory at the time of publication, but I got almost nothing out of this.
Also, I realized I've been confusing John Updike with John Irving my entire life. Sorry, Johns.