Finally read this horror classic!
I've seen this movie so many times that it was truly fascinating to notice the differences, both big and small. The details that one might overlook in the movie can often be more vividly described in the book.
I'm going to watch the movie with fresh eyes tonight, looking for those elements that I might have missed before. It will be interesting to see how the director has interpreted the story and brought it to life on the screen.
Next week, I will post a detailed book/movie comparison. I'll analyze the plot, characters, and atmosphere in both the book and the movie, highlighting the similarities and differences. This will give readers a better understanding of how the story has been adapted and which version they might prefer.
It is truly more like a 3.5. But you know, that's just the way it is. Hey ho! There are times when things don't quite fit neatly into a specific category or number. In this case, it leans towards a 3.5. Maybe it has some qualities that are a bit better than a 3, but not quite up to a 4. But rather than getting too hung up on it, we just have to accept it and move on. Hey ho!
Mix a heaping helping of exposition, a generous spoonful of backstory, a man struggling with alcoholism and a pinch of scares. Shake and pour over ice. Voila! La cocktail de Shining.
Okay, I admit it. This book didn't scare me to the same degree as the film did. However, that doesn't change the fact that King is a stellar writer. He is highly adept at writing complicated, troubled characters. The story centers on a man named Jack Torrence, who is a writer and a struggling alcoholic. My understanding is that Stephen King was also struggling with addiction while he wrote The Shining. So, it understandably conveys Jack Torrence's aspiration for redemption.
I think that having seen the film first established expectations that the book couldn't meet. But I've read that King didn't like Kubrick's film, and now I understand why. The film centered on the victims of Jack Torrence's crazy behavior and it wasn't about redemption at all. King's book, in contrast, explores a troubled man's efforts to overcome his demons for the sake of his family.
I suppose this is all to say that expectations are key when picking up this book. Let it be what it is rather than expecting it to be the horror-show that Kubrick imagined. Click here to watch a video review of this book on my channel, From Beginning to Bookend.
It didn't work out... I loved "Misery", but I thought "The Shining" was a drag...
Perhaps my expectations for "The Shining" were too high. After all, it's a classic horror movie. However, I just didn't find it as engaging as I had hoped. The story seemed to unfold too slowly, and I didn't feel a strong connection with the characters.
On the other hand, "Misery" was a completely different experience. It kept me on the edge of my seat from start to finish. The acting was superb, and the plot was full of twists and turns that kept me guessing. I would highly recommend "Misery" to anyone who enjoys a good thriller.
In conclusion, while I may not have loved "The Shining", I still appreciate its place in cinematic history. And I'm glad that I was able to discover the gem that is "Misery".