I finally came across a Morrison book that I don't have a liking for.
The book is intended to imitate jazz music, aiming to be unpredictable and almost improvisational. While this might function well in the realm of music, I don't believe it translates effectively into a novel. And if Morrison, with all her talent and skill, can't make it succeed, then perhaps no one can.
Despite the ambition and the effort that went into this work, I'm still glad that I read it. However, Morrison's experimentation with form has caused the novel to lack cohesion. The various disparate parts, some of which are beautiful and others not so much, when added together, amount to not much more than the first paragraph or the blurb on the back cover. It's a disappointment considering the high expectations one has for a Morrison novel.
Someone please explain to me how it's possible that Morrison can write a book in such a chaotic manner. Her work is filled with mysterious first-person narrators, and she switches points of view without any indication of who is speaking. She throws in random characters back and forth as she pleases, and transitions from one place to another in a non-smooth way. As a result, you're left looking at the page, completely confused, wondering "WTF how did that happen?" Moreover, she randomly jumps from past tense to present tense. It's truly baffling. And yet, people still consider this a classic. Oh, Morrison's the best writer in America!!1!!111!!!!1
Her writing style is so unique and unconventional that it challenges the traditional norms of storytelling. While some may argue that her lack of clarity and structure adds to the depth and complexity of her work, others find it frustrating and difficult to follow. Nevertheless, Morrison's impact on the literary world cannot be denied. Her books have won numerous awards and have been widely studied and analyzed. But for those of us who struggle to make sense of her writing, it remains a mystery as to why she is considered such a great writer.