512 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1,2001
A superb biography indeed! It delves deep into the life of the subject, presenting a comprehensive and detailed account. However, at times, it can feel a bit dense, perhaps overly so. But despite this minor drawback, it manages to create a strong and vivid portrait of the woman. We get to know not just her as a person, but also as a thinker and a novelist. Her thoughts, her ideas, and her creative process are all laid out before us. It's a fascinating read that offers valuable insights into her life and work. Whether you're a fan of her novels or simply interested in learning more about this remarkable woman, this biography is well worth your time.
Conradi's Murdoch bio is truly a letdown and a tiresome read. He does write with a certain level of proficiency. Even though he is a friend of Murdoch and Bayley, the book is not a glorified hagiography. However, the proportion is completely off, seriously askew indeed. In the 600 pages of text (followed by over 100 pages of notes and index), Murdoch finally publishes her first novel, Under the Net, on page 384. Then, she first becomes seriously ill on page 588 and is dead by page 592. The text is jumpy and choppy. Conradi never fails to be reminded of Elias Canetti and jumps back to musings about the 1950s. There is way more information about names in and around Oxford than one would want to know, often causing the reader to lose track of Iris herself in the midst of all the shuffling.
A Tedious Read
I have a passion for literary biographies. However, in this particular book by Conradi, it was not until much later that he delved into Murdoch's writing. The extensive details provided about the lives, words, and experiences of others seemed rather tangential. To be honest, even though I couldn't make it past page 200, I still didn't have a clear understanding of who Murdoch was.
The early part of the book seemed to focus more on peripheral aspects rather than the central figure, Murdoch. It left me feeling somewhat frustrated and disengaged. I was eager to learn about Murdoch's literary journey, his creative process, and the essence of his works. But unfortunately, that crucial information was not forthcoming in the initial pages.
Perhaps if the author had structured the book differently and introduced Murdoch's writing earlier on, it would have been a more captivating read. As it stands, I was left with a sense of dissatisfaction and a lack of knowledge about the subject I was most interested in.