It's truly a remarkable book. At the very beginning, I didn't have a favorable impression of it. However, the reason for this was that I was approaching it as a mere adventure book, rather than perceiving it for what it truly is - a satire. This particular book serves as a scathing satire that effectively criticizes the scientists, philosophers, and politicians of that era in England. It's simply amazing how the author manages to convey such powerful messages through this literary work. The way in which the various characters and their actions are portrayed provides a vivid and thought-provoking commentary on the society of that time. It makes one stop and reflect on the absurdities and follies that often exist within different aspects of our own lives and society. Overall, it's a book that demands to be read and understood for its true value and significance.
Gulliver's Travels is a series of consecutive events on the face of humanity on Friday. When the rational Houyhnhnms reject Gulliver gently, it's because they are more prepared and advanced than him. So, let's count, dear "Gulliver," your four voyages. It's very sad.
These stories have a special place in my heart. They were my first long journeys into the world of fantasy and boundless imagination. Through the delicate translation of the complete Arabic version by Kilani, I read it in my tenth year in pure Arabic with correct spelling. And my enthusiasm didn't fade.
I then read its abridged version in English and later its complete version at the age of 30.
I liked the tiny people of Lilliput, their silly customs, and traditions. Also, the Brobdingnagian giants who revealed Gulliver's folly and delusion. And the philosophers, the sorcerers, and the immortal Struldbrugs.
Finally, despite his profound philosophical imagination, Swift didn't achieve his goal of the war he declared on humanity. His book was published in many editions, but everyone laughed at the adventures and considered them oddities about the follies of other peoples.
And so Swift left silently, having lost his mind.
The style is old and in the form of memoirs, and so is the language. Therefore, it may be easier for some to read it abridged as it belongs to the year 1700. But the follies, the vanities, and the wars, they are what they are and will remain so.