The story is about Gulliver's journey to four strange and remarkable places.

First, he arrives in the land of Lilliput, where he appears as a giant among a race of tiny people. The Lilliputians are amazed by his size and initially treat him with suspicion.

Next, Gulliver travels to Brobdingnag, a place where the natives are giants and he seems puny in comparison. Here, he faces many challenges and has to adapt to his new environment.

After that, he visits the ruined yet magical country of Laputa. The people of Laputa are preoccupied with abstract thoughts and have strange technological inventions.

Finally, Gulliver reaches the home of the Houyhnhnms, gentle horses who are far superior to the ugly humanoid Yahoos that share their universe. The Houyhnhnms live in a peaceful and rational society, and Gulliver is impressed by their way of life.

Overall, Gulliver's travels take him to some truly extraordinary places and introduce him to a wide variety of strange and wonderful beings.

There was some truly fascinating social and political commentary presented in this piece, particularly within Parts III and IV. I really valued and appreciated that aspect of it.

Now, I understand that this complaint might seem a bit off-topic, but it's my sincere grievance and I feel compelled to state it. Why on earth did this individual ever decide to get married and have children in the first place? He is constantly embarking on adventures, as if he simply cannot endure being at home for more than a couple of months consecutively. He has an insatiable craving for the open seas.

Moreover, whenever he is engaged in these adventures, he never appears to miss his family back home. It seems more like an afterthought, almost a convenient and tidy way of concluding each story. On the last page, it's always "and then I returned home to my wife and children." The end. It's rather annoying, to be honest.

It makes one wonder about the true nature of his commitment to his family and whether his actions are truly in line with the responsibilities that come with marriage and parenthood.

Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift is an iconic classic. It tells the adventures of an English surgeon-turned-ship captain as he voyages to far-off corners of the world. First published in 1726, it quickly gained popularity and has remained in print ever since. Swift, a clergyman and Irish writer, used this book as a satire on human nature and a parody of the “traveller’s tales” genre. It is also considered his best work and a classic of English literature. The inspiration for the book is thought to be Cavehill in Belfast.

The book contains many thought-provoking quotes, such as “Difference in opinions has cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether the juice of a certain berry be blood or wine.” It also satirizes the European government and questions the nature of human corruption. Even today, the events in the book can be related to the hypocrisy, corruption, and politics of the present day.

I found this book to be an intelligent and engaging read. It kept me hooked until the very end and left me reflecting on what I had just read. It is a book that can be enjoyed by both adults and children. Adults will appreciate the deeper themes and questions it raises, while children will find it humorous, witty, and imaginative. Overall, I give Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift 4.5 out of 5 stars and highly recommend it to everyone.

  Read the complete Book Review by Njkinny and book quotes on Njkinny's Blog

My likeness of this book is greatly inflated by the fact that I read it straight through with a pot of coffee in a hostel in Costa Rica when I was homesick.

It was an amazing experience then and I firmly believe it should still hold the same charm now.

The combination of being in a foreign land, missing home, and having this book to immerse myself in was truly special.

As I sipped on my coffee and turned the pages, I was transported into the world of the story, temporarily forgetting my feelings of longing.

The book became a source of comfort and entertainment during that difficult time.

Even now, whenever I think of that moment in the hostel, I remember the book fondly and look forward to reading it again to relive those emotions.

I am confident that it will still have the power to captivate me and provide the same sense of escape and enjoyment.

The closest edition I could find to the one I'm actually reading is also by Bantam. However, mine was published in 1962 and has a distinct cover illustration.

It's quite interesting to note the differences between the various editions. The 1962 publication likely holds a certain charm and historical significance.

The cover illustration on my copy might have been designed to appeal to the tastes and sensibilities of that particular era.

It makes me wonder how the content has been received and interpreted over the years, given the different visual presentations.

Despite the differences in the cover, the essence of the story within remains the same.

It's a testament to the enduring power of the written word that even with these external variations, the book continues to captivate readers.

I'm looking forward to delving deeper into this unique edition and uncovering its hidden treasures.

I finally made it all the way through.

It is truly fascinating to read this work as a political satire during an election year.

The last chapter about the race of Yahoos left a particularly strong impression on me.

Surprisingly, despite the passage of centuries, many things seem to remain unchanged.

However, it is highly interesting to explore this perspective and consider historically what was taking place in terms of culture, social norms, and so on.

This reading experience allows us to gain a deeper understanding of the past and perhaps draw some parallels with the present.

It serves as a reminder that history often repeats itself, and by examining these works of literature, we can better navigate the complex political and social landscapes of our own times.

Overall, it has been a thought-provoking and engaging journey through this piece of literature.

I have a great love for satire. However, this particular satire would have made a significantly greater amount of sense to me if I had possessed a more profound and in-depth knowledge of 17th century British history. There are numerous parallels that can be drawn between this book and Babel.

It is truly fascinating to observe how the themes and ideas presented in this satire seem to echo and mirror those found in Babel. The exploration of power, class, and social hierarchies is a common thread that runs through both works.

Without a solid understanding of the historical context in which the satire is set, some of the subtleties and nuances may be lost on the reader. This is why I now realize the importance of delving deeper into the history of that era to fully appreciate and understand the true essence of this satire.

I look forward to further educating myself about 17th century British history and then revisiting this satire to gain a more comprehensive and enlightened perspective.

You would never suspect, but this work is actually a pointed critique of European Colonialism and the assumed idea of the era of 'European Superiority'.

It goes far beyond the simplified children versions that often gloss over the harsh realities and injustices of that period. Instead, it delves deep into the complex issues, shedding light on the true nature of colonial rule.

What makes it even more remarkable is the good sense of humour that is interwoven throughout. This not only makes the reading experience more engaging but also allows for a more palatable way to approach such a沉重的 topic.

By using humour, the author is able to disarm the reader and make them more receptive to the underlying message. It is a clever and effective strategy that enhances the overall impact of the critique.

Overall, this work offers a refreshing and thought-provoking perspective on European Colonialism and the era of 'European Superiority', challenging our assumptions and making us think more critically about this important period in history.

You simply have to love "Gulliver's Travels." It is truly a remarkable work. However, when it comes to his essays, they were rather inconsistent. "A Modest Proposal" is an absolute must-read for every individual. It presents a unique and thought-provoking perspective. Yet, I found myself skimming through some of the other essays. These were the ones that were making some fine point about a particular political policy that he disapproved of. The problem is that this policy has very little relevance to society today. In fact, when looked at from a historical perspective, it really seems blown out of proportion. It's interesting to see how Swift's views on certain political matters have aged and how they compare to the current social and political landscape.

I did not truly relish Gulliver's Travels. The reason being that the manner in which Gulliver relates the story is extremely tedious and protracted. There are countless pages filled with descriptions that simply turn dull.

It is indeed beneficial to be acquainted with the story. However, it is an incredibly long and uninteresting book. The excessive details and the slow pace of the narrative make it a rather tiresome read.

Perhaps if the author had presented the story in a more engaging and concise way, it would have been more enjoyable. But as it stands, it requires a great deal of patience and perseverance to get through.

Overall, while Gulliver's Travels may have some value in terms of its content and ideas, the execution leaves much to be desired.

I vividly remember that this seemed to be a great deal more interesting when I was a child.

Perhaps I was reading a children's or abridged version back then. This time around, I couldn't even manage to finish part one.

It's truly a pity because, in all fairness, it does indeed sound like a really captivating story.

However, it just doesn't hold the same allure while I'm actually in the process of reading it.

Maybe it's because my perspective has changed as I've grown older, or perhaps the original text is just too complex for my current state of mind.

Nonetheless, I still have a glimmer of hope that I might be able to rediscover the magic of this story at some point in the future.

I read this at the turn of the millennium, along with Ambrose Bierce and H. L. Mencken. It seemed like an ideal time to get to know the great cynics of the English language. I was mainly familiar with Gulliver through various child-oriented media adaptations and had never truly experienced the whole story as it was intended - as a satire of European society in the Age of "Enlightenment." Fortunately, this version gave me that opportunity. It was also annotated to provide context for some of what Swift was lampooning and offered a chance to read a few of his other works.

“Gulliver’s Travels” is a novel-length tale that takes up just over half the volume. I think it is the most easily accessible to a modern reader among the works here. It is a thrilling adventure story, similar in some ways to “Robinson Crusoe.” A hapless traveler is castaway in unexplored regions of the Earth’s oceans and must fend for himself in a strange environment. Fortunately (mostly) for Gulliver, the islands he encounters are inhabited, but by various strange beings whose customs and physical forms he must adapt to. The most well-known of these are the Lilliputians, who are only six inches tall. They have a fairly European culture despite their small size, and Gulliver gets along well with them. He ultimately arbitrates in a war with their miniature neighbors that starts over which side of an egg one “ought” to crack open. This part mocks the minor points of theology that divided Englishmen at the time and can be extended to any sectarian dispute or cause for war. He later encounters a land of giants where he seems like a Lilliputian, as well as the dreaded Yahoos and the noble Houyhnhnms, a race descended from horses who are clearly superior to humans. Throughout, the language and descriptions are delightful, and there is enough action to hold the attention of a modern reader.

“The Tale of a Tub,” “The Battle of the Books,” and “The Mechanical Operation of the Spirit” are shorter pieces that satirize English learned society in its spiritual hypocrisy, divisiveness, and disregard for tradition. “The Tale of a Tub” is rather difficult to read, based on disputes of the day and using intentionally exaggerated language. However, it does contain a good parody of the three major Christian sects of the day and their lack of respect for their heritage. “Battle of the Books” is more exciting, with a library coming to life and drawing lines between “Ancients” and “Moderns” who conduct an amusing war with each other. The “Ancients” are presumed to win due to their greater substance. In some ways, it is a commentary on the proliferation of writing made possible by the printing press and the corresponding decline in quality as quantity increased. This could also be relevant to today’s explosion of electronic publishing. “Mechanical Operation of the Spirit” is a sort of parody of the “Enthusiastic” religious trend of his day, essentially arguing that they have confused sensual pleasure for religious devotion.

Also worth noting are “A Modest Proposal” and “The Abolishing of Christianity.” Both satirize positions in an extreme way, making it seem as if the author is arguing for the exact opposite of what he wants. Instead, he is showing the logical conclusion of his opponent’s arguments and thereby destroying that position. In “A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Ireland from Being Poor,” Swift satirically argues that the kindest approach to the problem of Ireland within the Empire would be to start eating Irish babies and prevent their continued procreation. It is important to note that Swift was Irish himself and felt that the English had no right to try to suppress the Irish national spirit. “The Abolishing of Christianity in England” essentially argues that if the Church of England continues on its current course, there will be no future for Christianity in England. He pretends to be arguing against an already-decided course and very humbly suggests that Christianity’s merits may be being overlooked, but in fact, he is arguing very strongly that the political and religious developments in England are appalling.

There are several more small pieces in the book, including some of Swift’s poetry, which varies from difficult to delightful. The whole is well worth the time of anyone interested in modern English writing and thought and its historical development.