...
Show More
I can't believe the high ratings that other readers have given this book. I must be the weirdo. First of all, I didn't have a particular liking or identification with any of the characters. We're supposed to root for Jack, who has been falsely accused twice. However, we are shown what a horrible person he was when he was younger. He engaged in the exact same egregious behavior that emotionally scarred the woman he now supposedly loves. Pretty much all of the girls were brats, and most of the men were creeps. Jack, a high school teacher, thinks it's okay to let his students run around practically naked to get them interested in history? A girl's bra just happens to fall off on the football field during this "lesson," and he takes it HOME with him? What on earth was he thinking? And then he DRIVES the same girl to another town to get birth control pills? I can't comprehend any of this. Selena, a very intelligent and educated 38-year-old woman, didn't know what "wicca" meant and had to Google it? Why tell us about Gillian cutting the bottom of her feet? It never came up again. When Addie heard from Jay that Jack was busy every night at 7:00 pm, she didn't automatically think: "Jeopardy!" I did. And for Pete's sake, why didn't Jack have a VCR? Did he miss parent-teacher conferences because he had to watch "Jeopardy!"? And I kept thinking that all of that trivia was there for a reason, that somehow it was going to figure in his defense. But no. No reason. Why did Jack's mother turn on him? Did I miss something crucial? We saw why she went from being a snob to being a caring woman, but did she turn against Jack later because she believed that women who claimed to have been raped were 100% right, and the men they accused were 100% horrible? I thought early on that something creepy was going on with Gillian and her father. I guess we should assume that was his semen on her thigh, from an earlier encounter. There was talk of related DNA, but I thought it was implied that the semen might have come from a relative of the attacker. So they suspected it might be the relative of the victim? That didn't raise any red flags? And why didn't they just get a semen sample from Jack? And the book ends with Amos getting away with rape, incest, and molestation? And seriously, can a witness bring muffins into a courtroom and pass them out to the jury et al.? Overall, I was very disappointed in this book. I had previously read "My Sister's Keeper," which I thought was pretty good, but I probably won't spend the time on another Picoult. P.S. She gets an extra point for the literary references. But maybe that credit should go to Arthur Miller, anyway.