Language indeed has a certain structure. We have to reach agreements on some aspects of it, and establishing rules and definitions around those mutual understandings helps to enhance intelligibility within the language.
Similarly, the agreement to follow these rules implies that we can teach communication. This is not only applicable to children but simplifies the process for them. It also means that writers can continuously learn, interact, and write in a comprehensible and efficient manner.
We draw these rules from traditions as well as common sense. Strunk's rulings on word usage, especially among words with similar meanings, are based on root words and their original meanings. Strunk aims to distinguish these similar words so that instead of having mere synonyms, we have two words that are similar yet precise.
This also avoids confusion as different English dialects might use these words differently, but they all share the same roots.
However, language is constantly evolving, making it difficult to regulate and impose rules on it. Many people believe that it suppresses creativity or gives hegemonic power to the elite. One advantage of this regulation is that we can read Shakespeare with relatively little difficulty today.
Dictionaries became popular around the time of Shakespeare, as did the study of philology. We have more trouble reading Chaucer, even though only two hundred years separate Chaucer and Shakespeare, while twice that time separates Shakespeare from us.
The work of Strunk and White is not about closing off language or setting it completely free. Instead, it is about conducting a linguistic analysis of its forms, meanings, and changes in a way that the average person can understand. The work may seem a bit outdated by today's standards, but it actually serves as a perfect example for many of the book's observations on the mutability of language.
It also supports the claim that language may change, but not as much as one might expect. Strunk and White is just as valuable to an author today as it was when it was compiled.
It is a light-hearted and often humorous work that presents language and communication in a thoughtful manner. Any writer should finish reading this book with a newfound respect for language and a more discerning eye for their own writing.
While the book sometimes appears strict in its regulations, this is only because misuse is so widespread and unattractive. Similarly, someone might tell you "under no circumstances should you balance on a chair on the edge of the roof of a ten-story building." This rule is perfectly reasonable, even though some well-trained and adventurous individuals are capable of performing this feat.
The fact remains that for the majority, violating these simple rules will lead to an unappealing mess. A talented and experienced writer can flout and even break the rules when it is appropriate. The greatest writers do so, and this book provides examples of how and why they do it.
However, rules are the means by which we create meaning. Whether you follow them or break them, you must know and understand how they work in order to communicate effectively with your reader. You cannot subvert an idea unless you understand it, and you cannot convey anything to your reader that has no basis in their experiences and understanding.
There is no remarkable act of creation that is not conscious and deliberate, because rebellion cannot occur in a vacuum. It is the rule that validates the exception.
I made up my mind to read this book with the intention of enhancing my Goodreads reviews. But don't get your hopes up too high. The moment I began reading, I was well aware that I was in a bit of a pickle. I couldn't recall what a gerund was and had to look it up. The last time I diagrammed a sentence was way back in my 8th grade public school class in 1967. Thank you, Mrs. Redmond! She was indeed a great teacher. She also taught us how to use a library card catalog. Those were truly ancient times. Later on, I taught many of my fellow state college freshmen classmates how to use one.
It has taken me nearly two months to complete these 85 pages. I could only read a few examples at a time for them to really soak in. I didn't purchase an English Grammar book to brush up on sentence structure. Life is just too short. Especially now that I'm retired and 90% of my writing is done via text. I don't really feel the need to bother as long as my Goodreads friends remain patient. Thankfully, I can't see your eye-rolling over the internet. I will continue to use my "whatever sounds right to my ear" style method. If I post something and later discover a blunder, I'm not too proud to go back and re-post after making the correction. Yes, I'm one of those annoying people.
NOTE: A wonderful thing that I learned - E.B. White wrote Charlotte's Web!