460 pages, Paperback
First published January 1,1952
For those who are passionate about Hemingway, this is an absolute essential read! Hemingway's works have always been highly regarded for their unique writing style and profound themes. His words have the power to transport readers to different times and places, making them feel as if they are right there in the story. This particular piece is no exception. It offers a captivating look into Hemingway's world, filled with vivid descriptions and engaging characters. Whether you are a long-time fan or new to his work, you are sure to be enthralled by this must-read article. So, don't miss out on this opportunity to explore the genius of Hemingway.
For his effort and dedication, Baker truly deserves five stars. However, I find myself in disagreement with him on numerous issues, especially regarding what appears to be his central point, which is the 'symbolism' in Hemingway's work.
It is true that he has some valid points, although he does tend to overemphasize and exaggerate, making his conclusions a bit too excessive. Moreover, he seems to attach far too much 'significance' to that symbolism. After wading through his often remarkably dense analyses that demand 'close reading' (but not in the way he tells us to approach Hemingway), one不禁 asks oneself, 'And? So what?'
One factor that works against him is an almost hagiographic zeal. He is so firmly convinced that Hemingway was 'an artist' that one gets the impression that anyone like me, who holds the position of 'yes, but not half as "great" an artist as was long believed,' would simply be regarded by him as either crazy or stubbornly contrary.
Hemingway did possess a certain way with words, but his strength lay in description, often of nature. However, his ability to convey the subtleties of human emotion and thinking was rather lacking. And that, in a 'celebrated novelist,' is indeed very bad news. Furthermore, Hemingway's subject matter was almost always himself.
Although there are four editions of Baker's book and he claims to have rewritten several chapters and 'corrected' one or two errors, he did not correct enough of them. Even in the fourth edition, he perpetuates Hemingway's fiction that he'soldiered' in WWI. Baker describes him as 'a veteran,' but in the sense that most people would understand, he was not at all. His total service consisted of two weeks driving an ambulance behind the lines, two weeks manning a rest and recreation station serving coffee and handing out chocolate and cigarettes, and then, after several months in the hospital and returning to duty, he contracted jaundice within days and was back in the hospital. That was it. So much for 'a veteran.'
Regarding matters of error, Baker also becomes very confused about the two African plane crashes. Hemingway and the others escaped almost unharmed from the first crash, but he sustained terrible injuries in a second crash the following day. Baker attributes those injuries to the first crash, even in the fourth edition. Such blunders do cause some concern.
Therefore, I give it three stars.
NB For a slightly different perspective on Hemingway, visit https://hemingway-pfg.blogspot.com/p/...