Hemingway is widely regarded as one of the most influential and talented writers of the 20th century. However, when it comes to his novels, some may argue that there is one that stands out as his weakest. While it is difficult to objectively label any of his works as such, this particular novel may not have achieved the same level of acclaim and success as some of his others.
Perhaps the plot was not as engaging or the characters not as fully developed. It could be that the writing style, which is typically known for its简洁 and powerful prose, did not quite shine through in this particular work. Or maybe it was simply a case of bad timing, with the novel being released during a period when the literary landscape was changing.
Despite being considered Hemingway's weakest novel, it still contains elements of his unique voice and perspective. It may offer insights into his creative process and the evolution of his writing. And while it may not be as highly regarded as some of his masterpieces, it still has its own value and place in the literary canon.
It may not be ranked among Hemingway's greatest works, yet you can still detect his presence within this novel. Here, he appears more melancholic and melodramatic, as if an old man is in love with a very young girl, a relationship doomed to hopelessness. The story is about war and some duck hunting. Had it been penned by someone else, perhaps it would have been regarded as a good book. However, being written by Hemingway, it is only considered an okay book. But it is more than that.
In his own words:
"Book is truly very good [Across the River and Into the Trees]. You pan it to hell if you don’t like it. That is your right and your duty. But I have read it 206 times to try and make it better and to cut out any mistakes or injustices and on the last reading I loved it very much and it broke my fucking heart for the 206th time. This is only a personal reaction and should be discounted as such. But have been around quite a while reading and writing and can tell shit from the other things…."
"But pan it, ride it, or kill it if you should or if you can."
to Robert Cantwell, 1950 (Selected Letters, p. 711)
The article titled "My Top 5 Hemingway Books" provides an interesting perspective. It specifically mentions a particular work that offers a remarkable portrayal of post-War Venice. In this portrayal, Venice is depicted as a place full of thriving life, yet at the same time, it serves as a symbol of death. This duality adds a layer of complexity to the narrative. Additionally, it is noted that this work contains one of Hemingway's most delicate love stories. The mention of "sex on a moving gondola" further piques the reader's interest and adds a touch of scandal and excitement. Overall, the article gives a tantalizing glimpse into what must be a fascinating Hemingway book that explores the multifaceted nature of Venice and the intricacies of love and life.
Not Hemingway's best.
Sometimes a writer has a particular "voice" or milieu that suits them well. If they are astute, they will adhere to it. For Hemingway, his finest works typically involve elements such as action, violence, struggle, and men grappling with fate and life.
This novel, however, takes a more introspective and contemplative approach. I hate to be harsh, but it simply doesn't fall within Hemingway's area of expertise. When Hemingway is given a small group of men confronting death in a trench during wartime, he can produce brilliant writing. But when presented with an elderly man reflecting on his declining years in peacetime, he seems to fumble.
I have a great affection for Hemingway, yet this is not his best work.