Okay, I rarely give ratings to books that I couldn't manage to finish. However, once I reached a little over halfway through this particular one, I became certain that I just couldn't bring myself to complete it. The main character is truly such a misogynistic prick. He relocates from London to Paris for work, and right from the start, it seems as if the only thing he is concerned about is getting intimate with someone. The only aspects of this book that I derived any enjoyment from were those that described the act of walking around Paris. That's literally it - and the reason for that is because Paris is simply gorgeous. It's a shame that the rest of the book failed to capture my interest and was overshadowed by the unlikable nature of the main character.
A bit like Emily in Paris, but only in the most mean-spirited, dated (read: toxic masculine) way.
This description implies a comparison that is not flattering. It suggests that something or someone is attempting to imitate the charm and allure of the popular TV show Emily in Paris, but is doing so in a negative and unappealing manner.
The use of the terms "mean-spirited" and "dated" indicates a lack of authenticity and a certain backwardness. The addition of "toxic masculine" further emphasizes the negative connotations, perhaps suggesting that the imitation is being done in a way that is overly masculine and disrespectful.
Overall, this description paints a picture of something or someone that is trying too hard to be like Emily in Paris, but is falling short in a big way. It serves as a warning to others not to make the same mistakes and to strive for authenticity and respect in their own endeavors.