
Every writer dreams of creating a character that can capture the passion and interest of the reader. However, the protagonist of the current work never imagined that the passion of one of them would reach the point of obsession and madness, and that he would pay a high price for that obsession.
The story is wonderful and creative, perhaps one of the best works of Stephen King, which opened the door to his fame, especially with its adaptation into an innovative film that still maintains its place among the lists of the best films. The translation by Ahmed Khaled Tawfiq is good, but he omitted a lot of details, which made the work lose a lot of its charm. He even changed the name of the novel without a strong justification.
The best book I've read by Stephen King. A masterpiece! It disturbs me and I love it.
Most kidnappings in the world are carried out for money, to prostitute the victims, for revenge, or simply due to the criminal's psychopathy. Being kidnapped means living in an unworthy and deplorable condition, and it's something that shouldn't happen in any country in the world. But what if you found a book with this main theme, and instead of feeling compassion for the hostage, a strange sense of morbid curiosity ran through your mind to keep learning more and more atrocities committed by the antagonist of this story? Although it may seem crazy, it's not. That's exactly what I lived and felt after reading this wonderful work by Stephen King. It has such macabre scenes, but at the same time so extraordinary, that it's inevitable not to confuse evil with genius. I'm aware that what I'm about to write is imprudent, considering I still have many very distinguished works of this author to read, like It, The Shining, or the Dark Tower saga, but sincerely, considering the quality of this work, I would dare to say that I just read the best work of Stephen King. Amazing!
It all started a few months ago when I was trying to decide my next reading. My options were The Godfather by Mario Puzo, The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco, and precisely, The Shining by Stephen King. Three very famous novels, with a similar number of pages, which I observed carefully and hesitated because I felt a great anxiety to read those stories at that very moment, but I couldn't decide which one to read first. This is something that happens to me frequently, and that's why I try to premeditate my next readings in advance, but on that occasion, I forgot, my brain blocked, and the expected choice never appeared. That night, my courage was so affected by my indecision that I finally decided not to read anything at all. However, life and books always have beautiful surprises at the most unexpected moment. This is because that night when I was putting away those works, my eyes landed on Misery, and then minutes later, my worries disappeared, and all because without realizing it, I would start reading this story with great eagerness. Curiously, at this very moment when I'm writing this review, I remember that I still haven't read those works that I thought I would read first. That's how books are, that's the life of a reader.
It was a story that caught me from the beginning. In these first pages, it tells about the trance state that the protagonist of the story, Paul Sheldon, lives in after suffering a serious car accident. Paul feels that he is dying, and from his delicate state of health, he starts to describe in an incredible way exactly what he is seeing and feeling in those moments. From that preamble, the book completely won my attention because I discovered that this character that Stephen uses, who by the way is a writer, had a life of his own. And yes, I know, Stephen King is a genius at creating characters and making them seem real in all his stories, but this character is very different, it's unique. It's one thing for Stephen to tell you from the character the actions he takes and combine it with his conversations to harmonize his prose and not make it heavy, but it's a very different thing for the character to think for himself, imagine, deduce what is happening, draw his own conclusions, and also transmit in a gloomy way the pain, the suffering, the fear, the anguish, and the love for his work in an incredible way. Paul Sheldon is not a character with epic phrases to remember, but he is one who manages to perfectly interpret the role of a writer, helping the reader to understand all that an author has to strive for and live through to create just one work. As readers, we often ignore and forget that writing is not easy, therefore, books like this serve us to understand those people who dedicate hours, weeks, months, and years trying to create with logic and with a lot of imagination, a story that can please their readers. Yes, the book is horror, but even in the darkness there is light, in poverty there is kindness, and in a kidnapping story there is beauty because of the love for our paper friends.
But do you know what's the best part? That Paul Sheldon is not the most outstanding thing about this book. Although there is so much to highlight about this character, the best thing —without a doubt— is called Annie Wilkes. She is one of the best antagonists I've ever known in my life. She is a crazy, cruel, cold, bloodthirsty, and torturous woman, but despite everything —and as happens with many villains— her behavior and actions have a reason for being. Although it may seem crazy, in Annie's mind, killing is not synonymous with evil, it's helping others to be able to rest from the horrible world we live in. And you know what? Sometimes I can't deny that I sometimes agree with her. Still, it's not the same to kill for a moral code than to physically and mentally torture your captives; therefore, the best phrase that can describe Annie Wilkes is "That该死的狗疯了". I hope I never meet a person like her in my life, how scary it would be just to talk to someone like that!
Now, two excellent characters with such different thoughts, what do they have in common? That answer is called Misery. Misery is a female character from a series of books that Paul Sheldon creates and that are very popular all over the world. The problem is that Paul —like Arthur Conan Doyle with his very famous Sherlock Holmes— is tired of his character and can't stand writing more about her, so he has decided to end his most popular character. His dislike is because the works where Misery doesn't appear are not taken into account, and Paul wants to be recognized for something more than being the creator of that emblematic woman. But Paul has a much bigger problem, and that problem is that after his car accident, he appears in Annie Wilkes' house, who says she is his number one fan, precisely because of creating Misery. How will they get along? That's the interesting part of the book, to discover it. Maybe you can suspect it, but you have no idea the crazy things that happen in that house.
As for the prose, I also liked it very much. Here, Stephen uses short chapters —like in 22/11/63— so it's very attractive for the reader never to stop reading. An hour passes and you don't notice, two pass and you get excited, three pass and you lose control: It's crazy. In addition, writing a story with short chapters usually turns a book that could be dense into a light and very addictive one, so this story is read very quickly despite its 400 pages. Another interesting aspect of the prose are the sections where fragments of Paul Sheldon's novels are presented. These chapters are very special because there Stephen completely changes his literary style, and even those pages don't seem to be written by him, but by Paul Sheldon himself. Doing something like this is very difficult, but here, this author shows his true gift for writing. He is a true genius.
I must admit that in some chapters I thought the story was going from better to worse, and that the work had transformed from a horror book to a mystery one. But once I continued advancing, I understood that they were just transition pages because later, in the last third, everything becomes as impactful and terrifying as in previous chapters. Likewise, I also confess that in the first pages I didn't know if to think that Paul was a visionary, or if that was really his way of analyzing the situation. Initially, I thought that Paul's attitude would be a flaw, but later it became clear to me that it wasn't. These are small details that could be considered as "defects", but they are so insignificant that it's incredible that I haven't been able to find a major flaw in any aspect of this novel. Really, Stephen has done a job of another level, works like this are very difficult to equal or surpass.
Sometimes I think it's more difficult to give a neutral opinion, and without offending, about a book that I didn't like, but then, on occasions like this, I reflect and understand that it's not always the case. I loved this novel, but I suffered a lot, a lot trying to write about this spectacular book, and all because the mere mention of this story —or of any of the characters— makes me feel the need to start giving spoilers without control. Believe me, it's very difficult to control myself, trying to suppress words is a great torture; it's so difficult that two days after finishing reading it, I tried to recommend it to my brother, but without meaning to, I ended up telling him everything: I'm sorry dear brother. I know that Misery is a very famous movie from 1990 and that maybe many people know the story because of that film, but even so, there is no justification for spoiling those who for different reasons never saw the movie and know absolutely nothing about this novel. Therefore, for those people, I want to recommend that they don't watch the movie, not without first reading this book. In my case, I never saw the movie because when I was a child, in my home we only had one TV and we didn't usually watch horror movies for fear of having nightmares. But immediately when I finished this reading, I searched for the movie on the Internet, downloaded it, watched it, and although I can't deny that it's a great adaptation, sincerely it has no comparison with this book: The book is a thousand times better, it's that simple. The other recommendation is for those who have never read Stephen King but feel interested in doing so to get to know the "master of horror". I know that this author has many works, and面对这样一个庞大的目录, it's very difficult to choose which one to read, but if what you're looking for is a story that catches you, impacts you, and is easy and addictive to read, then this book is what you're looking for. You won't regret it, I promise you, you won't regret it for a single second.
I finish completely satisfied, I will reread it无数times in the future, and naturally, I will continue reading many of Stephen King's works. I know that very probably none of his works will make me feel what I've lived with this reading, but there's still a long way to explore, and I know that I'm going to enjoy his other works. Highly recommended book.
The number one fan
The number one fear
The number one crazy person
The number one hell
The number one tortured
The number one lady
Yes, I was a lot of things
I am the character that every writer fears
I am the character that every writer must read before writing any novel
Beware of the number one fan
Beware if you decide to write a series and in a moment of anger or boredom you kill the main character and end the series
Beware, perhaps you will have an accident and find me
At that time..
Most of your imagination will be a comedy film compared to what I can do
A list of things this book was:
- Disgusting. The content was truly revolting and made it hard to stomach at times.
- Disturbing. It had elements that really messed with my mind and left me feeling uneasy.
- Surprisingly a quick read. Despite its flaws, I found myself breezing through the pages.
- Really fond of using sexual assault as a metaphor. This was not only inappropriate but also quite concerning.
- Harmfully stereotypical in terms of race. The references and setting related to Africa were extremely one-sided and inaccurate.
- Harmfully stereotypical in terms of gender. The constant portrayal of the man going to work and the woman staying home was outdated and offensive.
- Honestly just pretty hateful toward women. There were several instances where women were depicted in a negative light.
- All for using the n word without blinking, apparently. This was completely unacceptable and showed a lack of respect for others.
A list of things this book was not:
- Scary. I was expecting to be scared out of my wits, but it just didn't have that effect on me.
- All that great of a read for me. Overall, I was quite disappointed with the book.
Bottom line: I guess I get the Stephen King appeal. But, uh. NOT A FAN.
Note from future me: If you're a Stephen King fan and you feel like writing at length in the comments of this about why I'm wrong and you're a Correct Intellectual, consider, instead, writing me a letter and then throwing that letter right in the garbage (either way, I'm not going to read it).
-----------
PRE-REVIEW
Okay, Stephen King. Time to show me what all the fuss is about.
(In other words: this is my first Stephen King book and I'm ready to scream in fear.)