...
Show More
The Atonement is the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It is the good news. It is the reason why Christ is the most vital subject in the world. That being said, Callister's book is not the Atonement. I have read a lot of Goodreads reviews for this book. This is a much beloved book. So much so that if a person of good faith, in good faith, doesn't take to this book c=they seem to question their own spirituality. Unfortunately others do as well.
The problem with this book is the adjectives. We should speak highly and sacredly of the Atonement. But there seems to be a historic strain in Mormonism that goes overboard on superlatives. These can interrupt the flow of the work. Add an overabundance of superlatives with the idea that repetition is always merited, and you get a difficult read.
With a work like this I don't think difficulty helps. It is not more work that makes a reading virtuous. It is clarity and spiritual power that the author should seek. I realize that this was too big of a task for Callister to take on. And that's no knock on Callister. The Atonement will always be too big to understand in this life alone. But obviously the reverence was there in Callister's approach. And I think this is why he writes the way he does.
In the end it may be worth it to pick it up again. But it may just be more worthwhile to write my own book about the Atonement. That being said, don't question your spirituality if you have to put the book down. Callister didn't author the Infinite Atonement. Christ did. Callister is not the source for the Atonement. Christ is. So please don't questions a person's loyalty to Christ when they critique this book. It means you have forgotten the lessons of the Infinite Atonement in the first place.
The problem with this book is the adjectives. We should speak highly and sacredly of the Atonement. But there seems to be a historic strain in Mormonism that goes overboard on superlatives. These can interrupt the flow of the work. Add an overabundance of superlatives with the idea that repetition is always merited, and you get a difficult read.
With a work like this I don't think difficulty helps. It is not more work that makes a reading virtuous. It is clarity and spiritual power that the author should seek. I realize that this was too big of a task for Callister to take on. And that's no knock on Callister. The Atonement will always be too big to understand in this life alone. But obviously the reverence was there in Callister's approach. And I think this is why he writes the way he does.
In the end it may be worth it to pick it up again. But it may just be more worthwhile to write my own book about the Atonement. That being said, don't question your spirituality if you have to put the book down. Callister didn't author the Infinite Atonement. Christ did. Callister is not the source for the Atonement. Christ is. So please don't questions a person's loyalty to Christ when they critique this book. It means you have forgotten the lessons of the Infinite Atonement in the first place.