...
Show More
Daily Vonnegut – Day 7.
n “To be is to do” – Socrates
“To do is to be” – Jean-Paul Sartre
“Do be do be do” – Frank Sinatran
Rudy Waltz, a mostly autobiographical figure from Vonnegut. He does us the favour of “explaining” the symbols in the book in the preface. A bizarre tale with his father, Otto Waltz, who was Hitler’s friend back in art school and who paraded the Nazi flag in their living room. A tale of caution with gun control. But also a deeply moving plea in there, one that calls for attempting to understand your relationship with your parents and your family. Perhaps this last point is cheating, as I looked up a Vonnegut interview and looked at his face as he was talking. I read about his mother and her death by suicide. I felt my heart ache and I wanted to reach out and give him a hug. After the interview, I came back and continued reading. A lot of folks are all about removing the human element and separating the art from the artist, which is completely fair. But look here: separating the art from the artist in this case makes Vonnegut’s books a massive exercise in allegory, sarcastic and ironic and somewhat bitter, but ultimately optimistic about human nature. I am not a huge fan of the entirety of a novel being used as a vehicle for delivering a single message, so I read the book and see its point and either agree or disagree, but I want more. When I add the human element here, and god did Vonnegut seem to be a lovely human, it changes everything. It shouldn’t… but it does.
n “To be is to do” – Socrates
“To do is to be” – Jean-Paul Sartre
“Do be do be do” – Frank Sinatran
Rudy Waltz, a mostly autobiographical figure from Vonnegut. He does us the favour of “explaining” the symbols in the book in the preface. A bizarre tale with his father, Otto Waltz, who was Hitler’s friend back in art school and who paraded the Nazi flag in their living room. A tale of caution with gun control. But also a deeply moving plea in there, one that calls for attempting to understand your relationship with your parents and your family. Perhaps this last point is cheating, as I looked up a Vonnegut interview and looked at his face as he was talking. I read about his mother and her death by suicide. I felt my heart ache and I wanted to reach out and give him a hug. After the interview, I came back and continued reading. A lot of folks are all about removing the human element and separating the art from the artist, which is completely fair. But look here: separating the art from the artist in this case makes Vonnegut’s books a massive exercise in allegory, sarcastic and ironic and somewhat bitter, but ultimately optimistic about human nature. I am not a huge fan of the entirety of a novel being used as a vehicle for delivering a single message, so I read the book and see its point and either agree or disagree, but I want more. When I add the human element here, and god did Vonnegut seem to be a lovely human, it changes everything. It shouldn’t… but it does.