Community Reviews

Rating(3.9 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
29(29%)
4 stars
36(36%)
3 stars
34(34%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews
April 26,2025
... Show More
"Talvez seja verdade que tudo pode mudar num dia. Que umas escassas dúzias de horas podem afectar o curso de toda uma vida. E que, quando assim acontece, essas poucas dúzias de horas, como os despojos de uma casa queimada, o relógio carbonizado, a fotografia chamuscada, a mobília ardida, têm de ser ressuscitadas das ruínas e examinadas. Conservadas. Explicadas.
Pequenos acontecimentos, coisas vulgares, destruídas e reconstituídas. Investidas de novo significado. Subitamente tornam-se nos ossos descorados de uma história."

O Deus das Pequenas Coisas tem tanto de belo quanto de perturbador. Mas talvez perturbador não seja a palavra certa e essa seja injusto, ou perverso, ou só humano.
Todas as narrativas que abordam as diferenças de género (e já agora as de classe também, como aqui) tendem a ser duras e a espelhar a sordidez em que assentam as sociedades humanas - mas a beleza deste livro, de cujo narrador/a, muito jovem, transparece um discurso inocente, com uma cadência ao estilo da fábula, eleva a dureza das ações retratadas a outro nível.

Para Estha e Rahel, a vida, estratificada, compartimentada, regrada é uma realidade de onde se escapam apenas através da rebelião da imaginação (e um ou outro passinho mais ousado que se permite às crianças). Até que, num único dia, todas as barreiras conhecidas se estilhaçam, bocadinho a bocadinho, num crescendo de iniquidade e malvadeza.

No fundo da sua história jaz o desejo de amar e ser amado; todos os personagens dentro da narrativa ambicionam, de uma ou de outra forma, amor: amor de mãe, de filho, de amante, de camarada... Amores proibidos numa sociedade em que a hereditariedade de castas dita quem deve ser amado e de que forma. Tudo correrá bem desde que ninguém ouse espreitar para lá da cerca, cobiçar o que lhe é proibido.
Infelizmente, é exatamente isso que acontece, aos gémeos e a sua mãe, nesta história: ousam amar um Intocável - a designação diz tudo, dentro de um sistema de classes, os Intocáveis não são homens, não são mulheres, não são ninguém, não são nada.

"Mammachi contou a Estha e a Rahel que, na sua meninice, os Paravás se retiravam rastejando às arrecuas com uma vassoura, varrendo as suas pegadas de modo a que nenhum brâmane ou cristão sírio se conspurcasse ao pisar acidentalmente uma pegada de Paravi. No tempo de Mammachi, os Paravás, como os demais Intocáveis, estavam proibidos de circular nas estradas públicas, proibidos de cobrir a parte superior do corpo, proibidos de usar guarda-chuva. Tinham de tapar a boca com as mãos quando falavam, afastando o seu hálito poluído daqueles daqueles a quem se dirigiam."

Por isso, amar (O Deus das) Pequenas Coisas, com todas as forças do ser, terá um preço muito alto para esta família.

"O homem à sombra das árvores de borracha com moedas de sol dançando-lhe no corpo, segurando a sua filha nos braços, ergueu os olhos e encontrou o olhar de Ammu. Séculos confluíram num momento evanescente. A história não estava em sentido e foi apanhada desprevenida."

A história podia até estar desprevenida, mas quando vier reclamar o seu preço, as consequências serão devastadoras:

"Os gémeos eram demasiado novos para saberem que [os polícias] eram apenas os escudeiros da História. Enviados para acertarem as contas e cobrarem as multas daqueles que não cumpriam as leis. Impelidos por sentimentos primordiais e, paradoxalmente, totalmente impessoais. Sentimentos de despeito nascidos de um medo incipiente e inconsciente - o medo que a civilização tem da natureza, os homens das mulheres, o poder da impotência.
O impulso subliminal do homem para destruir tudo aquilo que não consegue subjugar ou deificar.
Necessidades de Homens. Aquilo que Esthappen e Rahel testemunharam naquela manhã, embora ainda não o soubessem, foi uma demonstração clínica em condições controladas (afinal de contas, não era uma guerra ou um genocídio) da ânsia humana de poder. Estrutura. Ordem. Monopólio total. Era a história humana, mascarada de Desígnio Divino, revelando -se a um público menor de Idade."

O Deus das Pequenas Coisas é por isso uma narrativa de pequenos nadas, pequeninos pedaços de quotidiano, pequeninos receios, pequeninas observações, pequeninas alegrias, pequeninas aventuras. O foco central são os gémeos biovulares, Estha e Rahel, mas o seu tema é muito abrangente - assente na visão despojada destas duas crianças, traça a história de uma Índia dividida cultural e politicamente - um país de desigualdades, uma cultura que não respeita os estratos mais baixos nem as mulheres; onde as fronteiras e as interdições são muito claras e ultrapassar os limites definidos tem consequências que não se podem prever.
O seu ritmo, longe de ser frenético, envolve o leitor numa narrativa suave, inocente, previsível (no sentido em que não lhe oculta que as dificuldades irão surgir); com repetidas referências (muitas vezes reveladas na escrita do/a narrador/a) à descoberta do mundo e à aprendizagem, ao despertar do medo, da consciência da finitude da vida, e das consequências da quebra das regras estabelecidas.

O Deus das Pequenas Coisas é um livro fruto da maturidade emocional, brutal e brilhante, onde se revela um domínio de escrita indiscutível, e onde a capacidade de criar ambientes é irrepreensível. Exige concentração e tempo por parte do leitor, é verdade, mas devolve uma experiência única e necessária. Atua como uma espécie de manifesto, ou, vá, como uma denúncia da perversidade dos homens para com os homens, e, sobretudo, da hereditariedade dessa perversidade.
Um livro espantoso.

"(...)o segredo das Grandes Histórias é elas não terem segredo nenhum. As Grandes Histórias são aquelas que já ouvimos e queremos voltar a ouvir. Aquelas onde podemos entrar e morar confortavelmente. Que não nos enganam com calafrios e finais acrobáticos. Que não nos surpreendem com o imprevisto. Que são tão familiares como a casa unde moramos. Ou o cheiro da pele de um amante. Sabemos como acabam, porém ouvimo-las como se não soubéssemos. Tal como, embora sabendo que um dia havemos de morrer, vivemos como se não o soubéssemos. Nas Grandes Histórias sabemos quem vive, quem morre, quem encontra o amor e quem são encontra. E, contudo, queremos saber de novo.
É esse o seu mistério e a sua magia."
April 26,2025
... Show More
“As she leaned against the door in the darkness, [Ammu] felt her dream, her Afternoon-mare, move inside her like a rib of water rising from the ocean, gathering into a wave. The cheerful one-armed man with salty skin and a shoulder that ended abruptly like a cliff emerged from the shadows of the jagged beach and walked towards her.

Who was he?

Who could he have been?

The God of Loss.

The God of Small Things.

The God of Goosebumps and Sudden Smiles.

He could do only one thing at a time.

If he touched her, he couldn’t talk to her, if he loved her he couldn’t leave, if he spoke he couldn’t listen, if he fought he couldn’t win…”

-tArundhati Roy, The God of Small Things

Over the years, the lofty reputations of literature’s great novels can work against them. By the time you get to certain classics, there is almost no way they can live up to the hype that precedes them. But that is not the case with Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The controversial Booker Prize winner has talons as sharp as the day it came off the printing presses in 1997. It is brutal and beautiful, challenging and discomforting, a book of precise insights, moral force, and emotional impact.

***

The God of Small Things is difficult to summarize without overexplaining or spoiling its revelations. Suffice to say, Roy’s novel revolves around two tragic incidents that occur to two different children. Both of these moments are given to the reader up front, with the narrative itself only gradually circling back to them.

This technique works quite effectively. As Alfred Hitchcock used to explain, there is a fine distinction between surprise and suspense, and Roy understands it well. Though she tells you what’s coming down the road, she builds an enormous amount of tension is showing exactly how those distant points are reached. Roy executes so well that even her non-surprises are shocking.

***

The most important thing to know in approaching The God of Small Things is its structure, which can be a bit of a challenge. The story takes place in two different timelines. The first – and main – timeline is in 1969, where the important stuff happens. The second is in 1993, where the characters are still reeling, nearly a quarter century later.

Additionally, the 1969 story-thread is nonlinear, with both forwards and backwards temporal leaps. While Roy is not deliberately trying to confuse things – all these fractured pieces eventually fall into place in meaningful ways – you have to pay careful attention to the transitions. It took me a minute, but once I understood what to look for – once I knew where the plot was headed – everything made a lot more sense. I say this because The God of Small Things has a bit of a learning curve imbedded within it.

***

Our main characters are Rahel (a girl) and Esthappen (a boy), who are seven-year-old fraternal twins in 1969. They live in the village of Ayemenem in southwestern India, cared for by their single mother, Ammu, who has found herself cornered by life since she divorced her husband.

Ammu’s family owns a pickling factory, the control of which has been seized by Rahel and Esthappen’s Oxford-educated Uncle Chako. He was once married to an Englishwoman named Margaret, with whom he had a daughter, Sophie. The precipitating event in The God of Small Things is the visit of Margaret and Sophie to Ayemenem.

Roy’s handling of these people – and many more – is simply astounding. Everyone who walks across the stage gets their due. More than that, everyone is given dimension. There are some nasty folks in these pages, but all of that nastiness is earned. For example, Rahel and Esthappen have a hateful great-aunt known as Baby Kochamma. A thoroughgoing heel, she is also surprisingly sympathetic, given a fully-formed – and engrossing – backstory that explains how she came to be what she is, and how she came to do what she does. Even the archetypal police inspector, an officious jerk with just a passing role, is allowed a hint of shading as the cog of a machine.

To encompass this small universe, Roy employs an omniscient third-person perspective, in which she delves into the lives and innermost thoughts of just about everyone who appears on the page. By shifting perspectives at just the right time, though, she still manages to hold back several bombshells until late in the final act.

***

The prose is something else. It is lyrical and lush and evocative. Roy uses the lost art of the simile to marvelous effect, and has the ability to describe things with such tactility that to read this book is to feel like you’ve seen a movie. From an airy church to a dingy airport, from a dusty road to a gaudy movie house, Roy creates incredibly detailed sets for her dramatic moments, making them an integral part of her scenes.

Roy pulls no punches in her writing, however, and this caused something of a backlash upon publication, and ever since. In particular, there is an unsparing depiction of a sexual assault in which she refuses to look away. The hideousness, the queasiness, are obviously the point – I did not sense any cheap, attention-seeking gratuity – and she lands the blows, but it’s also hard to read. Beyond that, there is a rawness and frankness to The God of Small Things that can be startling.

***

The God of Small Things is bursting with motifs, and Roy sets them out boldly. Some derive from the particulars of India, especially caste segregation dividing Touchables from Untouchables. Others, such as misogyny, betrayal, manipulation, and thwarted love, are universal.

In a lesser novel, this sort of thematic underlining could be pedantic, even trite. But the power of Roy’s writing, the vividness of her thorny, conflicted characters, and the intensity of the book’s climactic incidents give meaning to otherwise well-worn sentiments. Ammu, Rahel, and Esthappen are hopelessly stuck in the slipstream of history and society, unable to control the larger things, and left to cling to those brief handholds of joy. Death is the cost of life, and the riddle that animates The God of Small Things is figuring out how to make that steep price worth paying.
April 26,2025
... Show More
3.5
I usually love books that are set in the Indian subcontinent but found this one frustrating to be honest.
On the one hand it was a tour de force of sumptuous prose, but on the other I found that the narrative meandered all over the place, making it difficult to for me (with my grasshopper brain) to keep up.
Although Roy's writing is kissed by the gods, I'm a great believer in a story's need to flow and my early enthusiasm became steadily dampened as the book progressed.
April 26,2025
... Show More
This has kinda fucked me up. Gorgeous. Beautiful. But, devastating.
April 26,2025
... Show More
I'm drowning in feelings. Pappachi's moth is on my heart. Review to come.
April 26,2025
... Show More
I remember trying to read this book half a dozen times. I knew I had added this book and that it had disappeared from my shelves so I re-added it 11 May. Well now I find in Dropbox. I exported my books June 1th 2014 and this is the file and the book is on it. So how did it disappear?

I've never had proof before that I really had added a book that GR removed. I've had them tell me I must have removed it in error, but so many? Of course not. Besides I don't remove books from the bookshelves but only from the review page (this one) so it would be extremely unlikely to be in error. Everyone else liked it, so I thought I must get through it, but I never could. I loathed the characters and didn't want to read about them so although I would regularly make it to about 100 pages, more than that I couldn't do. Maybe I should have perservered, but life is too short and there are too many 5 star books to discover out there. What is the expression, ars longa, vita brevia?
April 26,2025
... Show More
It didn’t matter that the story had begun, because kathakali discovered long ago that the secret of the Great Stories is that they have no secrets. The Great Stories are the ones you have heard and want to hear again. The ones you can enter anywhere and inhabit comfortably. They don’t deceive you with thrills and trick endings. They don’t surprise you with the unforeseen. They are as familiar as the house you live in. Or the smell of your lover’s skin. You know how they end, yet you listen as though you don’t. In the way that although you know that one day you will die, you live as though you won’t. In the Great Stories you know who lives, who dies, who finds love, who doesn’t. And yet you want to know again.

That is their mystery and their magic.

Seven years ago, I bought the Pop Chart 100 Essential Novels Scratch-off Chart. At the time, I had read 11 of the 100 books. Since then, I’ve read 53 more (and counting). For the most part, hanging the chart in my library has served to inspire me to read books I’ve long heard of but had never found the motivation to read. And while a few have been disappointing (and a couple downright awful), some have become new favorite books of mine:  Slaughterhouse-Five,  The Bridge of San Luis Rey,  Infinite Jest,  Don Quixote,  The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao. The God of Small Things is, thankfully, in that latter group.

The God of Small Things is not an easy or a happy read. The story is constantly shifting between past and present. Until the final pages, the story dances around the tragedy at its center, a sequence of events that left two people dead and a family irrevocably changed. And the subject—the caste system in 1960s India, and specifically the Love Laws in place at the time—feels senseless and causes much suffering. But the writing is wonderful, with great characterization of at least a dozen characters. The story builds with exquisite precision based upon believable choices by these characters. It’s the kind of story you don’t want to see but also can’t look away from. A must read. Highly recommended.
April 26,2025
... Show More
What does it say about me that I get sort of happy to find an imposter in the canon? I feel like the gestapo, that terrifyingly powerful... like I'm finally undoing or deciphering the spell that this work invokes upon the general (albeit intelligent reading) audience. Others could have easily taken its place on that memorable list... & why oh why would lauded "Tropic of Cancer" or "Mao II" possibly be considered classics, too?

& here is another. An award winning "masterpiece" held high on the literati's bookshelf. The plot is delicate--solid, actually. Call this "The Sound and the Fury 2.0." Taking on the stream of collective consciousness technique, flowing freely through time, exploring psyches and associations... all that here, in a more digestible helping. Faulkner's infamous prose confusion is not a specter here, thank god.

But...

It's hard to say this, to just out-and-mention this: THE GOD OF SMALL THINGS is unbelievably pretentious. Capital P--pretentious. Taking strands of quasi intelligent statements and repeating them throughout the twisty plot, again with a furious intensity, as loud as a cascade... all this brings the focus upon the writing itself ("Masterful!"), but not the plot.

&...

What?!?! Incest?!?! (Last time I checked, this was the most risque thing in .... Flowers in the Attic!) Even that aside, there are still many things askew with the novel. It is semi-tolerable to read, the writer is just too clever to be confined to the parameters of her story--and therefore the case here is that of the writer selling out, making the plot itself (which I wont tire to say--ain't half bad [at least, the family curse plot is richer, more dramatic and heartfelt, than that of the Southern clan of Faulkner's classic]) take a backseat to annoying "writerly" acrobatics. The ending is great, but it too, unfortunately, feels entirely contrived.

HAHA, I got YOU...! ...! And you know what, itty book? You really ain't all that!
April 26,2025
... Show More
Another example of a critically acclaimed book I did not like very much. It may be because I am from Kerala, and most of the "exotic" landscape was humdrum for me. Also, I thought that Ms. Roy's treatment of Kerala history was not wholly factual.
April 26,2025
... Show More
It is 1969 and India although having achieved independence twenty years earlier is still mired in its caste system. In this light, Arundhati Roy brings us her masterful first novel The G-D of Small Things which won the Man Booker Prize in 1997. A powerful novel filled with luscious prose and a heart rending story, Roy reveals to her readers an India hanging onto to the traditions of the past with a slight glimpse of her future.

Ammukutty Kochamma, the daughter of a respected entomologist and classical violin player, desired an education rather than an arranged marriage. Her family belonged to the Touchable caste and, while tolerable of others, desired that their daughter married someone from a family like theirs. Ammu met a Bengali and married for love. He turned out to be an alcoholic and they divorced within two years, although not before giving birth to fraternal twins Estahappen (Esta) a boy and Rahel a girl. Ammu retreats with her children to the family estate, doomed to live a miserable life as an outcast.

Even though Ammu raises Esta and Rahel to be brilliant children, the rest of the family resents their presence at the home in Ayemenem. Her father has died and her mother, although a presence, is blind. The new head of the family is her brother Chacko, a former Rhodes Scholar and current member of the communist party. Although he attempts to be a father to the twins, his pseudo-love pines for his biological daughter Sophie Mol who lives in England. While Chacko tolerates the family, Ammu's aunt Baby Kochamma spews nothing but venom at Ammu and her children for the rest of her life. Failed at both becoming a nun and winning over her true love in life, Baby Kochamma desires nothing more than to make all those around her miserable, but especially her divorced niece Ammu and two bastard children.

Roy merited the Booker prize for her story alone as it featured forbidden love within the caste system and memorable, multi-layered characters. Yet, what most likely won Roy this award was her masterful prose, which, when combined with her tale, results in an instant classic. Switching from current time to flashbacks, speaking backwards in twin language, and detailed descriptions of Indian life are only a few of the facets contributing to this tale. Adding to the prose the tragic tale of twins separated, a woman denied love because he belongs to another untouchable caste, and other characters pining for a life that might have been, Roy has woven together a true gem.

Recently I joined the year of reading women of color challenge, which lead me to read novels by female authors around the globe who I would not have considered otherwise. Arundhati Roy is a gifted storyteller and film writer, whose work should not be missed. Her second novel The Ministry of Upmost Happiness is due out in July 2017. If it is nearly as masterful as The G-D of Small Things, it is a novel that should not be missed. A luscious, complex novel worthy of its awards, The G-D of Small Things merits 5 sparkling stars.
April 26,2025
... Show More
A remarkable book; and it won the Booker! When I sat down on finishing it to think about the themes I realised how much ground Roy had covered and in such a beautifully written way. The themes include the caste system, religious tensions, communism, forbidden love, history and colonialism, class, culture, to name but a few. It is a family saga told in the third person and is not really sequential; the plot in outline is known from fairly early in the book.
The plot revolves around twins Rahel and Esthappen, but is seen mainly from Rahel’s point of view. Other family players include their mother Ammu, their uncle Chacko, great aunt Baby Kochamma; Chacko’s daughter Sophie Mol is much heralded during the book and pivotal, but only plays a small part. Other important characters include Velutha, an untouchable who works at the family pickle factory.
Roy’s characters bend and break rules, they cross boundaries (“boundaries blur as tapioca fences take root and bloom”), they transgress. Although this is set in Kerala in South India away from Partition affected areas, separation and demarcation are still are still significant. Recently I’ve read Heart of Darkness and I was hoping I’d seen the last of HoD references for some time; but no. Roy employs them is quite a significant way. Kari Saipu, the Englishman who “went native” is a Kurtz type, explicitly so, but Chacko (who is an Anglophile) also plays a similar role. This is especially the case when he says in reference to the family business “My factory, my pineapples, my pickles” (contrast with Kurtz, “My intended, my ivory, my station”). The setting Ayemenem, becomes a sort of heart of darkness for several characters. The divisional lines between east and west and between masculine and feminine are clear. Chacko is able to do what Ammu cannot in terms of intimate relationships. In life and in death Ammu is persistently penalised and persecuted by tradition, culture, by male chauvinism, by denial of education, in life and in death.
The narrative is grim and tragic, but Roy writes with great style and even humour about profound and important themes. The book doesn’t need me to promote it, but if you haven’t read it; please do.
April 26,2025
... Show More
Fiction at its best:
--Having read more than a thousand pages of Roy’s nonfiction (i.e. My Seditious Heart: Collected Nonfiction), I figured it was about time I set aside my prioritization of critical nonfiction and explore the fiction that first brought her into prominence.
...After all, Roy has said that she loves writing fiction, whereas nonfiction is forced out of her as “urgent interventions”. [Emphases added]:
Much of my non-fiction writing is an argument, but fiction is where you create a universe through which you invite a reader to walk. It is much more complex. For me, it is the most satisfying thing. When I write fiction, I feel like I am using all my skills, it delights me the most. […]

It is only fiction that transcends what is increasingly being divided into subjects. Fiction is the connective tissue between so many things which are sometimes looked at or studied in isolation. It allows you not to isolate things.
--I wish I was a more patient fiction reader, as I did slip-and-slide on the intricate storyline. Regardless, I was still consumed by the world of structural rot and human fragility that Roy conjures.
--Favorite quotes:
If you’re happy in a dream, does that count?

[…] were too young to know that these were only history’s henchmen. Sent to square the books and collect the dues from those who broke its laws. Impelled by feelings that were primal yet paradoxically wholly impersonal. Feelings of contempt born of inchoate, unacknowledged fear—civilization’s fear of nature, men’s fear of women, power’s fear of powerlessness. Man’s subliminal urge to destroy what he could neither subdue nor deify.

In Defense of Critical, Creative Nonfiction:
--Roy [emphasis added]:
Only a novel can tell you how caste, communalisation, sexism, love, music, poetry, the rise of the right all combine in a society. And the depths in which they combine. We have been trained to “silo-ise”: our brains specialise in one thing. But the radical understanding is if you can understand it all, and I think only a novel can.
--I find that the siloed nonfiction Roy alludes to is the combination of:
i) The history of science dictated by colonialism/capitalism, seeking to deconstruct (“categorize”/“dissect”/“atomize”, Roy's “silo-ise”) in order to rule (Roy's Man’s “subliminal urge to destroy what he could neither subdue nor deify”), which I contrast with radical science/social science in reviewing The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture.
ii) Bourgeoise academia's technical textbook-styled writings that emerges from this, as user manuals for status quo administration by the “professional managerial class”. These indeed suffocate creative (potentially rebellious) thinking.
...Thus, radical nonfiction is grotesquely under-read. We live in a world system where the structures of capital flow dictate so much of the standard-of-living and prospects of each and every community. The spillover effects are difficult to exaggerate. And yet, many of the readers of vivid fictional character analyses are frankly oblivious to this kind of systems-thinking (Thinking in Systems: A Primer).
...Long-term power hides comfortably in abstraction. This is why I focus on systems-level critical nonfiction, and the need to make these accessible. You will look at social crises such as financial/environmental/military in a completely different level of analysis. If you can pair this with a creative writer (social imagination!), the potential is endless.

...So, if you find Roy’s nonfiction essay Capitalism: A Ghost Story compelling, you will be blown away by these:
-Talking to My Daughter About the Economy: or, How Capitalism Works—and How It Fails
-Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World
-Debt: The First 5,000 Years (RIP David Graeber)
-(less on mapping the capitalist system and more on social imagination for alternatives) Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.