...
Show More
I have never done a review on GoodReads before, but I believe this book merits it...
This is the worst book I have ever read. I'm not just saying that because I disagree with the themes that this story was based on; it was written badly. It was 3rd grade-level bad. It reminded me that any book in the Goosebumps series would be a welcoming divergence, and I'm not exaggerating. Whenever a story has magic or supernatural forces, it needs to have rules so that there is clarity in what is happening throughout it. This book kept changing rules on the reader so frequently and in a less-than-surprising way, that any inconsistencies in supernatural thematic elements couldn't be overlooked because so much came at the reader from out of the blue.
Further negative points:
This 'Tin Man' killer's 3 rules that this book is supposedly based on is really 1 and 1/2 rules. The first rule is "God came to my house and I killed him." That isn't a rule, but a statement that is never brought up later at any point. Also the 3rd rule is merely an amendment to a certain condition of the second rule.
The 'heroes' of this book are told to kill each other by this Tin Man, so what do they do? Discuss killing or not killing each other, rather than discussing the idea of killing this Tin Man. It was like these 4 people tended to do as they were told from the beginning of the book.
Does anyone remember when Stephanie, Jack, Leslie and Randy are talking about Betty, Stewart and Pete existing as inbreeds? I do. I remember a couple offhand remarks during their discussions of their uneasiness with that family. I also remember that it wasn't actually known if they did inbreed, but the author seemed to take his characters' word for it. Like the author fooled himself into believing gossip that he wrote. That REALLY drove me crazy, like I was listening to a drunk friend lie to me.
Gypsies or Roma don't draw pentagrams all over the walls.
The Gypsy mirror was a useless prop. It didn't do anything, other than to exist to be weird. That was really superficial, and it irritated me that everyone seemed to know that mirrors like this are trick mirrors from Gypsy circuses like it is common knowledge. Peretti (or Decker I guess?) really drug Gypsies (Roma) through the mud. I call racism.
This is a short list of tiny tidbits of things I have learned by reading this book:
1. Good people have good manners, and bad people have bad manners.
2. Women hate each other.
3. Women can't do anything on their own. They always need men. Men tend not to need help from women.
4. I don't care what happens to the main characters.
5. Women have feelings. Men know how to get things done.
This book was like watching Mystery Science Theater 3000 without the commentary, so you have to make up your own. It is worth reading for a laugh only when you're in a good mood. I would give more of a plot summary, but the again: what plot? Okay, here goes-->
Four people are stuck in a house that belongs to a family of three stereotypes that the author attempts to superficially convince the reader are bad people. And they are Gypsies. Alert the authorities. A killer named 'Tin Man' traps everyone in this house and we are told that this point in the book is a psychological game of wits, good versus evil, and women making mistakes. People run around, argue, fight, rules get changed back and forth for seemingly no reason other than to keep the story running until page 372, and also there is a vague girl named Susan who is decidedly good and saves the day by saying something along the lines of "listen to your heart, and be good." The two people that we are supposed to like come out alive, so it is a happy ending. We are also supposed to like this Susan character, but she sacrifices herself so that the plot doesn't completely conform to a Lifetime movie storyboard.
That's it. Don't read it. I would give it minus eight stars if I could, but the lowest is one.
This is the worst book I have ever read. I'm not just saying that because I disagree with the themes that this story was based on; it was written badly. It was 3rd grade-level bad. It reminded me that any book in the Goosebumps series would be a welcoming divergence, and I'm not exaggerating. Whenever a story has magic or supernatural forces, it needs to have rules so that there is clarity in what is happening throughout it. This book kept changing rules on the reader so frequently and in a less-than-surprising way, that any inconsistencies in supernatural thematic elements couldn't be overlooked because so much came at the reader from out of the blue.
Further negative points:
This 'Tin Man' killer's 3 rules that this book is supposedly based on is really 1 and 1/2 rules. The first rule is "God came to my house and I killed him." That isn't a rule, but a statement that is never brought up later at any point. Also the 3rd rule is merely an amendment to a certain condition of the second rule.
The 'heroes' of this book are told to kill each other by this Tin Man, so what do they do? Discuss killing or not killing each other, rather than discussing the idea of killing this Tin Man. It was like these 4 people tended to do as they were told from the beginning of the book.
Does anyone remember when Stephanie, Jack, Leslie and Randy are talking about Betty, Stewart and Pete existing as inbreeds? I do. I remember a couple offhand remarks during their discussions of their uneasiness with that family. I also remember that it wasn't actually known if they did inbreed, but the author seemed to take his characters' word for it. Like the author fooled himself into believing gossip that he wrote. That REALLY drove me crazy, like I was listening to a drunk friend lie to me.
Gypsies or Roma don't draw pentagrams all over the walls.
The Gypsy mirror was a useless prop. It didn't do anything, other than to exist to be weird. That was really superficial, and it irritated me that everyone seemed to know that mirrors like this are trick mirrors from Gypsy circuses like it is common knowledge. Peretti (or Decker I guess?) really drug Gypsies (Roma) through the mud. I call racism.
This is a short list of tiny tidbits of things I have learned by reading this book:
1. Good people have good manners, and bad people have bad manners.
2. Women hate each other.
3. Women can't do anything on their own. They always need men. Men tend not to need help from women.
4. I don't care what happens to the main characters.
5. Women have feelings. Men know how to get things done.
This book was like watching Mystery Science Theater 3000 without the commentary, so you have to make up your own. It is worth reading for a laugh only when you're in a good mood. I would give more of a plot summary, but the again: what plot? Okay, here goes-->
Four people are stuck in a house that belongs to a family of three stereotypes that the author attempts to superficially convince the reader are bad people. And they are Gypsies. Alert the authorities. A killer named 'Tin Man' traps everyone in this house and we are told that this point in the book is a psychological game of wits, good versus evil, and women making mistakes. People run around, argue, fight, rules get changed back and forth for seemingly no reason other than to keep the story running until page 372, and also there is a vague girl named Susan who is decidedly good and saves the day by saying something along the lines of "listen to your heart, and be good." The two people that we are supposed to like come out alive, so it is a happy ending. We are also supposed to like this Susan character, but she sacrifices herself so that the plot doesn't completely conform to a Lifetime movie storyboard.
That's it. Don't read it. I would give it minus eight stars if I could, but the lowest is one.