...
Show More
Nelson Mandela’s Long Walk to Freedom was a really good read. What stood out most to me was his early life—after his father passed away, he was adopted by a royal family who ensured he received a good education and guided him through the cultural rites of passage into manhood. Despite all they did for him, Mandela had the courage to run away rather than submit to an arranged marriage. That boldness set the tone for the rest of his life.
At university, he took a stand against what he believed was an unfair student election process, even resigning from his leadership role and having to drop out—all because of principle. He also worked relentlessly, day in and day out, committed to the struggle.
One of the most striking ideas in the book was Mandela’s reflection on personal change. He talks about the importance of looking back at the “rivers you have crossed” to understand how far you’ve come. For me, crossing the Indian Ocean and starting a new life has brought so much growth, and reading Mandela’s journey made me pause and reflect on my own.
One part that really challenged me was how he ultimately moved away from non-violent protest, believing it was no longer effective. The book explores the complexity of his decisions—including his early resistance to interracial cooperation, his eventual embrace of sabotage, and the immense personal cost of his activism. He divorced his wife and lost much of his personal life to the cause, including the chance to watch his children grow up. His time in prison was marked by harsh and unfair conditions. He writes about the heartbreak of missing his children growing up—recalling how years, sometimes decades would pass between visits.
In the end of the book it talks about how he chose to work with the very people who had oppressed him. That willingness to compromise for the sake of peace was something I found powerful. It made me wonder—could reconciliation have been possible earlier, or was suffering the only path to freedom?
At university, he took a stand against what he believed was an unfair student election process, even resigning from his leadership role and having to drop out—all because of principle. He also worked relentlessly, day in and day out, committed to the struggle.
One of the most striking ideas in the book was Mandela’s reflection on personal change. He talks about the importance of looking back at the “rivers you have crossed” to understand how far you’ve come. For me, crossing the Indian Ocean and starting a new life has brought so much growth, and reading Mandela’s journey made me pause and reflect on my own.
One part that really challenged me was how he ultimately moved away from non-violent protest, believing it was no longer effective. The book explores the complexity of his decisions—including his early resistance to interracial cooperation, his eventual embrace of sabotage, and the immense personal cost of his activism. He divorced his wife and lost much of his personal life to the cause, including the chance to watch his children grow up. His time in prison was marked by harsh and unfair conditions. He writes about the heartbreak of missing his children growing up—recalling how years, sometimes decades would pass between visits.
In the end of the book it talks about how he chose to work with the very people who had oppressed him. That willingness to compromise for the sake of peace was something I found powerful. It made me wonder—could reconciliation have been possible earlier, or was suffering the only path to freedom?