...
Show More
I was unsure how to rate this. It's not a perfect book by any means. The main reason I'm giving it 5 stars is that I'm a "The Little Prince" tragic and this book gave me a special insight to "The Little Prince" and made me think about it in ways I hadn't before. It didn't ruin it for me.
If you aren't into "The Little Prince" or any of de Saint-Exupery's other works, I can see why this may fall a little flat. On its own, this is a beautiful romantic story. It's competently told. Consuelo is not a bad writer. It is the story of a woman who falls for an aviator (Antoine de Saint-Exupery) and their difficult relationship. She is a woman who can clearly think for herself but she has chosen to play the wife of an aviator who later shows himself to be unfaithful to her - and she is aware of it. How she thinks this through and why she makes certain decisions is interesting.
However, against the background of de Saint-Exupery's other works such as "The Little Prince", I think it has particular impact. Antoine is celebrated as a children's author and depicts a blonde haired prince who leaves behind a rose he loves beyond all else as he roams among the planets. The rose is Consuelo.
Antoine was a curly, blonde haired man.
However, the story Consuelo does not depict the naive and childish prince that many loved in the childhood story. (Though he must have been charming as he got many a woman!) He certainly seemed to know what he was doing.
Consuelo depicts a strong and controlling man who cheated on her, and who swore he loved "his rose" ... but was that emotional manipulation to keep her in her place?
Or perhaps he was just not sure of his emotions? Maybe he could not decide?
Oh, the unreliability of a narrator!
It is interesting that there is always more than one side to the story. I still love "The Little Prince". But it is hard to look at the story without remembering the rose was not nearly as two-dimensional as depicted. In "The Little Prince" she is proud, vain and insecure, fiercely but uselessly defending herself with her thorns.
This tale of the rose shows a very different side of the rose.
If you aren't into "The Little Prince" or any of de Saint-Exupery's other works, I can see why this may fall a little flat. On its own, this is a beautiful romantic story. It's competently told. Consuelo is not a bad writer. It is the story of a woman who falls for an aviator (Antoine de Saint-Exupery) and their difficult relationship. She is a woman who can clearly think for herself but she has chosen to play the wife of an aviator who later shows himself to be unfaithful to her - and she is aware of it. How she thinks this through and why she makes certain decisions is interesting.
However, against the background of de Saint-Exupery's other works such as "The Little Prince", I think it has particular impact. Antoine is celebrated as a children's author and depicts a blonde haired prince who leaves behind a rose he loves beyond all else as he roams among the planets. The rose is Consuelo.
Antoine was a curly, blonde haired man.
However, the story Consuelo does not depict the naive and childish prince that many loved in the childhood story. (Though he must have been charming as he got many a woman!) He certainly seemed to know what he was doing.
Consuelo depicts a strong and controlling man who cheated on her, and who swore he loved "his rose" ... but was that emotional manipulation to keep her in her place?
Or perhaps he was just not sure of his emotions? Maybe he could not decide?
Oh, the unreliability of a narrator!
It is interesting that there is always more than one side to the story. I still love "The Little Prince". But it is hard to look at the story without remembering the rose was not nearly as two-dimensional as depicted. In "The Little Prince" she is proud, vain and insecure, fiercely but uselessly defending herself with her thorns.
This tale of the rose shows a very different side of the rose.