...
Show More
No one seems to have relished his own, well-crafted personal persona to Vidal's extent, nor been so brutally honest about his foibles ("Why do we always have to go get an English asshole for this sort of part when we have one of our own?" p. 145). I found particularly interesting his discussion of convergent vs. divergent minds. While it's true (p. 239) that many convergent minds are drawn to fields as teleological as Engineering, the great attraction of Engineering (rapid convergence on something that will be agreed upon as a potential solution) it also gives the mind more time to explore those ideas where divergent thinking can be more fruitfully applied. I was struck, in reading Vidal's memoir, that convergent minds are more drawn to ideology. It seems only in the divergent, speculative phase that ideology is productive, becoming ossified as spiritual inquiry is reduced to mindless ritual. Vidal's great strength was his intellectual fluidity.