...
Show More
Dick Francis owned the “horse racing mystery-thriller” franchise. And it paid off well for him. I haven’t read another of his that started with his jockey being “warned off.”
"“There can be no doubt that this was a most flagrant fraud on the racing public… No alternative but to suspend your licenses… And you, Dexter Cranfield, and you, Kelly Hughes, will be warned off Newmarket Heath until further notice.” Cranfield, pale and shaking, said, “I protest that this has not been a fair hearing. Neither Hughes nor I are guilty. The sentence is outrageous.” No response from Lord Gowery. Lord Ferth, however, spoke for the second time in the proceedings. “Hughes?” “I rode Squelch to win,” I said. “The witnesses were lying.” Gowery shook his head impatiently. “The Enquiry is closed. You may go.”"
Kelly Hughes is the jockey and we spend the first quarter of the book rehashing the charge and the hearing. It is only after we get a full dose of what that means for jockey, stables, etc. that we find Kelly determined to find out who was behind the plot to take his license away.
"“Kelly… Kelly Hughes?” I didn’t answer. “Hey, you’re not a bit like I thought.” She put her blond head on one side, assessing me. “None of those sports-writers ever said anything about you being smashing-looking and dead sexy.” I laughed. I have a crooked nose and a scar down one cheek from where a horse’s hoof had cut my face open, and among jockeys I was an also-ran as a bird-attracter. “It’s your eyes,” she said. “Dark and sort of smiley and sad and a bit withdrawn. Give me the happy shivers, your eyes do.”"
"I didn’t hear Roberta following me until she spoke in my ear as I opened the door. “Can you really do it?” she said. “Do what?” “Get your license back.” “It’s going to cost me too much not to. So I guess I’ll have to, or… “Or what?” I smiled. “Or die in the attempt.”"
Aside from this slightly different facet of racing, the book hits all the mileposts of a typical Dick Francis story.
The strength of this novel is in Francis’ weaving of social class distinctions into the “enquiry” aspects of horseracing. The weaknesses are the romantic and the sexual which just seem to be unable to hit the right notes.
3*
"“There can be no doubt that this was a most flagrant fraud on the racing public… No alternative but to suspend your licenses… And you, Dexter Cranfield, and you, Kelly Hughes, will be warned off Newmarket Heath until further notice.” Cranfield, pale and shaking, said, “I protest that this has not been a fair hearing. Neither Hughes nor I are guilty. The sentence is outrageous.” No response from Lord Gowery. Lord Ferth, however, spoke for the second time in the proceedings. “Hughes?” “I rode Squelch to win,” I said. “The witnesses were lying.” Gowery shook his head impatiently. “The Enquiry is closed. You may go.”"
Kelly Hughes is the jockey and we spend the first quarter of the book rehashing the charge and the hearing. It is only after we get a full dose of what that means for jockey, stables, etc. that we find Kelly determined to find out who was behind the plot to take his license away.
"“Kelly… Kelly Hughes?” I didn’t answer. “Hey, you’re not a bit like I thought.” She put her blond head on one side, assessing me. “None of those sports-writers ever said anything about you being smashing-looking and dead sexy.” I laughed. I have a crooked nose and a scar down one cheek from where a horse’s hoof had cut my face open, and among jockeys I was an also-ran as a bird-attracter. “It’s your eyes,” she said. “Dark and sort of smiley and sad and a bit withdrawn. Give me the happy shivers, your eyes do.”"
"I didn’t hear Roberta following me until she spoke in my ear as I opened the door. “Can you really do it?” she said. “Do what?” “Get your license back.” “It’s going to cost me too much not to. So I guess I’ll have to, or… “Or what?” I smiled. “Or die in the attempt.”"
Aside from this slightly different facet of racing, the book hits all the mileposts of a typical Dick Francis story.
The strength of this novel is in Francis’ weaving of social class distinctions into the “enquiry” aspects of horseracing. The weaknesses are the romantic and the sexual which just seem to be unable to hit the right notes.
3*