...
Show More
Ok, breaking it down:
I wouldn't have picked it up out of a store, probably - or out of the library. But I'm really glad I read it. I think I would have loved it when I was 10 or 11. The friendships would have kept me reading the whole series, I expect.
It really played the long game with Joe (and the resolution I know happened because of the tip-off of the next book's title in the back of this one is a good conclusion).
I think it's always interesting to write with a foreknowledge of circumstances in historical fiction for younger readers so the hinting at German soldiers was deftly done. Also, my birthday is on June 28 so the murder of Franz Ferdinand is something I think about sometimes and I liked that it was in here specifically when so few dates are.
The character of Betsy seems exactly like what Louisa May Alcott would have come up with if she had been alive and writing when Maud Hart Lovelace was so it was also great that Little Women was mentioned (2x) in the book.
I really liked that the nuances between types of love and degrees of love were explored. The overall values of the Betsy (and the author) I could get behind - she was a very thoughtful and socially conscious writer.
My mom growing up loved the book Marjorie Morningstar which was written around the same time period (also about a strong willed young woman who wants to be an artist - actress instead of writer). It was written by Herman Wouk (so, a man). In that book, in what has always seemed to me to be a not uncommon approach to 1950's values (especially from a man's perspective; and that something like The Feminine Mystique would have been an answer to), Marjorie gets any angst or desire for more satiated when she falls in and out of love with Noel Airman before settling into the
inevitability of domesticity. And absolutely, there is nothing wrong with any choice a person makes about their life circumstances.
But, when I read that book as a pre-teen I was disappointed. She goes to live in a way she had never seemed to truly want, until she did. And she could have had more, she just didn't take her own aspirations seriously because no one else had, or if they did - it was only to use her.
In this book, I love that Betsy maintains her individuality and passion and insistence on her own dreams as career worthy. AND I LOVE THAT PEOPLE IN HER LIFE SUPPORT HER.
She has an admirable amount of agency and foresight and is a great character/would have been a great role model when I was a kid/might be a great role model now, too.
I wouldn't have picked it up out of a store, probably - or out of the library. But I'm really glad I read it. I think I would have loved it when I was 10 or 11. The friendships would have kept me reading the whole series, I expect.
It really played the long game with Joe (and the resolution I know happened because of the tip-off of the next book's title in the back of this one is a good conclusion).
I think it's always interesting to write with a foreknowledge of circumstances in historical fiction for younger readers so the hinting at German soldiers was deftly done. Also, my birthday is on June 28 so the murder of Franz Ferdinand is something I think about sometimes and I liked that it was in here specifically when so few dates are.
The character of Betsy seems exactly like what Louisa May Alcott would have come up with if she had been alive and writing when Maud Hart Lovelace was so it was also great that Little Women was mentioned (2x) in the book.
I really liked that the nuances between types of love and degrees of love were explored. The overall values of the Betsy (and the author) I could get behind - she was a very thoughtful and socially conscious writer.
My mom growing up loved the book Marjorie Morningstar which was written around the same time period (also about a strong willed young woman who wants to be an artist - actress instead of writer). It was written by Herman Wouk (so, a man). In that book, in what has always seemed to me to be a not uncommon approach to 1950's values (especially from a man's perspective; and that something like The Feminine Mystique would have been an answer to), Marjorie gets any angst or desire for more satiated when she falls in and out of love with Noel Airman before settling into the
inevitability of domesticity. And absolutely, there is nothing wrong with any choice a person makes about their life circumstances.
But, when I read that book as a pre-teen I was disappointed. She goes to live in a way she had never seemed to truly want, until she did. And she could have had more, she just didn't take her own aspirations seriously because no one else had, or if they did - it was only to use her.
In this book, I love that Betsy maintains her individuality and passion and insistence on her own dreams as career worthy. AND I LOVE THAT PEOPLE IN HER LIFE SUPPORT HER.
She has an admirable amount of agency and foresight and is a great character/would have been a great role model when I was a kid/might be a great role model now, too.