...
Show More
This is a very controversial book among people who may or may not have read it but definitely have read criticisms of it and the TV show from which it originates. I knew that going in, and after actually reading the book, wondered - what exactly is so bad about this? Milan’s main premise is that dogs need structure and exercise more than affection to lead fulfilled, happy lives — but that their owners often only want the affection piece, leaving many dogs with issues that can escalate to aggression. Who could disagree? Milan’s theory on pack leadership may be on shaky scientific footing, but it’s hard to see how most of its precepts could actually harm dogs. And nearly all trainers, even those critical of Milan, emphasize that dogs need a confident leader. So what’s the difference? Milan is hated because he rarely uses physical corrections that (according to him) are designed to simulate feedback that a dog would receive from other dogs, not cause pain. But this is a few pages of the book in total, Milan does not describe the techniques in detail, and he repeatedly reminds readers it’s an absolute last resort. Critics seem to forget that Milan is often working with dogs who are about to be euthanized because of aggression and other behavioral issues, not Fido from down the street. I would never use a physical correction on my dog, but she’s also not dangerous. So I find those criticisms insincere and alarmist. In all, an okay read for those who looking for an interesting take on dog behavior that thoroughly refutes the anthropomorphized view of dogs that is prevalent in Western culture.