...
Show More
The 'Winner's Game' seems to be that of selling 300-page books extolling the virtues of passive investing in index funds - something that could be much more simply (but less profitably) explained in a short article.
For over 30 years now, I have found an extremely reliable heuristic to gauge the quality of others' thinking: it correlates highly with their skepticism about the theory of man-made global warming. This guy unfortunately fails that test.
On this theme, I'd also be interested in his views on pandemics, lockdowns and hastily developed coronavirus vaccines - another very reliable rule-of-thumb.
He also makes that classic mistake - much loved by amateur social historians - of comparing life expectancy today with that of a century prior, without factoring in the substantial increase due to the massive decline in child mortality over the period.
Would you trust someone like this with investment advice?
For over 30 years now, I have found an extremely reliable heuristic to gauge the quality of others' thinking: it correlates highly with their skepticism about the theory of man-made global warming. This guy unfortunately fails that test.
On this theme, I'd also be interested in his views on pandemics, lockdowns and hastily developed coronavirus vaccines - another very reliable rule-of-thumb.
He also makes that classic mistake - much loved by amateur social historians - of comparing life expectancy today with that of a century prior, without factoring in the substantial increase due to the massive decline in child mortality over the period.
Would you trust someone like this with investment advice?