...
Show More
I've read most of the History of Middle Earth series that covers the writing of the Silmarillion material. This was my first History of Middle Earth book that covered only Lord of the Rings (I read Sauron Defeated which was limited to a couple chapters on the Lord of the Rings). I had thought that the Lord of the Rings history would actually be even more interesting than the Silmarillion but I actually found that not to be the case in this book.
The history of the writing of the Lord of the Rings is different than the history of the writing of the Silmarillion. This stems from the fact that both of these publications are very different types of stories and narrative style; The Silmarillion being practically a history book and the Lord of the Rings being a flowing, detailed, and character-driven story. The history of the writing of the Silmarillion often contained unfinished detailed stories that actually expanded on the published Silmarillion and provided additional material not published elsewhere. This was because Christopher could not include it all when creating the published version. Contrast that with the Lord of the Rings drafts which were often just early rejected versions of the same story and, most times, the finished product is much more entertaining to read. Some of the drafts were just a worse version of what was eventually published.
This was not always true however. I found that by following some of the changes that Tolkien decided to make, I actually became more aware of important small things that often deepened my understanding of his characters. To give an example: Tolkien made a conscious choice to change his initial draft of Gandalf passing the ring on from Bilbo to Frodo. Tolkien decided that Gandalf would have placed the ring on the mantle after Bilbo left since he would not have held it in his hand the whole time between when Bilbo leaves and Frodo arrives. Gandalf understood the temptation of the ring and Tolkien's initial version where Gandalf just casually held onto it for a while didn't fit in with this. It was small things like this that were most interesting to me.
Other than that, the biggest takeaway just how little of a plan Tolkien had when embarking on this "Hobbit sequel". It's amazing how the story just unraveled as he wrote without following much of a plan. This was definitely different than what I would have expected.
The history of the writing of the Lord of the Rings is different than the history of the writing of the Silmarillion. This stems from the fact that both of these publications are very different types of stories and narrative style; The Silmarillion being practically a history book and the Lord of the Rings being a flowing, detailed, and character-driven story. The history of the writing of the Silmarillion often contained unfinished detailed stories that actually expanded on the published Silmarillion and provided additional material not published elsewhere. This was because Christopher could not include it all when creating the published version. Contrast that with the Lord of the Rings drafts which were often just early rejected versions of the same story and, most times, the finished product is much more entertaining to read. Some of the drafts were just a worse version of what was eventually published.
This was not always true however. I found that by following some of the changes that Tolkien decided to make, I actually became more aware of important small things that often deepened my understanding of his characters. To give an example: Tolkien made a conscious choice to change his initial draft of Gandalf passing the ring on from Bilbo to Frodo. Tolkien decided that Gandalf would have placed the ring on the mantle after Bilbo left since he would not have held it in his hand the whole time between when Bilbo leaves and Frodo arrives. Gandalf understood the temptation of the ring and Tolkien's initial version where Gandalf just casually held onto it for a while didn't fit in with this. It was small things like this that were most interesting to me.
Other than that, the biggest takeaway just how little of a plan Tolkien had when embarking on this "Hobbit sequel". It's amazing how the story just unraveled as he wrote without following much of a plan. This was definitely different than what I would have expected.