It’s a true history, we get it. You want to be as honest and close as possible to facts. But facts don’t make an enjoyable read. If it’s biographical, mightn’t you at least have an idea about what rules that make a coherent narrative, memoir, non-fiction, creative writing?
***
I came to this book after so many references about Tesla in popular culture. His name is permeating nearly every layer of modern civilization, in Koontz novels, on smart cars, on electric magazines, even on 9Gag. I expected that a man whose name is that widely known would be nothing less than a thick concoction of demonic excess and godly genius.
So I probably didn’t need to be patronized with adjectives that he is, well, legendary. I probably didn’t need adjectives to understand what his long, productive life already showed and hammered too clearly.
***
With a history as kaleidoscopic as Tesla, oscillating between divine and dingy, I would probably also be trying to understand in layman terms the story that could make Tesla, as supernaturally gifted as he was, evidently flawed and understandably human.
I came to read the book because I wanted to know Tesla. I wanted to imagine how it might have felt living in that period of time. Since this isn’t a textbook; as much as I want to know facts, I also want to be entertained. My theory was that, if I was entertained, if I sympathized with the characters in this story, I will vouch for him regardless to his shame and disillusionments.
But…okay. Look, it’s Tesla. I’m already bought. You don’t need to sell him to me.
It's Tesla and we're sold. It’s alright that Tesla was not always understandable. It’s expected of him.
It’s a shame that Tesla squandered his resources. It’s tough being Tesla. But did we also need to know that many details to understand that even Tesla was not spared? How hard was it to understand how it felt to have your project’s funding unplugged at such a stage? How hard would it be to show less evidence of his shame and just hint about it in succinct, subtle sentences?
Did we also need to know about the author’s graphological skills to understand how it felt to be Tesla? How was that relevant to Tesla? How much was the author gaining by wedging himself in the narrative? Did it help make this project easier?
I sure hope so. He only had that one shot, that one Tesla in the history of mankind, after all.