...
Show More
well, this was never quite 'my' sort of poetry. I think owen is much better at writing on war than any other thing -- evenso I worry because his lines are so nice sounding and pathos filled -- I worry about the ethics of having war poetry sound so melodic (though sad).
the introduction by CDL is interesting, as the memoir by blunden. this is also quite comprehensively annotated, so the scholar would find it fairly useful.
the other thing that bugs me is owen's attitude towards women. I mean, maybe I'm being sensitive, but you don't have to be quite so nasty, or assume we're sort of inept, or not worthy of love or whatever.
I feel that CDL and blunden exaggerate owen's talents; certainly he is a fine war poet, but I am not sure he is among the best, but that's just me. he does not have sassoon's talent for irony (I suppose, that's fair though, it's not his thing) but anyway all in all I'm not quite 'inspired' (or more appropriately, distressed)
that said, he is quite enjoyable to read, and I don't regret having this around at all.
the introduction by CDL is interesting, as the memoir by blunden. this is also quite comprehensively annotated, so the scholar would find it fairly useful.
the other thing that bugs me is owen's attitude towards women. I mean, maybe I'm being sensitive, but you don't have to be quite so nasty, or assume we're sort of inept, or not worthy of love or whatever.
I feel that CDL and blunden exaggerate owen's talents; certainly he is a fine war poet, but I am not sure he is among the best, but that's just me. he does not have sassoon's talent for irony (I suppose, that's fair though, it's not his thing) but anyway all in all I'm not quite 'inspired' (or more appropriately, distressed)
that said, he is quite enjoyable to read, and I don't regret having this around at all.