Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 97 votes)
5 stars
35(36%)
4 stars
35(36%)
3 stars
27(28%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
97 reviews
April 25,2025
... Show More
I understand why many people hate this book. Catherine and Heathcliff are monstrous. Monstrous. You won't like them because they are unlikable. They are irrational, self-absorbed, malicious and pretty much any negative quality you can think a person is capable of possessing without imploding. They seek and destroy and act with no thought to consequence. And I find it fascinating that Emily Bronte chose them to be her central protagonists.

When this was first published it was met with animosity because of how utterly repugnant these two characters were. The way they go about their business caring nothing for others but themselves was enough for me to shake my head in complete and total judgment, as if Catherine and Heathcliff could see me and are then effectively shamed by their actions.

Wuthering Heights is epic, in my humble opinion, because I believe that the scope of this story is monumental. Let me explain: it is a simple tale between two families that are bound in such a way that their fates are irrevocably linked. What affects one, affects the other. Its about Catherine and Heathcliff who fall in love and how their relationship ruins the lives of those around them. The book, all 400 pages of it, occur almost entirely at Wuthering Heights, the estate of the Earnshaws, and at Thrushcross Grange, the estate of the Lintons with only a couple of miles of land in between.

And yet it is not a small story.

The emotional magnitude of this book is great and far reaching. The provoking and unapologetic quality of Bronte's writing is seductive. The process of reading this story can feel so masochistic sometimes that its almost if she's daring us to stop reading and throw the book away. Like its a game of personal endurance to see how much we can take, how far we can go. She pushes at us, challenging us and all the while knowing that we have to keep reading because redemption awaits. It is nothing like its contemporaries.

The moors, the darkness of the moors, that curses the household of Wuthering Heights and its inhabitants is ever present. Nature is personified. It is its own character; its there, lingering and simmering ever so quietly, saturating every scene with its silent threats of doom...okay, I have to stop talking like this...what am I anymore?

There is poison in this book, but let me ease your mind by saying that it is balanced with goodness also. This isn't a perfect novel. There were still moments I found myself in perplexion (recently invented word). And while everything about Catherine and Heathcliff may be corrupt, there is hope in Wuthering Heights. If you can journey through the menacing forest of Emily Bronte's imagination, do it because the view is something to behold.

Ha ha ha, this review...what even is this?
April 25,2025
... Show More
This is a review I never imagined I’d write. This is a book I was convinced I’d love. I just have to face the facts, Emily is no Charlotte.

I’m going to start with the positives. The characterisation of Heathcliff is incredibly strong. He is a man who is utterly tormented by the world. As a gypsy boy he is dark skinned and dark haired, and to the English this rough, almost wild, look makes him a ruffian. He stands up for himself, and bites back; thus, he is termed a monster. In a very, very, Frankenstein’s monster like sense, his perceived outer image begins to permeate his soul. Call a man a monster, and eventually he may start acting like one.

“He’s not a rough diamond - a pearl-containing oyster of a rustic; he’s a fierce, pitiless, wolfish man.”

He is a very complex man, capable of great cruelty and kindness. The world has made him bitter, and in a way ruined him. He reaps revenge, but revenge always ends the same way; it doesn’t solve problems but creates more. So he becomes even more tormented, this time by his own actions. tHe is very Byronic, and by today’s standards a little bit of a bad boy. He has all the standard tropes of an anti-hero, one that becomes a figure that can be sympathised with and hated. He’s a very complex man.

The Bronte’s were directly affected by Byron’s poetry. Rochester is Charlotte’s portrayal of a similar, albeit less vengeful, character. Love is the key torment in both works. Heathcliff has been rejected, as Rochester cannot open his heart because of his secret wife. But, rather that overcome his personal loss, and subject the world to his dark and broody personality, Heathcliff actually seeks to do others harm. He is a very sensitive man when it comes to his own emotions, though he lacks any real empathy. He does not care that he is creating more pain for others. He spends his life spreading more hate into the world. His only redeeming quality is his love for Catherine, but that doesn’t excuse his tyranny. He knows how nasty he is:

"She abandoned [her home] under a delusion," he answered, "picturing in me a hero of romance, and expecting unlimited indulgences from my chivalrous devotion. I can hardly regard her in the light of a rational creature, so obstinately has she persisted in forming a fabulous notion of my character and acting on the false impressions she cherished."

He's so self-centred:

  

So I rather like his character, well not like but appreciate the complexity, though the novel’s structure itself was abysmal. I have quite a few problems with the narrative.

Why is a servant telling us this story as she speaks to a visitor of her master’s house? Why are we hearing someone’s interpretation of the events rather than the events themselves? Why is it twenty years later in the form of an extremely long conversation? Why is the servant still actually working for Heathcliff? She would have left. Nobody would choose to work for such a man. It just doesn’t make a lot of sense. At times it felt like the credibility of the story was stretched to breaking point. Nelly (the servant) actually being in some of the scenes was almost laughable. Often it was followed by a terrible explanation attempting to justify her presence. It sounded very desperate to me.

This leads perfectly on to my next point. Half way through the story (the start of volume ii) we are told that the conversation has ended. We then hear the visitor’s description of the servant’s narrative about Heathcliff’s life. I mean seriously? So there are three layers of storytelling. Isn’t that completely unnecessary and overcomplicated? Why not just have Heathcliff tell the story or at the very least have the servant tell the story from start to finish in one story arc with no time shifts. For me, it felt like Emily wrote herself into a corner with her choice of narrative and desperately tried to write herself out of it to the point of ridiculousness. How much of the story can we believe? How much bias is in the narratives?

Then there was the dialogue overloads. Large parts of the novel were entirely conversational. The narration was minimalistic and bare. The only character whose thoughts we were privy to, again Nelly the servant, was completely irrelevant to the plot. Who cares about the servant’s emotion and reactions? This isn’t her story; thus, the dialogue was packed out to the point of unnaturalness to fit in the thoughts of characters whose minds we weren’t privy to. Simply put, the characters said things people wouldn’t realistically say in conversation. It was overflowing with emotions and private thoughts. It was awkward. I’m not talking about private conversations, those don’t happen as Nelly is awkwardly present for every single event, but announcements or decisions (that should be internal) announced to a group of people. This is why plays have asides and soliloquies. And this is why novels aren’t told from the perspective of a random servant.

There is clearly a great story here. Plot wise the novel is wonderful. But the way in which Emily told her story was nothing short of disastrous. It felt like a wasted opportunity. I’m absolutely horrified at how poor it is. This novel needed to be taken apart, re-wrote, and put back together again. Perhaps then it would have been worthy of the story it failed to tell. I’ve never been so massively underwhelmed in such a blatant lack of skill in a canonised piece of literature, one that has immense critical reception.

___________________________________

You can connect with me on social media via My Linktree.
__________________________________
April 25,2025
... Show More
"I am Heathcliff - he's always, always in my mind - not as a pleasure, any more then I am always a pleasure to myself - but, as my own being.”--Catherine

Last year I read Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre with my YA class as a way of introducing them to a historical context for romance novels and the gothic and I loved it. Jane, Jane, Jane! This year I read Wuthering Heights with my YA class for similar reasons, and I liked it quite a lot, but not nearly as much as I did Jane Eyre. Such was the case with reviewers when WH came out in 1847, by Charlotte’s younger sister Emily. It’s not a bildungsroman, we want a bildungsroman! In other words, a more straightforward coming-of-age, rags-to-riches story with an ending we are happy with.

Emily Bronte puzzled her readers and reviewers in 1847 with this essentially two part generational narrative structure, and, well, if you think the brooding Rochester is complicated, okay, but the brooding Heathcliff?! I mean, there is something to consider in many of the great nineteenth century female authors creating their beloved famous dark and brooding heroes: Darcy (from Pride and Prejudice), Rochester (from Jane Eyre) and now the beastiest of the broodiest beast of all, Heathcliff. What’s a young man reading these books to think he should do to become attractive to women?! Is this how frogs in desks and pigtails in ink came about as a signal to attraction? Marry me or I will go insane and torment you forever?!

“Catherine Earnshaw, may you not rest as long as I am living. You said I killed you--haunt me then. The murdered do haunt their murderers. I believe--I know that ghosts have wandered the earth. Be with me always--take any form--drive me mad. Only do not leave me in this abyss, where I cannot find you! Oh, God! It is unutterable! I cannot live without my life! I cannot live without my soul!”--Heathcliff

I won’t review the plot in great detail, you have 2,000 reviews for that, but well, this is a gothic story (with moors and wild dogs and storms and ghosts and over-the-top wild and passionate speeches) which may indeed be a romance, if you can count being driven to animality (the beast to Catherine’s beauty?) and if driven-to-insanity can count as a kind of love. If obsession can count as a kind of love. And if Heathcliff is a hard sell as romantic hero (to me, but I’m not the target audience for his vibe), Catherine Earnshaw is no typically romantic heroine, either, choosing wealthier and saner Edgar Linton to marry against her baser and more elemental instincts. As she admits, she is in love with both Linton and Heathcliff, yin/yang, wants both of them in her life, but of Heathcliff she says,

“He's more myself than I am. Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same.”

The second half, in which Heathcliff tries to wed his frail and whiny son Linton (whom he fathered with Isabella, Edgar Linton’s sister; I know, you need a character map with multiple highlighters to follow this one) to young Catherine, his real love Catherine’s daughter, well it just isn’t as interesting as the first half, with a less memorable conclusion, though there are powerful moments, such as Heathcliff’s dramatic confrontation with the married and pregnant Catherine. And there’s ghost sightings, always good to have ghost sightings in a gothic tale.

Overall, worthy of a classic, I’d say!
April 25,2025
... Show More
Dark, atmospheric, disturbing and fascinating. I love reading about horrible characters, doomed romances, bleakness and darkness, so this was perfect for me. It's awfully dramatic and ridiculous at times, but I loved it all.
April 25,2025
... Show More
As brilliant on the eleventh reading as on the first . . . A brilliant, dark, complicated and wonderful story, and one of my favourites of all time. I just completely adore it.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Are you into edgy gothic British novels from the 18th century? Emily Brontë’s your girl. Her one and only novel, Wuthering Heights, holds themes of family grudges, revenge, unrequited love, as well as blunt language.

Back in high school when I first started really digging in deep with classic books and discussing them in class etc. I was always drawn towards the Brontë sisters stories and they hold a special place in my heart.


˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ ಇ.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Note: Content and trigger warnings are written at the end as they may contain spoilers.

"Treachery and violence are spears pointed at both ends; they wound those who resort to them worse than their enemies."

Yorkshire, England (ca. 1700s – 1800s) — Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights towers as a tight exploration of the cycles of intergenerational abuse, wrapped in a façade of exceptional Gothic romance that blinds readers from Brontë's bold efforts in challenging the safe, trite Victorian ideas of her time.

Not many a time a novel so complex exists that it can be viewed in two perspectives, as a romance novel or a tragedy, with one stealing the narrative's glory in comparison with viewing it using the other. Wuthering Heights does this perspectival paradox so well that it continues to polarize readers from its first publication when Brontë is still known as Ellis Bell, until today when the world acknowledges the book to be one of the greatest among the English literary canon. In Heights, Brontë fearlessly depicts the Gothic qualities of the story she has in mind: through the atmospheric description of the Yorkshire moors, the mentions of ghosts and ghost-like characters, and the eerily comprehensive introduction of the Heights known for the "quantity of grotesque carvings on its doors" and the "wilderness of crumbling griffins" in its premises. Through her brilliant use of doubles, juxtaposition, and parallelism to highlight the intricacies of her drama, Brontë crafts a multi-faceted story that is as messy and vicious as its characters and their genealogy can be. With Brontë's courageous efforts to challenge societal ideals and push the confines of on-page stark violence acceptability in novels, the elusive author has created a pioneering text of the Gothic genre and a definitive English classic confident enough to defy religious and moral Victorian expectations.

Wuthering Heights may certainly be unpleasant, but it is the type of unpleasant where you classify beautiful nightmares and immersive narratives under—the genius Emily Brontë did, and the genius nobody can discredit her from extraordinarily creating.

Personal Enjoyment: 4.75 stars
Quality of the Book: 4.4 stars
- Use of Language: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Plot and Narrative Arc: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Characters: ⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Integrity: ⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Message: ⭐⭐⭐⭐

AVG: 4.58 stars | RAVE

-----
CW/TW: physical violence, physical abuse, mental abuse, self-harm, suicide¹

-----
Note:
[1] SPOILER: It is important to scrutinize the context of the suicide of Heathcliff as it may be different from those rooted on contemporary mental health issues. Due to the novel being categorized as a Gothic romance, elements of love and death are incorporated by Brontë in ways that are faithful in the tragedy her narrative wants to portray.

-----
[Some comments in this post are for the pre-review I wrote which contained highlighted reactions from my status updates. You may check the actual status updates through the links below to understand the context behind the comments.]

Status Updates:
[START] i'm still alive | two chapters in and i'm already confused!!! | this gothic realness will give me nightmares | if people nowadays are this poetic | does Brontë know about me? | Heathcliff, king of the abusers | Loving! Did anybody even hear the like! | Linton is me, I am Linton | that pure gothic realness of an ending [END]
April 25,2025
... Show More
March 31, 2022 - Just completed my 3rd reading of Wuthering Heights.

Emotionally draining but worth every minute of reading it. I enjoyed it even more this time around.

I admire this book for its tone and setting. Quite possibly my favorite novel.

—————————————————————————
ORIGINAL REVIEW BELOW:

Wuthering Heights is a beautiful novel. 5 (dark) stars!

I'm not completely sure what I just experienced with Wuthering Heights. I believe that Emily Bronte's primary goal was to evoke the wide range of human emotions through the lives and interactions of the Linton's, Earnshaw's and Mr. Heathcliff.

I found this list of human emotions online:

Acceptance
Affection
Aggression
Ambivalence
Apathy
Anxiety
Boredom
Compassion
Confusion
Contempt
Depression
Doubt
Ecstasy
Empathy
Envy
Embarrassment
Euphoria
Forgiveness
Frustration
Gratitude
Grief
Guilt
Hatred
Hope
Horror
Hostility
Homesickness
Hunger
Hysteria
Interest
Loneliness
Love
Paranoia
Pity
Pleasure
Pride
Rage
Regret
Remorse
Shame
Suffering
Sympathy

Reading through this list, Bronte touches on all (or at least nearly all) of them in Wuthering Heights. The protagonist, Heathcliff, is obviously not a very lovable guy, but he is extremely complex and multi-faceted and his life long search for peace within his soul is memorable and his fascinating (very emotional) story will stick with me for a long time.

The setting at the house, Wuthering Heights, was very well done and it worked well for the dark, gothic, and macabre plot.

The bright spot in Wuthering Heights is the younger Catherine. The novel took a good turn for me as a reader when she was introduced and I loved her as a character.

Although it is extremely dark and gothic, Wuthering Heights has it all - unforgettable plot, realistic settings, and truly human, deep characters. Highly recommended!
April 25,2025
... Show More
i love reading books about crazy and straight up evil people
(that's all I'm gonna say about this book for now since my brain is totally fried)
April 25,2025
... Show More
It’s so unusual to find a good story with terrible characters.

I don’t mean characters we dislike due to their personality or choices, but because, at their core, they’re weak or cruel or, maybe, just plain evil. So, to open up a book 175 years old, having only heard “It’s a great love story!” as guidance, Wuthering Height is probably the biggest false advertisement I’ve ever faced which made it so much better to read.

Being honest, the beginning was slow and boring. It’s the most technically challenging book I’ve read in a while after a break from reading and a large consumption of mostly YA books in the past few years. Secondly, I didn’t know where it was going. Heathcliff may be the star of this story, but he’s not the one to tell it. Our protagonist, Mr Lockwood, is literally a random person who doesn’t hold any relevance to the plot except to hear the woeful tale of Wuthering Heights from someone who also isn’t Heathcliff (a bit like a book Inception, if you will). But the more I got stuck in and the more my page count trickled upward each day, I came to appreciate it for what it was. Not a love story exactly, but instead a depiction of the cruelty and wickedness of humanity.

Long story short. Heathcliff, a gypsy boy, is adopted by Earnshaw to Wuthering Heights, a house among the Moors. There he spends his childhood, in love with Earnshaw’s daughter Catherine, hated by Hindley, Earnshaw’s son. As they grow up, their lives become entangled with another family, the Linton’s, and they more they intersect, the more chaos is caused.

For a lot of the story, I wondered where were things going, because from the start all of these characters continued to be unpredictable. Cathy is bad-tempered, Hindley, abusive, The Lintons, weak, (though I liked them both) and Heathcliff…he’s basically a sociopath, I don’t know what other way to put it. All their children are equally frustrating (with such similar names to their parentage), yet I was completely sucked into the drama of their lives. Because this book takes the risk of of irredeemable characters, it suddenly becomes so more unique and fascinating to read. They have unhappy marriages, are abusive, treat one another terribly, that you lose hope in their humanity. And to think of how long ago this was published, I would’ve loved to seen the uproar at time.

Because how many happy books and characters do we have? How many relationships are unbreakable and honest, and last without flaws? This could’ve been an easy love story about a boy from a low background trying to marry a girl who’s from a privileged family. But no. Heathcliff and Cathy are callous and deceitful, and marry other people, and then treat their spouses with hatred. It’s remarkable a book this old went to challenge social norms during such a conservative time period. Never once is there sympathy in this book. People hate (or love) each so much, they dedicate their lives to getting revenge in such weird ways on each other. And that's where the believability lies. These cruel character with their selfish impulses and violence reflect the part of society and relationships we don't talk about. We like the happy endings and soul mates, but this book is just a portrayal of the opposite side. The qualities of the characters in this book are qualities that exist in real life, and maybe we'd like to believe they're unrealistic, but the truth is, most people lay between this and the Disney, rom-com ending. We'd just rather not see the former because we want to believe love is a perfect thing, when this book proves that's not always a correct view to have.

In terms of characters, Nellie and Edgar were the only remotely nice people, as well as Hareton. And I’m just clarifying my stance here, but there is no way Heathcliff can be considered redeemable. He’s a brilliant character and incredibly complex, but to those who are convinced he’s some kind of swash-buckling romantic figure, I’m just so confused. Give me your thought process.

I must admit, I also see the allure of referring to this book as romance novel due to the sheer intensity of Heathcliff and Cathy’s relationship, but I feel Bronte was much more focused on the negative aspects of these characters. Yes, they may be abusers and wicked people, but they can love in their own, odd ways. At the same time, they’re still abusers and wicked people. Their love, strong as it is, does not detract from the things they’ve done. In fact, maybe their love was the cause of the downfall of all these people anyway.

I didn’t mind “It’s a story, about a guy who’s told a story” as a choice of narrative, and while I actually felt I didn’t get a full picture of the Moors, I feel the spooky atmosphere was always spot on. My stars are lost on the general slowness of the beginning and the last fifty pages took such a random turn, I put down the book to laugh at the absurdness of it, thinking “what is this book?” It felt like the third act twist of a B-list horror move. But the characters and their choices stayed fascinating and the psychology of each one of them left so much for me to explore. I thought it was a bold take on what we expect of a romance story and I'm glad I picked it up.

(I really hated Heathcliff's son though. I just need to write that down.)
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.