...
Show More
Wuthering Heights was assigned to me during my senior year of high school. I didn’t read it then. Even though I read a lot of books at that time, I just couldn’t get into classics, and bluffed my way through English class with a healthy collection of Cliffs Notes.
So, what do I think now that I have finally read Wuthering Heights? In some ways, it’s quite stilted because of the writing conventions of the time. Everything is presented through the recounting of a present narrator instead of simply an omniscient one. Pretty much every character has a double, and the entire second half of the book repeats the first half with changes meant to highlight the differences between the first and second generation of characters.
But overall, the book was not what I expected and instead kind of bonkers. Multiple children, women, and spouses are psychologically and physically abused. A character drinks himself to death. Considering Catherine and Heathcliff are one of literature’s most famous couples, I’m not sure “toxic” goes far enough to describe how unsuited they are for each other. She loves him in her way, but chooses another for social status. Once spurned, he dusts himself off and finds someone else. Just kidding. He engages on a multi-generational scheme of revenge with a capital R, marrying a woman he hates, attempting to ruin a child’s life simply because of who his father was, and finally using his own unloved son as part of his vengeance.
As one might expect from a classic, the writing is excellent. Catherine and Heathcliff’s declarations of love for each other are flowery, passionate, generally over-the-top, and probably a big part of why people remember this book as being “romantic” when it’s not. But other lines illustrate the point. How monstrous is Heathcliff? Here’s a line he says about his own son and potential daughter-in-law: “Had I been born where laws are less strict and tastes less dainty, I should treat myself to a slow vivisection of those two, as an evening's amusement.” Or this one, in which he compares his son to the son of his higher-born rival:
So, what do I think now that I have finally read Wuthering Heights? In some ways, it’s quite stilted because of the writing conventions of the time. Everything is presented through the recounting of a present narrator instead of simply an omniscient one. Pretty much every character has a double, and the entire second half of the book repeats the first half with changes meant to highlight the differences between the first and second generation of characters.
But overall, the book was not what I expected and instead kind of bonkers. Multiple children, women, and spouses are psychologically and physically abused. A character drinks himself to death. Considering Catherine and Heathcliff are one of literature’s most famous couples, I’m not sure “toxic” goes far enough to describe how unsuited they are for each other. She loves him in her way, but chooses another for social status. Once spurned, he dusts himself off and finds someone else. Just kidding. He engages on a multi-generational scheme of revenge with a capital R, marrying a woman he hates, attempting to ruin a child’s life simply because of who his father was, and finally using his own unloved son as part of his vengeance.
As one might expect from a classic, the writing is excellent. Catherine and Heathcliff’s declarations of love for each other are flowery, passionate, generally over-the-top, and probably a big part of why people remember this book as being “romantic” when it’s not. But other lines illustrate the point. How monstrous is Heathcliff? Here’s a line he says about his own son and potential daughter-in-law: “Had I been born where laws are less strict and tastes less dainty, I should treat myself to a slow vivisection of those two, as an evening's amusement.” Or this one, in which he compares his son to the son of his higher-born rival:
But there's this one difference: one is gold put to the use of paving-stones, and the other is tin polished to ape a service of silver. Mine has nothing valuable about it; yet I shall have the merit of making it go as far as such poor stuff can go. His had first-rate qualities, and they are lost, rendered worst than unavailing.I’m not sure I enjoyed the book, though I did read it quickly so that’s one sign I did. There were parts I thought dragged, and I’m not sure there’s a redeeming character in the entire book, save the narrators. Still, the writing was lush, and the story so dark.... 31 years later, I have to say Mrs. Minnick was right: Wuthering Heights is certainly a book worth reading. Recommended if you, like me, dodged it in your youth.