The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the Un

... Show More
The book every American must own! "The 9/11 Commission Report" is the official government report on the events leading to and following September 11th - now available as an AudioVisual Book, an easier way to read, hear and visualize the report. Special bonus material included. The AudioVisual book format allows you to read and listen on your computer, listen on DVD and MP3 player and iPod type devices. It combines the best advantages of paper books, electronic & audio books, as well as video technology. AudioVisual books allow the 1000+ footnotes to be pulled into the main body of the text and read aloud without losing one's place. The print size can be enlarged for easy reading. The page background color and texture can be selected for ease of reading, and electronic notes can be taken and identified with specific text. It includes tools to help you word search, highlight, and bookmark. Bonus materials include video interviews.

Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
37(37%)
4 stars
33(33%)
3 stars
30(30%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews All reviews
April 25,2025
... Show More
I just finished a C J Box thriller that referenced this report, and I got Fall and Rise as a gift. I've owned The 9//11 Commission Report for years, but hadn't yet read it, so this seemed like a good time. It's well-written and goes into detail about what actually happened that day (although not from an architectural engineering POV, sorry truthers). There is some background on the history, but not nearly as much as The Looming Tower. It is more a study of what went wrong as far as preventing or anticipating the attack and follows up with recommendations going forward. This is a government commission, so the focus is on law enforcement and intelligence, not steps for private industry or civilians.
There is sort of a time capsule effect reading it so many years later. It's interesting to see what recommendations were acted on and how things have changed in general. We're much more sensitive to this particular type of terrorism and aviation safety, but issues with cyber crime and the 2016 election show that we still tend to "fight the last war" as they say.
I also think that if you told the commissioners at the time of writing that we'd still be fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan all these years later, they would have found it hard to believe. Nonetheless, here we are, and this book helps show how we got here.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Stunning and informative and depressing and scary. It is hard to say what is more unnerving about the revelations of this tome; that so many conspiracy theories persist, or that the true lessons of it seem to have gone completely unheeded by both sides of the political divide. One startling implication of the report is the freezing effect the Republican campaign to impeach Bill Clinton hindered our ability to get Bin Laden. Many times, apparently, opportunities were halted for political reasons, and Clinton tried and failed to get Republican support to go after Bin Laden, but he was accused, literally, of "wagging the dog". That the politics of smear played that big a role in the evolution of events that led to 9/11 should have brought about a more bipartisan tone in Washington. Alas. Also notable is the fact that the few successes that day - particularly the air traffic controllers who grounded all planes in 3 hours despite not having any plan for such an unprecedented action - were down to a lack of bureaucracy. In their final report, they advised against - against - developing a set of rules or guidelines for another such future event, noting that the freedom to think and use their own individual judgment is the only reason they air traffic controllers succeeded that day. Also notable in the report: an overwhelming lack of any evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11. The report makes it clear that Clinton didn't have the political strength, let alone support, to do anything about terrorism even though he knew it was the most important issue of the day, and Bush didn't want to hear anything about terrorism because he had an "anything but Clinton" policy. The lesson of the 9/11 Commission Report is not one of conspiracy or of evil. It is one of incompetence and sadness, and every American should read it.

NC
April 25,2025
... Show More
Wer die Bilder gesehen hat, wie zuerst das eine und dann das andere Flugzeug in die Türme des World Trade Centre geflogen ist, wird sie wahrscheinlich nicht mehr vergessen. Die Ereignisse an diesem Tag haben den Terrorismus auf eine neue Stufe gestellt. Die 9/11 Commission wurde 2002 gegründet, um die Gegebenheiten zu ergründen, die zu den Anschlägen am 9. September 2001 geführt haben. Gleichzeitig sollte sie auch Vorschläge machen, wie ein Anschlag wie dieser in Zukunft verhindert werden kann.

Wahrscheinlich weiß jeder von uns noch, wo er war und was er getan hat, als er das erste Mal von den Anschlägen hörte. Die Attentäter waren schnell identifiziert und die Schuldigen schnell ausgemacht. Aber wie konnte es dazu kommen und noch wichtiger: wie kann ein Anschlag dieser Art in Zukunft verhindert werden?

Die 9/11 Commission versucht, Antwort auf diese Fragen zu geben. Ohne Schuldzuweisungen listet sie die Fakten auf. Sicher, im Nachhinein kann man sich fragen, warum die Aktivitäten der Attentäter nicht im Vorfeld aufgefallen sind oder warum sie am Flughafen nicht besser kontrolliert wurden, obwohl sie aufgefallen sind. Die Antwort ist einfach: man hat nicht mit einem Anschlag dieser Art und Größenordnung gerechnet. Es gab im Vorfeld immer wieder Bombenanschläge und das war die Art von Terror, vor dem man sich schützen wollte.

Dass Osama Bin Laden eine Gefahr darstellte, war bekannt. Aber auch hier hat man das Ausmaß nicht einschätzen können. Bis wenige Tage vor den Anschlägen gab es immer wieder Diskussionen darüber im Kongress darüber, als wie gefährlich man Bin Laden und Al Kaida einstufen sollte.

Es gab kleinere Kritikpunkte: im Vorfeld war die Übergangszeit zwischen der Regierung von Bill Clinton und der von George W. Bush war lange und in dieser Zeit gab es keinen Verantwortlichen für das "Problem" Bin Laden. Die verschiedenen Behörden haben nicht zusammengearbeitet und so wurden Informationen nicht weitergeleitet. Am 11.9. haben die verschiedenen Luftüberwachungszentren nicht richtig miteinander kommuniziert. Die Mitarbeiter waren mit der Situation überfordert. Am World Trade Centre haben das NYPD und NYFD ihre Einsätze nicht organisiert und waren auch nicht vorbereitet für ein Ereignis dieser Größenordnung. Aber alle diese Punkte lassen sich unter einem Punkt zusammenfassen: man hat sich nicht vorstellen können, dass so etwas passiert.

Der 9/11 Commission Report liest sich trotz der vielen Fakten nicht wie ein Sachbuch. Manchmal hätte ich mir aber einen sachlicheren Bericht gewünscht, denn gerade die Berichte aus den Flugzeugen sind mir sehr nahe gegangen. Trotzdem bin ich froh, den Bericht gelesen zu haben denn er hat einige Fragen für mich beantwortet.
April 25,2025
... Show More
This is a fascinating read; there are three major things I learned from it.



First, I started reading it about a week before the “Christmas-Day-Panty-Bomber” incident, and it appears that most of the “intelligence failures” that surrounded the 9/11 attacks are still a huge problem, because many of the same things happened (or, more importantly, didn’t happen) with that incident ... five years later.



Second, a huge part of what we know about the planning and execution of the 9/11 attacks we learned from Kahlid Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi BinAlshibh. And (this is my personal observation here, not the commission’s) - does anyone really think we would have learned anything from them without “enhanced interrogation techniques”?



Third, for anyone who has tried (or is still trying) to blame the 9/11 attacks on any particular group, cause, political party, person or factor other than the people who actually carried it out ... give it up. There is plenty of blame to be shared by all.



This book was actually easier to read than I thought it would be. It’s dry in spots, but basically it reads like a novel. It is heavily footnoted (which, of course, is a GOOD thing), and I did read the footnotes as well as the main text, so that made it a bit more cumbersome than just reading the “story” would have been.



Next, I want to research the recommendations made by the commission at the end of the report, to figure out what, if anything, has been done about them. In many cases I think I already know the answer ... “we have a committee working on that.” I know for certain that we’ve made no progress on one of them ... one which the commission stated was of vital importance: standardizing the transliteration of Arabic names so that potential terrorists can’t slip through the cracks due to a misspelling of or typographical error in the English version of their name. Of course, this is exactly what happened with the panty bomber ... five years later. That committee must not be working hard enough. Sigh.
April 25,2025
... Show More
The commission does a great job of conveying what happened on 9/11, as well as what could have been done to prevent it. This report details the opportunities the U.S. government had to take out Bin Laden before 9/11, as well as the repeated failures or the FAA to inform the Pentagon planes had been hijacked. It also details how counterterrorism has evolved since 9/11, and what still needs to be done.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Meticulous research, but perhaps not the best book to serve as a general introduction to this topic. Best thought of more as a database. By the nature of their task, they had to include every little detail. Can make for tiring reading.
April 25,2025
... Show More
2 stars.The report has been informative and has pointed out many flaws in the failure of both intelligence; the pre-planning being the focal cause of the worst intelligence failure of the century, and security, also questioning the reader of who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Moreover, yet learning a lot about 9/11 from other sources(News, Documentaries, books etc) there was a lot of contradiction I found in the book. Additionally some facts discovered from other sources were more likely to be realistic in some relation to ISLAM than those stated in this report to negatively portray muslims. This is exceptionally satisfying for many, in particular Americans and westerners to “talk about” Islamic Extremism. As many years have passed since this tragic incident, I personally believe that other well-informed people whether be Americans or Westerners know that this was only created as a ground to invade Afghanistan by Bush administration. Concluding it with the statement that it is a “National Disgrace”.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Although the 9/11 terrorist attack is the main focus of the report and–obviously–the reason why it was written, the 9/11 Commission Report is better described as the history of Al-Qaeda and the US government respond to its threat.

Half of the report is centered on giving context to the attack, with only two chapters (the 1th and 9th respectively) solely centering on 9/11. The rest can be divided into three categories: the ones centered in Al-Qaeda formation, its history and operations against the US, and the preparation of 9/11; the US government and the difficulty of information sharing between departments, its actions against Al-Qaeda, and the multiple missing opportunities that could have prevented the attack; and, finally, the actions that–according to the Commission–the US government should take to prevent new attacks and to stop the spreading of Extremism in the Wuslim World.

In the first two categories and in the description of the attack itself, the Commision does an excellent work on explaining the many difficulties that the US government suffered from, Al-Qaeda history and context, and the struggle of first responders and the heroism that both them and civilians showed during 9/11.

The third category, though, is the reason why I didn't know if I should give the report 5 stars...or 3, ending instead in the middle. This is because in this part the Commission manage to predict a great amount of events that would happen years after the publication of the report (page 367 comes to mind, as in this page they manage to predict the appearance of ISIS in Iraq and the remerge of the Taliban in Afghanistan). Still the reason why they manage to predict them was because their recommendations on how to deal with Islamist terrorism were ignored, meaning that this commission had little influence.

In conclusion, the Commission Report is an essential read to understand the world in which we live–as 9/11 has deeply affected the West, not only the US–but while knowing that this report fell in deaf ears, meaning that many of the problems that this commission tried to resolve have survived to the present.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.