Six Easy Pieces: Essentials of Physics Explained by Its Most Brilliant Teacher

... Show More
Six Easy Essentials of Physics Explained by Its Most Brilliant Teacher is a publishing first. This set couples a book containing the six easiest chapters from Richard P. Feynman's landmark work, Lectures on Physics —specifically designed for the general, non-scientist reader—with the actual recordings of the late, great physicist delivering the lectures on which the chapters are based. Nobel Laureate Feynman gave these lectures just once, to a group of Caltech undergraduates in 1961 and 1962, and these newly released recordings allow you to experience one of the Twentieth Century's greatest minds—as if you were right there in the classroom.

138 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,1994

About the author

... Show More
Richard Phillips Feynman was an American physicist known for the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the theory of quantum electrodynamics and the physics of the superfluidity of supercooled liquid helium, as well as work in particle physics (he proposed the parton model). For his contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics, Feynman was a joint recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965, together with Julian Schwinger and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga. Feynman developed a widely used pictorial representation scheme for the mathematical expressions governing the behavior of subatomic particles, which later became known as Feynman diagrams. During his lifetime and after his death, Feynman became one of the most publicly known scientists in the world.

He assisted in the development of the atomic bomb and was a member of the panel that investigated the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. In addition to his work in theoretical physics, Feynman has been credited with pioneering the field of quantum computing, and introducing the concept of nanotechnology (creation of devices at the molecular scale). He held the Richard Chace Tolman professorship in theoretical physics at Caltech.

-wikipedia

See Ричард Фейнман

Community Reviews

Rating(4.2 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
41(41%)
4 stars
33(33%)
3 stars
25(25%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews All reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
Almost five-stars. For someone like me (i.e., a layperson that has no background in physics whatsoever), this is a great introduction to the mysterious world of physics—it is humorous and accessible and makes an effort to be "approximately accurate" about everything (while calling itself out on things that are simplified for the sake of the example or else "unknown or unknowable"). However, to be "approximately accurate about everything" means a bunch of math and other fancy-pants equations that look like this:

|ĥ₁ + ĥ₂|² = |ĥ₁|² + |ĥ₂|² + 2|ĥ₁||ĥ₂| cos δ

...which despite my best efforts remain cloaked in physics' mysterious shroud.

"Easy Pieces", these are not.

However, Feynman explains the subject matter well—and certainly better than most other folks that have tried to write this sort of thing.

I'm adding him to my short list of heroes.
April 17,2025
... Show More
If we take a concept and can’t “…reduce it to the freshman level. That means we really don’t understand it.”

This approach to learning and teaching is so true with everything, not just physics. And yet somehow, it’s rare to find people who can break down concepts making it easy to understand and fun. Surely a skill to learn!

Thoroughly enjoyed both this and the second part.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Note to reader: I am not within Feynman's target demographic...

So if anyone is familiar with Feynman's "claim to fame," it's basically the idea that he's the most brilliant Physicis teacher of the 20th century and his lectures are ingenius in both their presentation and method.

Now, I'm not the most science-inclined person out there. I've never taken even a preliminary physics course (and these lectures were intended for his intro Caltech class, so...). But I'm also not dumb as a rock, either.

With that said, I didn't understand much of this book. I could follow along vaguely and in general terms. But could I explain to someone else what gravitational energy is now? Definitely not. In fact, I can barely remember the different topics in the book now because of how little I actually retained about them.

For people who think this is going to be a magical book that will teach what were once almost mysteriously complicated ideas with wonderful simplicity - think again. You would never become truly knowledgeable on any of these topics with only this small of an overview. But, if you are scientifically inclined, it might at least be interesting and prompt you to take your learning further. It does get more technical than I thought it would. Although nowhere near as technical as the topics actually go.

All in all, I didn't really enjoy it. Which is why it's 3 stars. But I could see its merit for Physics students and it did bring to light various big questions about science in general, which is why it didn't get 2 or 1.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Read it for the love and beauty of physics. Everyone knows the brilliance of Mr. Feynman. This book is like the summary notes of some of the chapters from his very famous Physics lectures at Caltech. His basic rule about understanding where he said If you understood something, try to teach it to an 8 years old kid. If he gets it, you understood it. This book justifies this perfectly. He explained the basics in pretty simple language specially the last chapter on the introduction of Quantum Physics where he teaches us Double-slit experiment. He simplifies complex fundamentals yet keep the beauty intact. Looking forward to read more of his work because it's just the beginning.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Apparently these are the 6 "easiest to understand" (despite the inclusion of quantum mechanics!") of the Feynman lectures. Some of them flit too much from one thing to another; I'm sure they were interesting as lectures but they are not the ideal way to read about a topic. However, the way Feynman explains certain concrete idea is really interesting; in particular the chapter on quantum mechanics is good and easy to follow. I'm on the fence as to whether to read the full set of lectures.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Când tocmai te gandesti ce grea și de neinteles e mecanica cuantica afli deodata ca e doar un domeniu vast care cuprinde altele mult mai complicate ca nucleodinamica cuantica. O capodopera a celui mai bun profesor din toate timpurile. Integrativ, m-a ajutat sa îmi solidific puțin cunoștintele in fizica și sa fac legaturi între domenii pe care le credeam disjuncte. Chiar dacă sunt prezentate cursurile profesorului Feynman pentru studentii din primii ani de la caltech tot ai nevoie de o oarecare baza pentru a trece prin aceasta carticica.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Couldn't really appreciate it as haven't touched formal physics education since age 16 (and even then we seemed to only learn about circuits for some reason). So the innovative ways (from reading about reading this book) that Feynman explains concepts wasn't as pleasant to me as it would be to people who have recent or substantial academic physics backgrounds. Which was a shame.

Another consequent of this was my preference for the early chapters in which Feynman explains veeery core ideas such as stuff is made from smaller stuff. This was great. But I would have benefitted from the intervening lectures which were not present here.
April 17,2025
... Show More
I love this book. I wonder why I didn't study physics when I was younger. It is so fascinating. Physics is probably the most significant science of all time. It has had its impact already on many fronts. There'd be no transistors or cell phones without physics. If we don't apply Einstein's equations into the satellites we build, our GPS will render useless. Physics also has an intimate relationship with other scientific fields like astronomy, chemistry, biology, etc. I think this book is relatively easy to understand even if you have no background in physics. There are times though you may feel a bit out of your depth, especially as we get into the mystifying realm of quantum mechanics. Be that as it may, it is still a good source of knowledge for the physics majors as well as laypeople. You have to read the book with the caveat that it was written back in the 1960's and so a lot were not known back then. For instance, the strong nuclear force was not discovered yet. hope you enjoy.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.